Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[nick name]

54 minutes ago, Plutosaurus said:

its not a big deal just curious. thanks man this is just fun messing with new benchmarks

Ok -- single core at 4.47GHz.  I'd try harder, but I hate waiting on single core Cinebench and this new one takes even longer.  

 

Edit:

 

I can't wait for next gen Ryzen.  

 

Edit 2:

 

Lol.  I forgot to click the Memory tab on the second CPU-Z windows.  

 

[Kizune]

4 minutes ago, nick name said:

What did that take?  Like 5 seconds to render?  

About 22 seconds from the click of a "Run" to a final result. Which is now 17150.

[leadeater]

1 hour ago, Kizune said:

Here's my score - not a real O/C, it's just the way my machine runs 24/7 so it has to be stable.
Dual Platinum 8168 with all cores turbo boost and bclk at 102.9. 192GB of DDR4@2666. At least i've beaten their stupid baseline.

Nice, got a quad 8890v4 server at work doing nothing, need to think of a way to slip Windows on to it without killing the current OS. Might have to pop some more disks in to it. Without getting told off for wasting work time.... lol.

[Kizune]

17 minutes ago, leadeater said:

Nice, got a quad 8890v4 server at work doing nothing, need to think of a way to slip Windows on to it without killing the current OS. Might have to pop some more disks in to it. Without getting told off for wasting work time.... lol.

Ever thought of just booting it up from the external USB HDD or SSD? I mean - not like you will use it for more than just a couple of hours this way, so why even bother disassembling it?

[leadeater]

2 minutes ago, Kizune said:

Ever thought of just booting it up from the external USB HDD or SSD? I mean - not like you will use it for more than just a couple of hours this way, so why even bother disassembling it?

It's an HPE DL580 Gen9, hotswap bays are great 

[DesolationGod]

Here is my R20 Score:

[nick name]

2 hours ago, Kizune said:

About 22 seconds from the click of a "Run" to a final result. Which is now 17150.

I wonder what a real CPU could do lol.

[nick name]

I can say that Cinebench R20 is harder to run than Cinebench R15.  It creates higher temps, but moreso the crashes at simple overclocks is much more prevalent.  

 

And has anyone else noticed that it runs in Below Normal priority?  

 

Edit:

 

What I designated crashes was probably just normal behavior while running in High Priority mode.  I'm dumb.

[Coachdude]

i7 6700K @ 4.7GHz @1.36v. I ran the single core test but didn't screen, scored ~500.

[nick name]

11 minutes ago, Coachdude said:

i7 6700K @ 4.7GHz @1.36v. I ran the single core test but didn't screen, scored ~500.

Ouch.  Intel makes single core Ryzen performance seem abismal with this new Cinebench.  With R15 it looked a lot more reasonable.

[Pasi123]

Cinebench R20 on my school's laptop. And (of course) the CPU is at stock.

 

[nick name]

Ryzen 2700X @ 3.57GHz 4.357GHz

Score: 4547

 

I ran this several times and achieved the exact same score every time.  This version is much more consistent in its scoring than before.  

[randomhkkid]

2811 / 422

Razer Blade 15 Advanced 2018

i7 8750H

 

Interestingly the score relative to the 8700k stock has dropped compared to CB r15

[Ground]

11 hours ago, KingCry said:

 this bench is gonna be a headache for the bot. Mainly cause HPET would need to be enabled and proven enabled.

 

Its also just as easy to exploit for fake scores. It would need a wrapper to be safe...

[Raudi_]

16 minutes ago, Ground said:

Its also just as easy to exploit for fake scores. It would need a wrapper to be safe...

Very true, though it might be awhile before we would see one. That's if there is enough intreste in it.

[Mister Woof]

I should do this at 5.2

 

The score I posted is my 24/7

[Tech Wizard]

Casual 24/7 daily settings on X79. Might go hard when there's a chart up 

 

[Pasi123]

Xeon X5670 @ 4.32GHz with some garbage on background. Maybe I'll overclock it higher and try again.

 

[paddy-stone]

Ryzen 1700 @3.9Ghz - 1.325v

 

3826 score - forgot to run CPU-z

 

[TahoeDust]

24/7 Daily Driver mode...

 

[nick name]

3 hours ago, TahoeDust said:

24/7 Daily Driver mode...

 

Damn, now I feel dumb struggling to try and hit 4600 last night.  

[AlTech]

Here's my R20 1700X Stock 3.4GHz bench.

 

[Jumper118]

25 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Here's my R20 1700X Stock 3.4GHz bench.

 

no cpuz doe. 

[PianoPlayer88Key]

32 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

no cpuz doe. 

I'm getting ready to post mine for R20, but how would I get CPU-Z on it accurately?  I already have a couple runs done (one on an i7-6700K, other on a Core 2 Duo T7250), but I had everything else shut down so the CPU would have its max resources available for Cinebench.  The CPUs are set to clock down when not under load, so if I open CPU-Z AFTER I run CB20, it would show a low clock speed.  But, if I have CPU-Z open while running CB, my score wouldn't be as high.  Running Prime95 to get the clock speed up for the CPU-Z screenshot might not work as it might throttle.  Any ideas on what I can do to get accurate cinebench scores AND CPU-Z clocks?  (I'm not going to turn off power saving features, speedstep, etc.)  I also have a 4790K, but due to various things I don't plan on powering on that system for a while.

[DildorTheDecent]

18 minutes ago, PianoPlayer88Key said:

 

This isn't a serious thread so don't concern yourself with accuracy. Just have it open.

 

Even if the clocks aren't displayed, math can be done to figure it out. It's rough, but it works.

 

CPU might even boost slightly whenever the program is open. Or it will show the max multiplier in CPU-Z anyway.

---

Whatever happens, it isn't a concern. You're already doing better than those plebs you forgo CPU-Z entirely. Despite it being in a massive font in the OP and there being over 600 pages of submissions.