Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[Jumper118]

My 3930k at 4.8Ghz:

............ i think the picture is missing 

[skline00]

Sorry Jumper118, it's corrected.

[Jumper118]

Sorry Jumper118, it's corrected.

tis ok i'll put you on the score boards now

[Mooshi]

I think when my rig is knocking on 4 years old, I'll retire the 2500K.

[B NEGATIVE]

I can play?

 

[hehehehhehehehe]

I can play?

 

Nice work man!

And now we divide that by two for comparison sake

[B NEGATIVE]

Nice work man!

And now we divide that by two for comparison sake

 

Not quite as i can switch off NUMA for more ram speed and up the speed to about 4.2-4.3,this is a 24/7 OC.

 

Can score around 22 in the R13 version

[Linus_torvalds]

Here's my score, running a fx 8320 and a Radeon hd 7950

 

you are running 8 core processor at 4.7 ghz and hd 7950 GPU and here is my results

i have seen in this forum many people who asks for advice about CPU to buy and almost everyone seggests 8320 or 8350 (they are the same just overclocked) and here you can see that 3770 at 4.3 ghz (quad core processor) beats 8320 at 4.7 ghz (an eight core processor) and your opengl average fps is as low as my gtz 660s because your processor is limiting that card very hard.  go here and https://linustechtips.com/main/forum/5-cpus-motherboards-and-memory/

and you can easily find that many sugestions are made to buy AMDs 8 core procesor and argument is that it is just better nothing else.

this bench utilizes every core cpu has and how do you think in games wich use 2 or 4 cores wich one will be better? intels quad core i series or AMDs 8 core? 

[B NEGATIVE]

No one cares what proc you have.....and you have 8 threads the same as he does,not 4.

 

This is a Cinebench thread,not an Intel is best derp thread

[Flojer0]

its a sandy not an ivy that i've got its a 2550k

Oh, I saw 3570k mentioned and assumed that was what you got. (Edit: and I would be suprised if you couldn't do 5GHz, I only don't try because I'm afraid of frying my motherboard, but if I had a good board it looks like I'd have little trouble getting there myself. Just promise not to kill this one too )

 

 

I think when my rig is knocking on 4 years old, I'll retire the 2500K.

I hope to do the same. Though unfortunately it depends a bit on where my fun money needs to go.

 

 

you are running 8 core processor at 4.7 ghz and hd 7950 GPU and here is my results

 

i have seen in this forum many people who asks for advice about CPU to buy and almost everyone seggests 8320 or 8350 (they are the same just overclocked) and here you can see that 3770 at 4.3 ghz (quad core processor) beats 8320 at 4.7 ghz (an eight core processor) and your opengl average fps is as low as my gtz 660s because your processor is limiting that card very hard.  go here and https://linustechtips.com/main/forum/5-cpus-motherboards-and-memory/

and you can easily find that many sugestions are made to buy AMDs 8 core procesor and argument is that it is just better nothing else.

this bench utilizes every core cpu has and how do you think in games wich use 2 or 4 cores wich one will be better? intels quad core i series or AMDs 8 core? 

Um, for one you are comparing a roughly $300 cpu to a $160 cpu. Second many have proven that there is little appreciable difference in real games between a 8350 and an i5, never mind how this thread has proven that hyperthreading can harm gaming performance. Third, this is just one benchmark that honestly aside from e-peen doesn't mean snot to any of us unless we actually do 3D rendering regularly. Fourth, it is just not okay to tell someone they wasted their money.

 

If you want to do a proper analysis between both camps you should compare similarly priced products. The i5-3350p is $180, $20 more than the 8320, and the world record score on that chip is only 527cb: http://hwbot.org/submission/2433329_true_monkey_cinebench_r15_core_i5_3350p_527_cb .

 

If you can only afford a processor in that range I say that one of AMD's chips would be a very compelling buy.

[Godlygamer23]

How do you guys have single core? Mine's not showing up.

[B NEGATIVE]

How do you guys have single core? Mine's not showing up.

File. Advanced Benchmark.

[Godlygamer23]

Strange. I figured that was it and clicked it and it didn't come up. Anyways, thanks. (It's working now)

[ProKoN]

i would like to update my haswell scores later. trying to hit 2.0 or better single core right now

[Jumper118]

I can play?

 

nice score! 

 

Oh, I saw 3570k mentioned and assumed that was what you got. (Edit: and I would be suprised if you couldn't do 5GHz, I only don't try because I'm afraid of frying my motherboard, but if I had a good board it looks like I'd have little trouble getting there myself. Just promise not to kill this one too )

 

 

I hope to do the same. Though unfortunately it depends a bit on where my fun money needs to go.

i need at least 4.9ghz to beat my mates 3570k@4.7ghz so i'm hoping for that at the least, this time tomorrow we shall know! 

