GTX 1080M Specs revealed! What a shame.....

[AlTech]

The GTX 1080M specs have been revealed and they are as follows

 

Quote

Alleged specifications and benchmarks of NVIDIA’s upcoming GeForce GTX 1080M mobility graphics chip have been leaked by

Videocardz. The GeForce GTX 1080M has been part of our headlines for the past few weeks and from the looks of it, it will become the flagship Pascal offering for the mobility market and will utilize the GP104 architecture to deliver unprecedented performance increase in high-end, enthusiast grade laptops.

Read more: http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gtx-1080m-specifications-performance-leak/#ixzz4CDatA2vt

 

 

Which is such a shame that Nvidia didn't release the one version of the 1080 for both Mobile and Desktop.

 

On average I would expect it to be about 20-30% slower than the GTX 1080.

 

What a shame Nvidia !

[Lays]

Does anything please anyone anymore? Good grief

[Nacho Marco Segui]

They will release it later down the road, so you have to buy a new laptop

#Business

[AlTech]

1 minute ago, Lays said:

Does anything please anyone anymore? Good grief

Things do please people but many people thought that with the 1080 it would run both in Mobile and Desktop with little to no compromises.

[don_svetlio]

SRSLY? The fuck is this shit? OCed 980M, that's the best they could do? REALLY? FUCK SAKE. Goddamn fail...

[AlTech]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

SRSLY? The fuck is this shit? OCed 980M, that's the best they could do? REALLY? FUCK SAKE. Goddamn fail...

IT appears to be Pascal Architecture with the exact same core configuration as before and slightly faster Memory clock and core clock. Oh and the 980M isn't the predecessor. The predecessor was the "980 for Notebooks".

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, AluminiumTech said:

IT appears to be Pascal Architecture with the exact same core configuration as before and slightly faster Memory clock and core clock. Oh and the 980M isn't the predecessor. The predecessor was the "980 for Notebooks".

And the 980 for notebooks would probably be around the same as this POS. goddamn it. the low clocks make Pascal useless.

[Misanthrope]

Ummm it CLEARLY says gp104 this is a pascal chip... Chill. 

[Lays]

2 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

SRSLY? The fuck is this shit? OCed 980M, that's the best they could do? REALLY? FUCK SAKE. Goddamn fail...

What do you mean OC'd 980M?

 

3 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Things do please people but many people thought that with the 1080 it would run both in Mobile and Desktop with little to no compromises.

You do realize that 1080m getting 17k GPU score in Firestrike is INSANE performance for a laptop right?

 

My 980 Classified at over 1600 mhz core and over 9000 mhz memory was getting around 17.7k. That's a VERY large jump over anything any other laptops are going to be getting, even the ones with desktop 980s in them.

[AlTech]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

And the 980 for notebooks would probably be around the same as this POS. goddamn it. the low clocks make Pascal useless.

It should be still faster then the 980 for notebooks but still this is shitty

 

1 minute ago, Misanthrope said:

Ummm it CLEARLY says gp104 this is a pascal chip... Chill. 

He was referring to the core configuration and jumped to the conclusion that having the same core config would mean the same performance.

[blu4]

I though it would have a TDP of around 110-120W max... Not this. A failure tbh.

[AlTech]

2 minutes ago, blu4 said:

I though it would have a TDP of around 110-120W max... Not this. A failure tbh.

Again, some context here.

 

The predecessor to this was the "GTX 980 for Notebooks". It had a TDP near 150w as well.

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, Lays said:

What do you mean OC'd 980M?

 

You do realize that 1080m getting 17k GPU score in Firestrike is INSANE performance for a laptop right?

 

My 980 Classified at over 1600 mhz core and over 9000 mhz memory was getting around 17.7k. That's a VERY large jump over anything any other laptops are going to be getting, even the ones with desktop 980s in them.

No, it is not. We've had 980s in laptops for several months. This is, at best, a 10% increase. Is that the best they can do? If so, what a letdown.

 

1 minute ago, AluminiumTech said:

It should be still faster then the 980 for notebooks but still this is shitty

 

He was referring to the core configuration and jumped to the conclusion that having the same core config would mean the same performance.

Doubt it. I really doubt it. At such low clocks (for Pascal) performance will be the same as a 980 was in laptops. Fucking disgrace

 

2 minutes ago, blu4 said:

I though it would have a TDP of around 110-120W max... Not this. A failure tbh.

That too - hot and loud laptops. Fun times...

[Kobz360]

Should perform like a 1070ish.. not bad at all tbh, especially for a laptop. I'm very interested as to how much gaming laptops with this GPU will cost. 

