Post Your 3DMark scores.

[Helltech]

A new 3DMark came out today, soley called 3Dmark. I'll post my scores after work.

http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/2201/3DMark_v1.00.html

[Brendan]

Not the best CPU OC i can get. 1241 Mhz Core. Not the best Core either. Current Ambient temp is way too high.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/60713

http://www.3dmark.com/is/66434

http://www.3dmark.com/cg/60441

[TechFan@ic]

I'll post my scores once I get back on Sunday .

[Ziommm]

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/36946

Here is what I get. 3DMark kinda fails at hardware detection btw. My RAM is @1600Mhz (so it should be 800), my CPU is @4.3Ghz, and my GPU clock reaches 1100Mhz at stock clock.

But still, I guess these results make sense, since I haven't installed the latest beta drivers.

I also started to do some OC on the GPU, I already get about +500 with a 140Mhz core clock increase. Still working on the Memory clock.

[mvitkun]

gtx 480 850mhz core 1850mhz mem clock.

i5 2500k stock (turbo changed to all cores 3.5ghz)

8GB 1333mhz ram

[Dimensionz]

gtx 480 850mhz core 1850mhz mem clock.

i5 2500k stock (turbo changed to all cores 3.5ghz)

8GB 1333mhz ram

may I ask why your 2500k is running at stock speeds?

[Tr3vor]

Obviously my 550Ti didn't like the Fire Storm. This sure isn't a high end system by any means, but it gets the job done. My drivers are up to date, my CPU clock speed is 3.2Ghz, My CPU has 4 physical cores, and my RAM is 1333Mhz. this thing has crap hardware detection.

[Dimensionz]

i5 2500k @ 4.5GHZ / GTX580 @ Stock clocks (will do a re run later with the card overclocked) / 16GB RAM, see my forum sig for more system specs,

[Dimensionz]

i5 2500k @ 4.5GHZ / GTX580 @ Stock clocks (will do a re run later with the card overclocked) / 16GB RAM, see my forum sig for more system specs,

using the latest nvidia drivers btw

[mvitkun]

gtx 480 850mhz core 1850mhz mem clock.

i5 2500k stock (turbo changed to all cores 3.5ghz)

8GB 1333mhz ram

@Dimensionz because I don't have an aftermarket heatsink on my processor.

I mean I can get it to 4ghz while still staying at around 90C during prime95 after a few hours,but considering that I regularly encode and render files,and that causes it to heat up as much as p95 for extended periods of time I don't think that I should.If I were to get something like a hyper 212 that is more capable of handling the heat I would overclock,but I don't so I don't.

although if you'd like to make a generous donation to the INeedAHeatSink foundation feel free to xD.

[Helltech]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/95582

Not to shabby I don't think.

[Helltech]

Obviously my 550Ti didn't like the Fire Storm. This sure isn't a high end system by any means' date=' but it gets the job done. My drivers are up to date, my CPU clock speed is 3.2Ghz, My CPU has 4 physical cores, and my RAM is 1333Mhz. this thing has crap hardware detection. [img']http://i.imgur.com/B57XZgI.png

Actually I don't' think so dude, your CPU scores are really low for that CPU. I think your CPU isn't ramping up its clocks.

[Kruziik_Kel]

Updated earlier than expected not to bad could be better though

need to overclock the GPU some too also it detected Catalyst 12.1 (a version I have never installed) when im using 13.2 Beta 5 for some reason

[Dimensionz]

gtx 480 850mhz core 1850mhz mem clock.

i5 2500k stock (turbo changed to all cores 3.5ghz)

8GB 1333mhz ram

Hahah if I had money id consider it. :D

[Tr3vor]

Obviously my 550Ti didn't like the Fire Storm. This sure isn't a high end system by any means' date=' but it gets the job done. My drivers are up to date, my CPU clock speed is 3.2Ghz, My CPU has 4 physical cores, and my RAM is 1333Mhz. this thing has crap hardware detection. [img']http://i.imgur.com/B57XZgI.png

Actually I don't' think so dude, your CPU scores are really low for that CPU. I think your CPU isn't ramping up its clocks.

Thats odd. I agree, I was just looking at that. Those physics scores should be up there with your i7-920.

I wonder why.

[mvitkun]

i5 2500k @ 4.5GHZ / GTX580 @ Stock clocks (will do a re run later with the card overclocked) / 16GB RAM, see my forum sig for more system specs,

surprised that the gtx 580 and a 1ghz OC get you only marginally better results than mine in firestrike.

[Rollergold]

EVGA GTX 680 SC SLI (Stock Settings)

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/30923?

Something does not add up here >_>

[xAcid9]

Finally found the instability culprit when running the benchmark overclocked.

Sapphire HD7950 @1180/1600

[Helltech]

EVGA GTX 680 SC SLI (Stock Settings) http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/30923? Something does not add up here >_>

Sli is off?

EDIT - I'm not sure why but it seems like a lot of people that have a processor clock at idle clocks are getting way worse scores than someone with an older CPU that is clocked correctly. I honestly don't think it is clocking correctly.

[xAcid9]

EVGA GTX 680 SC SLI (Stock Settings) I'm not sure why but it seems like a lot of people that have a processor clock at idle clocks are getting way worse scores than someone with an older CPU that is clocked correctly. I honestly don't think it is clocking correctly.

Not so sure about that, on my last test it detected my CPU idle clock but the physics score is similar as my other test that detected the correct clock.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/106526

[Helltech]

EVGA GTX 680 SC SLI (Stock Settings) I'm not sure why but it seems like a lot of people that have a processor clock at idle clocks are getting way worse scores than someone with an older CPU that is clocked correctly. I honestly don't think it is clocking correctly.

Not so sure about that' date=' on my last test it detected my CPU idle clock but the physics score is similar as my other test that detected the correct clock. [url']http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/106526

Odd, well it is all wacky for some people, for some reason. A 2400p should be getting a better physics score than in the post above, I would think.

[Tr3vor]

As this program is, I wouldn't trust its benchmarks. it might need to be fixed.

[Helltech]

As this program is' date=' I wouldn't trust its benchmarks. it might need to be fixed.[/quote']

Well the user above just proved the idle clocks mean nothing, so its not that. Maybe the massive overclock on my 920 really does help that much.

[xAcid9]

EVGA GTX 680 SC SLI (Stock Settings) I'm not sure why but it seems like a lot of people that have a processor clock at idle clocks are getting way worse scores than someone with an older CPU that is clocked correctly. I honestly don't think it is clocking correctly.

Not so sure about that' date=' on my last test it detected my CPU idle clock but the physics score is similar as my other test that detected the correct clock. [url']http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/106526

Odd, well it is all wacky for some people, for some reason. A 2400p should be getting a better physics score than in the post above, I would think.

Indeed, maybe something wrong with his window power management. =\

[Brendan]

Finally found the instability culprit when running the benchmark overclocked.

Sapphire HD7950 @1180/1600

For a single card that seems really good.