Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[purple_rider]

5 hours ago, Kizune said:

Machine learning/Deep learning workstation. I just wanted my main workstation not to be boring plus i wanted to try myself at the custom water cooling - so it is my first try at that too.

 

My previous workstation (now retired to be my main home PC) looks like this:

-snip-

Does your work buy you the parts for them and let you keep them after they're retired or something?

[Kizune]

9 hours ago, Whitshad said:

By the way I'd be curious to know your single-core score

Ok, your curiosity is contagious - i have to drive this evening to the office to test it, but here it is: the single-core score is 157 (little bit lower than i7 4770k - it has 165.

[Kizune]

46 minutes ago, purple_rider said:

Does your work buy you the parts for them and let you keep them after they're retired or something?

Not exactly. Some parts i recover from the e-waste before they being sent to be destroyed, some parts i'm buying on e-bay or craigslist. Living in silicon valley is expensive, but if your hobby is building powerful computers - then this place rocks.

[Whitshad]

2 hours ago, Kizune said:

Ok, your curiosity is contagious - i have to drive this evening to the office to test it, but here it is: the single-core score is 157 (little bit lower than i7 4770k - it has 165.

157 single-core score is pretty good, fairly same as that of an i7 6850K (156), you've a great chip dude

[KazeNilrem]

First time running cinebench and just recently built my pc (very recent actually hehe). So, here we go. I have not attempt any OC or anything of the sort yet. But for now, this is what I am working with. 

 

 

[mikkelreven]

Just cracked 1800 with ryzen 1700x  It's air-cooled with noctua 15, not sure the excact name for this cooler.

[Jumper118]

 

 

 

 

 

Thread is busy atm  

[agent_x007]

Haswell-E no longer in LGA 2011 (-1) !
We should celebrate !
Thank you.

[Kizune]

Spent a good chunk of the Sunday at the office playing with the power delivery options and overclocking CPU and memory. Result - Finally! Over 8000! (Not 9000 yet, but i'm going there). Not the 24/7 o/c, but gets me to the 10th place in hwbot overall rating - which is fine with me

[joishw]

On 9/13/2018 at 5:58 PM, joishw said:

Before and after an OC that wasn't intentional but decided to run with it. Noticed that I hadn't used the XMP profile for the RAM and when I enabled it the CPU went up to 3.6Ghz. May as well go to 4Ghz  

 

Edit: 

 

Decided to see what my dual Xeon E5649 playground got, safe to say I'm underwhelmed. May have to OC this too! 

And the new build

 

[Jumper118]

46 minutes ago, joishw said:

And the new build

That is much better. Threadripper is the master race. 

[SlowMixit]

So close, but so far.. i want that 1800 points.

This is 24/7 Stable aka 8hours Prime95 1344, 24hours blend and Linx 0.8 12hours.

I can probably get another 50Mhz out of it under 1.5v 24/7 stable but needs tweaking, 5.45Ghz is no go even at 1.5-1.52v.

I need better mainboard to go further, i belive chip it self is capable over 5.4Ghz under 1.5v.

 

 

Specs :

- i7 8086K @ 5.35Ghz 1.44v

- Asus Strix Z370-F 

- 2x8Gb Corsair Vengeance 3733 CL16 (Samsung B-die)

- Intel Integrated because... brand new RTX2080 Ti broke after few hours

- EVGA SuperNova G2 1000W

- Custom loop watercooling (3x180mm Rad, D5 pump, EK-Supremacy Block)

[Jumper118]

2 hours ago, SlowMixit said:

So close, but so far.. i want that 1800 points.

This is 24/7 Stable aka 8hours Prime95 1344, 24hours blend and Linx 0.8 12hours.

I can probably get another 50Mhz out of it under 1.5v 24/7 stable but needs tweaking, 5.45Ghz is no go even at 1.5-1.52v.

I need better mainboard to go further, i belive chip it self is capable over 5.4Ghz under 1.5v.

 

Specs :

- i7 8086K @ 5.35Ghz 1.44v

- Asus Strix Z370-F 

- 2x8Gb Corsair Vengeance 3733 CL16 (Samsung B-die)

- Intel Integrated because... brand new RTX2080 Ti broke after few hours

- EVGA SuperNova G2 1000W

- Custom loop watercooling (3x180mm Rad, D5 pump, EK-Supremacy Block)

Just get it cinebench stable and it will ez do 1800

[aaws]

5.1 stable on all 6 i know i gotta turn down the volts a bit 1.3-1.37 is good

 

[GMart84]

@SlowMixit

 

Now I hate my 8086K after seeing what yours can do.  I cannot get it over 5.3 even with 1.5 vcore.  I am guessing there is some other stability issues too in there.  But I wish I could break the 1700 marker with mine.  CPU is cooled with a CoolStream PE 480mm radiator and full load temps at the 1.5 vcore never got above 75 degrees.

[SlowMixit]

For me stabilizing factor was VCCSA and VCCIO of 1.3v above 5.3Ghz.

