Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[agent_x007]

Quote

slower than my cvfz so i sold it.

I guess "cvfz" stands for Crosshair V Formula Z ?

[Jumper118]

11 minutes ago, agent_x007 said:

I guess "cvfz" stands for Crosshair V Formula Z ?

yeah thats right. i dont have that any more either. i only have a m5a99x evo atm. 

[WaterlooDude]

6850k @ 4.4GHZ

GTX 1080 @1700MHZ

[Dabombinable]

9 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

yeah 1.4v should be fine one dual core even if you are blowing on it with no heatsink  

Well, here goes nothing.

 

Edit: Annnd the PSU's overload and overtemp protection kicked in.

[Dabombinable]

Finally got my 4790K running better, turns out that adjusting the VRM to run at full phased, and the FIVR to run at performance made a massive difference-though I couldn't replicate the top score with multiple re-runs (4.8GHz 1 core, 4.7GHz 2-3 core, 4.6GHz 4 core).

[Jumper118]

3 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

Finally got my 4790K running better, turns out that adjusting the VRM to run at full phased, and the FIVR to run at performance made a massive difference-though I couldn't replicate the top score with multiple re-runs (4.8GHz 1 core, 4.7GHz 2-3 core, 4.6GHz 4 core).

 

ram still at 1333mhz?

[Dabombinable]

Just now, Jumper118 said:

ram still at 1333mhz?

1600MHz is a no-go on my 1333MHz stick, no matter what timings+voltage are used, it refuses to post/run stable.

[Jumper118]

4 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

1600MHz is a no-go on my 1333MHz stick, no matter what timings+voltage are used, it refuses to post/run stable.

ok. what about the cache? you tried over 4ghz? 1:1 ratio is ideal.

[Dabombinable]

Just now, Jumper118 said:

ok. what about the cache? you tried over 4ghz? 1:1 ratio is ideal.

4.6GHz is the maximum speed for the cache-I had it at stock for this run, and the cache's change in clock speed only shows if I adjust the BCLK (which makes my 4790K benchmark lower).

[Dabombinable]

On 17/12/2016 at 7:16 AM, Jumper118 said:

i dont think anyone has run an am3+cpu in an am2+ board yet but the only cpu that will benefit are single core and dual core locked chips that need a higher base clock. 

try this. 

turn off all power saving poo

set cpu core to 1.4v

set ram to 2-2.2v

set fsb to 1.38v

set nb to 1.38v

enable LLC 

then see how high it will go. then i shall tell you how good it is. 

I've replaced the PSU+set everything back to auto since I was getting lower scores than at 4.2GHz, for whatever reason the Deluxe runs best with everything left at auto, unlike my Sabertooth MKII.

[iHardware Shelden]

[maybethisnamewillwork]

[Jumper118]

6 minutes ago, maybethisnamewillwork said:

 

is that a 5ghz 4790K? i cant quite see because of your 4k master raceness

[maybethisnamewillwork]

2 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

is that a 5ghz 4790K? i cant quite see because of your 4k master raceness

Zoom the pic 
And yes it's running 5005.99MHz @ 1.355V

[Jumper118]

2 minutes ago, maybethisnamewillwork said:

Zoom the pic 
And yes it's running 5005.99MHz @ 1.355V

nice  you should run your memory at 1T , its a lot faster. 

[maybethisnamewillwork]

12 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

nice  you should run your memory at 1T , its a lot faster. 

Unfortunately it won't accept anything I try with it, any lower timings or even 2600MHz/cl11 not stable at 1.75V 

[Jumper118]

2 minutes ago, maybethisnamewillwork said:

Unfortunately it won't accept anything I try with it, any lower timings or even 2600MHz/cl11 not stable at 1.75V 

that is xmp speed though so it should work  what have you got the cpu sa voltage at? try a bit more voltage on that. 

[knightslugger]

[maybethisnamewillwork]

1 hour ago, Jumper118 said:

that is xmp speed though so it should work  what have you got the cpu sa voltage at? try a bit more voltage on that. 

The profile I currently use had some tighter sub timings so it won't accept 1T.
But I think they perform equally as the other one has tighter sub timings.
I tried both profiles in 32M SuperPi and the one with 1T was whopping 0.3 seconds faster... 

System agent has +300mV offset.

[Jumper118]

3 minutes ago, maybethisnamewillwork said:

The profile I currently use had some tighter sub timings so it won't accept 1T.
But I think they perform equally as the other one has tighter sub timings.
I tried both profiles in 32M SuperPi and the one with 1T was whopping 0.3 seconds faster... 

System agent has +300mV offset.

thats a huge amounts faster. the 1t will feel way faster in the os and normal use as well. 

On 12/17/2016 at 6:58 AM, WaterlooDude said:

6850k @ 4.4GHZ

GTX 1080 @1700MHZ

 

you need cpuz please

[agent_x007]

I tweaked RAM and IMC settings + added 1MHz in HT bus speed (I'm over 4,2GHz mark), it helped a bit
+I would like to request a "DDR2" text to be added in column for comments.

2003 :


R11.5 :


R15 :

[iHardware Shelden]

http://valid.x86.fr/kzdlrh

 

[Dabombinable]

Ok. WTF. HW monitor open, no background programs closed, FF open. And it scored higher (4.8GHz single core, 4.7GHz multi core):

And the stability issues in the past definitely have stemmed from not enough current being delivered to the 4790K due to the motherboard's VRM not running at full phase, and the 4790K's FIVR at extreme. The power consumption has increased a lot since I made those changes, and the required voltage has gone down.

 

[maybethisnamewillwork]

18 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

thats a huge amounts faster. the 1t will feel way faster in the os and normal use as well. 

Yeah it actually seems to perform a bit better in aida64 cache & memory benchmark.
Also managed to slightly tighten some timings so now I'm running stable 10-12-11-28 1T. 

[Dabombinable]

Another tweak, using the FSB+setting the CPU input voltage to 1.9V, 4.795MHz, and the DDR3 is more crippling than I first thought, it only has 1 rank/1 side, making it a bit slower than the DDR3 1333 in my old laptop:

Spoiler