DPI concerns on a 27 inch

[LazyLizard]

My favorite screen size right now for gaming is 27 inches, I am currently running a pc for 1080p gaming I figured that the pixel density at 4K on a 27 inch screen would remove the need for anti-aliasing, however it seems that jagged edges are still present on games. So since I wont upgrade my setup until I find a resolution high enough that its DPI removes the need for AA on a 27 inch I was wondering if anyone has any opinions or seen anything about 8K gaming.

[DXMember]

are you playing games from 2010 that you see jaggies at 4K??

 

With Windows you always want to aim for about 96DPI, that'll be 1440p @ 27" and 4K @ 32"

there should be no aliasing problems, if there are any, you can turn on FXAA to make everything very blurry

[Knaj]

8k gaming. You'd have to have a modder make custom textures that support 8k for like every game ever.

If you're good playing at low frame rates with medium settings on a 8 thousand dollar pc.

And if you're ok buying a screen that is almost the cost of 4 sedans then yeh, great idea.

Total cost to game at 8k:

80,000 USD for the display, 8,000 for the pc, and a lot of money to hire professional developers to make textures for you

Grand total: ~95,000 usd.

 

Shitpost aside, sorry.

It's practically impossible. 

 

 

[LazyLizard]

I am not looking to upgrade now, the GTX 1080 can barley do 60 fp on average I now 8K wont happen for a while. I am just asking the forum what it has heard about 8K tech examples how high a screen can you go to remove the need for AA and so on. 

[LazyLizard]

6 minutes ago, Knaj said:

8k gaming. You'd have to have a modder make custom textures that support 8k for like every game ever.

If you're good playing at low frame rates with medium settings on a 8 thousand dollar pc.

And if you're ok buying a screen that is almost the cost of 4 sedans then yeh, great idea.

Total cost to game at 8k:

80,000 USD for the display, 8,000 for the pc, and a lot of money to hire professional developers to make textures for you

Grand total: ~95,000 usd.

 

Shitpost aside, sorry.

It's practically impossible. 

 

 

No need to insult the post, just cause you don't understand the question.

[DXMember]

12 minutes ago, LazyLizard said:

I am not looking to upgrade now, the GTX 1080 can barley do 60 fp on average I now 8K wont happen for a while. I am just asking the forum what it has heard about 8K tech examples how high a screen can you go to remove the need for AA and so on. 

AMD says 8K per eye in VR - that's like a screen 1 inch away from your face - is what you need for full immersion and photorealism

[LazyLizard]

Oh ok, other forums are also saying it depends on a individuals eye sight, so you could get away with lower resolutions. thanks for the reply.