I run Cache at 46x, maybe i could go one step further to 47x,

 

I tried going Cinebench R15 stable with 5.4Ghz and machine rebooted within 5 seconds of starting the benchmark so i think VRM on this board cannot do any better.

 

Im thinking of buying Gigabyte Aorus Z390 Elite or Pro, according to buildzoid those boards have good enough VRM even for 9900K if i deside to upgrade later on.

[Jumper118]

36 minutes ago, SlowMixit said:

For me stabilizing factor was VCCSA and VCCIO of 1.3v above 5.3Ghz.

I run Cache at 46x, maybe i could go one step further to 47x,

 

I tried going Cinebench R15 stable with 5.4Ghz and machine rebooted within 5 seconds of starting the benchmark so i think VRM on this board cannot do any better.

 

Im thinking of buying Gigabyte Aorus Z390 Elite or Pro, according to buildzoid those boards have good enough VRM even for 9900K if i deside to upgrade later on.

they might have a good vr, but they will suck hard for benchmarks and max oc  

[GMart84]

@SlowMixit

 

I will give that a try.  I have a VCCSA set at 1.2 and VCCIO set at 1.15.  I am actually running the Cache at 53x curently.

[Mephi00]

2 hours ago, GMart84 said:

@SlowMixit

 

I will give that a try.  I have a VCCSA set at 1.2 and VCCIO set at 1.15.  I am actually running the Cache at 53x curently.

If you dial your cache back you might gett better overclocks, i have to do that with my 9900k

[GMart84]

Well I managed to break the 1700 barrier, I am wondering if Cinebench like tighter timings or the faster memory overclock.  I tried everything and it kept failing, the best results I can get are at the following settings.

 

5.3 GHz @ 1.46 vCore

Cache 6.0 Ghz @ 1.20 VCCSA and 1.15 VCCIO

Memory 3800MHz @ 1.37v

 

Thanks for the help guys, i appreciate the tips.

[Dabombinable]

8 minutes ago, GMart84 said:

Well I managed to break the 1700 barrier, I am wondering if Cinebench like tighter timings or the faster memory overclock.  I tried everything and it kept failing, the best results I can get are at the following settings.

 

5.3 GHz @ 1.46 vCore

Cache 6.0 Ghz @ 1.20 VCCSA and 1.15 VCCIO

Memory 3800MHz @ 1.37v

 

Thanks for the help guys, i appreciate the tips.

TBH I'm not sure what to think about CB and how it behaves with different RAM coinfigs. For example my 4790K scores higher with single channel DDR3 1866 than it does with dual channel DDR3 1600. Though that is single channel on my Z97 Sabertooth MKII, dual channel on a Gigabyte H97 HD3.

[GMart84]

I ended up trying it with the RAM set at 3200 with CL14 Timings and the score was exactly the same at 1704.  I think I am at the limit of my chip.  Not bad but not the greatest.  I will take it as I have heard that you don't get the best chips where I bought it.  5.2 @ 1.36 is good enough for a 1663 cb and much safer for an everyday OC, IMHO.

[SlowMixit]

@GMart84 You have very loose timings for 3800, are those Samsung B-Die? If they are you would be better going 3733 CL16, there is post in Asus ROG forums about this for Z370/Z390 mainboards.

 

11 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

they might have a good vr, but they will suck hard for benchmarks and max oc  

We will see, i have no problem buying another board if they suck in benchmarks and max oc.

I need do research, check overclocking reviews etc.. to see what i should buy.

 

 

Edit : Update, managed to get it Cinebench stable for one run at 5.45Ghz, had to try like 5 times and 4 times of those the machine just shut down because VRM could not keap up.

I'm shure now CPU is capable 5.5Ghz with better mainboard for Cinebench stability.

If i just had GMart84's mainboard

 

[GMart84]

@SlowMixit

 

That is awesome.  Now I am really jealous!  I had to jump to the Maximus from a Strix to get more stability both Z370 boards.  I have tried everything and the RAM will not OC with tighter timings even at 3733, I am pretty sure it is not Samsung B-Die though I would need to take it out to double check.  As for the CPU 5.3 is my peak, I even tried it with a manual overclock of 1.52 and it was unstable.  It would boot at 5.4 @ 1.48-1.52 but it fails almost immediately into any workload, even with the cache turned down to 40.  Oh well, I love MicroCenter but I have heard they do not get good chips from the factories.

[nick name]

29 minutes ago, GMart84 said:

@SlowMixit

 

That is awesome.  Now I am really jealous!  I had to jump to the Maximus from a Strix to get more stability both Z370 boards.  I have tried everything and the RAM will not OC with tighter timings even at 3733, I am pretty sure it is not Samsung B-Die though I would need to take it out to double check.  As for the CPU 5.3 is my peak, I even tried it with a manual overclock of 1.52 and it was unstable.  It would boot at 5.4 @ 1.48-1.52 but it fails almost immediately into any workload, even with the cache turned down to 40.  Oh well, I love MicroCenter but I have heard they do not get good chips from the factories.

You can check your RAM using Thaiphoon Burner.