LTT 3DMark Thread

[Jumper118]

According to the link your core is 1378 not 1591. The sheet goes by core not boost.

with gpu boost its probably best to put the boost speed as a note at the end, because some cards can have the same core but a different boost. 

[Kryptyx]

Why though? It runs at boost during the benchmark. The only reason 3Dmark uses base is because it cant accurately read the boost. In my opinion it would make more sense to report boost. As that is what it is benched at.

 

 

with gpu boost its probably best to put the boost speed as a note at the end, because some cards can have the same core but a different boost. 

Because boost clocks can't be confirmed and can fluctuate from game to game, even day to day without changing any settings. 

[Razzaa]

with gpu boost its probably best to put the boost speed as a note at the end, because some cards can have the same core but a different boost.

Good point. It would be beneficial to report both.

[Bloodkil933]

Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: i7 4790K
GPU: R9 290 + R9 290X Xfire
GPU Core: 1200
GPU Memory: 1650

Score: 18558

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4192718

 

Update to my last submission and beat my own record

[Jumper118]

Because boost clocks can't be confirmed and can fluctuate from game to game, even day to day without changing any settings. 

you can see them in gpuz. thats why you have to have gpuz open on screenshots for hwbot

[Razzaa]

you can see them in gpuz. thats why you have to have gpuz open on screenshots for hwbot

I have found that GPU-Z even flucuates with boost. It will report boost as 1480 on the main tab for example but the sensor tabs and other monitoring software will report 1520 @ load.

[Kryptyx]

I have found that GPU-Z even flucuates with boost. It will report boost as 1480 on the main tab for example but the sensor tabs and other monitoring software will report 1520 @ load.

 

That is because it fluctuates as I've said. It is hard to give an accurate number as to what the boost is actually running at. The core is all that really matters because that is always certain. Also, a lot of enthusiast disable GPU boost because of how inconsistent it can be. They overclock the core and run the card reliably at that speed.  

[Bloodkil933]

U get my updated score above @Kryptyx?

[Razzaa]

That is because it fluctuates as I've said. It is hard to give an accurate number as to what the boost is actually running at. The core is all that really matters because that is always certain. Also, a lot of enthusiast disable GPU boost because of how inconsistent it can be. They overclock the core and run the card reliably at that speed.

Using Precision x16 you can set the card to constantly run at boost. It pins it at max clocks.

[Jumper118]

That is because it fluctuates as I've said. It is hard to give an accurate number as to what the boost is actually running at. The core is all that really matters because that is always certain. Also, a lot of enthusiast disable GPU boost because of how inconsistent it can be. They overclock the core and run the card reliably at that speed.  

i would prefer is cards ran at a constant speed all the time. it improves stability. i always had my cpu's at fixed speed and voltages. i wish they would do it on gpu's to0o 

 

Using Precision x16 you can set the card to constantly run at boost. It pins it at max clocks.

that sounds like a good feature.

[Razzaa]

i would prefer is cards ran at a constant speed all the time. it improves stability. i always had my cpu's at fixed speed and voltages. i wish they would do it on gpu's to0o

that sounds like a good feature.

It is an awesome feature. I have always used MSI AB but when i read about the features Precision x16 has i switched. It also has On Screen Diagnostics. Thats how i know my boost doesn't fluctuate at all. I pin my clocks at max and then start the benchmark. That way clocks dont go up and down.

[Jumper118]

It is an awesome feature. I have always used MSI AB but when i read about the features Precision x16 has i switched. It also has On Screen Diagnostics. Thats how i know my boost doesn't fluctuate at all. I pin my clocks at max and then start the benchmark. That way clocks dont go up and down.

i use afterburner because it works with amd and nvidia cards

[Raudi_]

Benchmark:Fire Strike

CPU: i7 4770k 4.3Ghz
GPU: 2x GTX 770 
GPU Core: 1046mhz
GPU Memory: 1753

Score:11577
3DMark Link:http://www.3dmark.com/fs/2859150
PCPartPicker Link: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8zYnXL

[Raudi_]

Benchmark:  Fire Strike Extreme
CPU: i7 4770k 4.3Ghz
GPU: 2x GTX 770
GPU Core: 1046
GPU Memory: 1753

Score:  5283
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/2858969
PCPartPicker Link: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8zYnXL

[Raudi_]

Benchmark: Sky Diver
CPU: i7 4770k
GPU: 2x GTX 770
GPU Core: 1046mhz
GPU Memory: 1753mhz

Score: 30628
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/sd/2397059
PCPartPicker Link: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8zYnXL

[Jumper118]

 

Benchmark: Sky Diver

CPU: i7 4770k

GPU: 2x GTX 770

GPU Core: 1046mhz

GPU Memory: 1753mhz

Score: 30628

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/sd/2397059

PCPartPicker Link: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8zYnXL

 

you can put them all in the same post you know . 

[Raudi_]

you can put them all in the same post you know . 

Whoops I forgot about that, I'm gonna updating my scores in a bout a day or so once I get some overclocking done on these. since they have a 5% difference for ASIC Quality 89.5% for my new 770 and 85.5% for my old one.

[Ray Saldanha]

This thread should be called... "make your upper range graphics card look like shit".... Ive got a 280x btw

[Najuno]

This thread should be called... "make your upper range graphics card look like shit".... Ive got a 280x btw

 

And since no one is interested in what you think this thred should be called and you are not even able to post your results your posts should be deleted.

 

Instead of appreciate people that do all this work and coming up with spread sheets, you come up with nonsense.

[Ray Saldanha]

And since no one is interested in what you think this thred should be called and you are not even able to post your results your posts should be deleted.

Instead of appreciate people that do all this work and coming up with spread sheets, you come up with nonsense.

Do you not have a sense of humor or sarcasm.... Obviously I'm blown away by the results that some of these guys are choosing...First get a grasp of the English language and understand the tone of what someone else is saying before you comment...

[Najuno]

Do you not have a sense of humor or sarcasm.... Obviously I'm blown away by the results that some of these guys are choosing...First get a grasp of the English language and understand the tone of what someone else is saying before you comment...

Yeah sure because you tell me so I think I should get more English classes, thank you.

 

And maybe you can stop giving me good advise, because your grammar is off. Maybe you can join me in class ?

 

EDIT: You know what? Let's not make a mess out of this thread here. I will only reply OT. If you have more that you want to tell me or teach me in English please write me a PM, thank you.

[Jumper118]

This thread should be called... "make your upper range graphics card look like shit".... Ive got a 280x btw

why? you could say that about any graph with different gpu's on it. my 6850's and 480's aren't the fastest cards on the list, but you are suppose to compare to similar pc configs and hardware. everyone knows a 280X isn't going to beat 980 sli, but can you beat all the other 280X's and gtx770's?

[Ray Saldanha]

why? you could say that about any graph with different gpu's on it. my 6850's and 480's aren't the fastest cards on the list, but you are suppose to compare to similar pc configs and hardware. everyone knows a 280X isn't going to beat 980 sli, but can you beat all the other 280X's and gtx770's?

I was not being serious.... Should have included an

[Real_PhillBert]

I was not being serious.... Should have included an

Your 280X would destroy my 570  :angry:

 

You guys all suck.

[Ray Saldanha]

Your 280X would destroy my 570 :angry:

You guys all suck.