 

Battery life with this GPU will probably still be garbage but that's to be expected. 

[AlTech]

2 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

No, it is not. We've had 980s in laptops for several months. This is, at best, a 10% increase. Is that the best they can do? If so, what a letdown.

 

Doubt it. I really doubt it. At such low clocks (for Pascal) performance will be the same as a 980 was in laptops. Fucking disgrace

 

That too - hot and loud laptops. Fun times...

Well I mean Nvidia does like their mullah/Monies and mobile versions of desktop GPUs cost as much or more than their desktop counterparts.

[AlTech]

1 minute ago, Kobz360 said:

Should perform like a 1070ish.. not bad at all tbh, especially for a laptop. I'm very interested as to how much gaming laptops with this GPU will cost. 

 

Battery life with this GPU will probably still be garbage but that's to be expected. 

Expect the same price as current GTX 980M laptops or higher. The 1080M has the same or similar MSRP as the 980M and 980 for notebooks did.

[don_svetlio]

2 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Well I mean Nvidia does like their mullah/Monies and mobile versions of desktop GPUs cost as much or more than their desktop counterparts.

That is no excuse - don't promise shit you can't deliver...

[hex4]

I don't see any fail here?

It's faster than any 980, it's TDP is reasonable for a ultra high end laptop GPU too?

 

Am i missing something or is it the same guys again?

[Imglidinhere]

6 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

And the 980 for notebooks would probably be around the same as this POS. goddamn it. the low clocks make Pascal useless.

$50 says it smokes the 980 by 70%.  

 

Besides, AMD might take the market back in most cases here, given that the RX 480M and yet-to-be-seen RX 490M *TAKES BAG OF SALT* might honestly annihilate said market with dirt cheap upgrades for stunning performance... you know... one can hope. :3

[Lays]

5 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

No, it is not. We've had 980s in laptops for several months. This is, at best, a 10% increase. Is that the best they can do? If so, what a letdown.

 

Doubt it. I really doubt it. At such low clocks (for Pascal) performance will be the same as a 980 was in laptops. Fucking disgrace

 

That too - hot and loud laptops. Fun times...

It's a lot more than 10%.  Look at the charts below, it's 4,000 graphics score higher than a 980 desktop variant, and the same graphics score as a 980 TI.  Some quick math for ya:  13.2k / 16.9k = 78%.  So we're getting a 22% increase in performance over the current 980 desktop variant laptops.

Read what I said about my 980 Classified at over 1600 mhz, no desktop variant 980 laptop is going to be doing that lol.

 

 

 

 

Look, here is a 1609 mhz 980 Classified with 9312 mhz memory, it gets 17.8k GPU score.   This laptop is getting 17k at stock settings.  That's fucking ridiculous lol.

 

 

[JoaoPRSousa]

I hope the 1070M and 1080M make it to the market before October or so, so that (hopefully) the prices on laptops with 970M/980Ms drop...

[A/C]

16 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

The GTX 1080M specs have been revealed and they are as follows

...

Which is such a shame that Nvidia didn't release the one version of the 1080 for both Mobile and Desktop.

 

On average I would expect it to be about 20-30% slower than the GTX 1080.

 

What a shame Nvidia !

If only AMD could release a mobile chip good enough so that the market could punish Nvidia. If only... but history has shown that AMD is more than capable of dropping the ball on ocasions like these, or?

[don_svetlio]

Welp, when it releases and performs like shit we'll have this conversation again. For now, enjoy the drooling over a miserable product.

1 minute ago, A/C said:

If only AMD could release a mobile chip good enough so that the market could punish Nvidia. If only... but history has shown that AMD is more than capable of dropping the ball on ocasions like these, or?

Thing is - Polaris has a much lower starting TDP so a highly binned RX 480 could perform better at 120W

[Kobz360]

5 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Expect the same price as current GTX 980M laptops or higher. The 1080M has the same or similar MSRP as the 980M and 980 for notebooks did.

https://www.mwave.com.au/product/metabox-p650rgctg01-156-notebook-i76700hq-8gb-250gb1tb-gtx980m-win-10-ab67967 (980M)

 

Yeah probably in excess of $3000AUD.. not that I'd ever buy a gaming laptop anyway but yeah. Really want to see how Polaris 11/10 and GP106 performs in laptops + their pricing. Might finally get decent gaming laptops with good performance at low prices. 

 

 

[HKZeroFive]

Can we leave out clickbait and opinionated titles out of the Tech News section? This is insane performance for a laptop. People expect too much (as always).