 

i would like to update my haswell scores later. trying to hit 2.0 or better single core right now

2.0 isn't very high   do you mean 200? the highest single core score i've seen is 197 by a 4770k@4.9ghz 

[Godlygamer23]

Multi-threaded results: 580

Single threaded results: 149

 

3570K @ 4.2GHz(not 4.4GHz as currently stated on my profile)

[ProKoN]

nice score! 

 

i need at least 4.9ghz to beat my mates 3570k@4.7ghz so i'm hoping for that at the least, this time tomorrow we shall know! 

 

2.0 isn't very high   do you mean 200? the highest single core score i've seen is 197 by a 4770k@4.9ghz 

 sorry my bad. yes trying to hit 200. my highest single core score is 199. right now im trying to beat the amd 8 cores multithread scores. with 4 intel cores

[iSuzak]

you are running 8 core processor at 4.7 ghz and hd 7950 GPU and here is my results

i have seen in this forum many people who asks for advice about CPU to buy and almost everyone seggests 8320 or 8350 (they are the same just overclocked) and here you can see that 3770 at 4.3 ghz (quad core processor) beats 8320 at 4.7 ghz (an eight core processor) and your opengl average fps is as low as my gtz 660s because your processor is limiting that card very hard.  go here and https://linustechtips.com/main/forum/5-cpus-motherboards-and-memory/

and you can easily find that many sugestions are made to buy AMDs 8 core procesor and argument is that it is just better nothing else.

this bench utilizes every core cpu has and how do you think in games wich use 2 or 4 cores wich one will be better? intels quad core i series or AMDs 8 core? 

 

I'm quite happy with my actual rig, i can play every games i throw at it. It's good if your cpu performs better than mine i'm happy if my post have reassured you that intel can do better than a Fx 8320 with a 300$ CPU.

Even if you make it sounds like i completely wasted my money(or should have gone for intel) i still believe this cpu have an awesome Price/Performance ratio,in my case i just added a few bucks after selling my old phenom 965 to be able to afford it. In the end buying this cpu was a very smart move and i don't regret it one bit, whether you like it or not.

[Torand]

3570k @ stock:

 

 

 

7970 Matrix Platinum @ stock (factory OC):

 

 

I have a feeling something is not quite right...

[ProKoN]

3570k @ stock:

 

 

 

7970 Matrix Platinum @ stock (factory OC):

 

 

I have a feeling something is not quite right...

 

 

when testing your cpu

 

make sure you have closed all background programs

 

in the processes tab in task manager the only need processes are (for win7)

 

 

 

csrss.exe

dwm.exe

explorer.exe

winlogon.exe

 

 

 

you may want to run your video driver when benching your gpu.

 

what is your mem chips running at ?1600MHz?

[Linus_torvalds]

I'm quite happy with my actual rig, i can play every games i throw at it. It's good if your cpu performs better than mine i'm happy if my post have reassured you that intel can do better than a Fx 8320 with a 300$ CPU.

Even if you make it sounds like i completely wasted my money(or should have gone for intel) i still believe this cpu have an awesome Price/Performance ratio,in my case i just added a few bucks after selling my old phenom 965 to be able to afford it. In the end buying this cpu was a very smart move and i don't regret it one bit, whether you like it or not.

no i am not telling that your choice was bad or you must have gone for intels cpu. i wrote that in this forum 4-5 man posted me that FX 8350 outperforms any 4 core i7 and my post was answer to it. i7 do better even at lower frequencies then that 8 core processor.

for me my CPU is better price/performance because i got it for only 200 $  

[ProKoN]

Scores achieved using " Per Core " overclocking  with an Asus Z87 Plus mainboard

 

4670K

 

49x

49x

48x

48x

 

4800MHz ring bus

 

 

 

 

50x

50x

49x

49x

 

4900Mhz ring bus

 

 

 

4770K

 

102.01 Bclk

 

49x

48x

47x

46x

 

ring bus 4692MHz

 

 

[CthulDude]

Scores achieved using " Per Core " overclocking  with an Asus Z87 Plus mainboard

 

4670K

 

49x

49x

48x

48x

 

4800MHz ring bus

 

 

 

 

50x

50x

49x

49x

 

4900Mhz ring bus

 

 

So awesome! Congratz, man. I would say you achieved your goals.

[ProKoN]

So awesome! Congratz, man. I would say you achieved your goals.

Thanks man .

 

The credit should go to asus. I cant believe it did better than the z87 mpower max

 

next, I have a certain i7 in sight.

[MegaTechPC]

My old 3960X did better at 5GHz than my new 4930K can seem to manage at 4.7GHz but here it is anyway:

 

 

Intel Core i7 4930K @ 4.7GHz

4 x 4GB Patriot Viper Xtreme @ 2133MHz (10-12-10-31-2T)