LTT Forums CPU Overclocking Database!

[DildorTheDecent]

1 hour ago, Nup said:

Yeah I'm happy enough it's stable at 4.7.

 

To be frank I was going to keep it at that, I know 1.3 and over is a lot for daily use. But hey, it's should hold together for another few years  

 

whats yours at? 

Never had a 3770K. 3570K was dailied at 4.6GHz 1.31V anything higher was unobtainable for 24/7

2700K: 4.8GHz 1.4V

5820K: 4.7GHz 1.28V sig says 4.8 1.3V but cba to update

[Nup]

On 24/08/2016 at 7:54 PM, DildorTheDecent said:

Never had a 3770K. 3570K was dailied at 4.6GHz 1.31V anything higher was unobtainable for 24/7

2700K: 4.8GHz 1.4V

5820K: 4.7GHz 1.28V sig says 4.8 1.3V but cba to update

Damn. That's a good few! Do you buy and sell or keep em all? 

Good bit of variance between them. But at least the other ivy bridge chip is about where I got to. Also regrettably the 4.7 clock was stable 6+ hrs on Aida 64, but TW:warhammmer didn't like it :L 

 

also that 5820k has a nice OC on it. 

[DildorTheDecent]

42 minutes ago, Nup said:

Damn. That's a good few! Do you buy and sell or keep em all? 

Good bit of variance between them. But at least the other ivy bridge chip is about where I got to. Also regrettably the 4.7 clock was stable 6+ hrs on Aida 64, but TW:warhammmer didn't like it :L 

 

also that 5820k has a nice OC on it. 

I still have the 3570K (delidded) and the 2700K. 

[pmf026]

Note: Latest X99-E WS bios (ver.3302) performs a bit slower, but much much more stable than 3201. Cooled by Noctua NH-D15. Ambient temp. +25.3°C

VccSA is at 1.28V and VccIO at 1.25v (1.35 max), vccin 1.95 (1.98 max), uncore x31 at 1v

[King_Tuna]

Have OC'd my Q8400 to 3.55 GHz.

 

It passed 1 hour Aida64 Stablity Test and Cinebench R15 run but it failed Prime95 stress test. I have never seen bluescreen on a normal use. Does this count as stable?

 

[TheLaserCucumber]

Just finished overclocking the Athlon II X2 260 in my HTPC to 4GHz.

But i'm a bit worried about temperatures, since i'm running it on its stock cooler.

Have to look if i still have the stock cooler from the FX 8350 lying around somewhere...

And also the voltage is a bit weird.

I have set it to 1.4375V in BIOS.

 

[Cereal5]

My 5820K definitely is like 40th percentile... 4.5GHz, 1.31v at 84° on the hottest core (damn core 5)

 

 

I promise I did a 30 minute bench before this (and a 2 hour bench before that but I dropped it to 4.3 since). But I decided to go with offset overclocking this time and it turned out well, My voltage now drops to 1.024 on idle and sticks to 1.312 at full load.

 

[edit] kek can someone go in and edit my temps and cooler? i typed h110 instead of h100 and didnt realize it was entered into the database as is

[done12many2]

On 10/25/2016 at 1:56 AM, Cereal5 said:

My 5820K definitely is like 40th percentile... 4.5GHz, 1.31v at 84° on the hottest core (damn core 5)

 

I promise I did a 30 minute bench before this (and a 2 hour bench before that but I dropped it to 4.3 since). But I decided to go with offset overclocking this time and it turned out well, My voltage now drops to 1.024 on idle and sticks to 1.312 at full load.

 

[edit] kek can someone go in and edit my temps and cooler? i typed h110 instead of h100 and didnt realize it was entered into the database as is

 

You should really use Adaptive Voltage instead of Offset.  Adaptive allows the voltage to drop all the way to the stock idle voltage which is usually mid .7v area.  Great for idle temps.

 

You ain't kidding about temps if you have a core hitting 84c during AIDA64, which isn't really stressful at all.  You'd probably be in the 95c + area with something like OCCT.  

[Thomas212]

is a AMD FX4300 black edition good for a first CPU

 

[Cereal5]

2 hours ago, done12many2 said:

 

You should really use Adaptive Voltage instead of Offset.  Adaptive allows the voltage to drop all the way to the stock idle voltage which is usually mid .7v area.  Great for idle temps.

 

You ain't kidding about temps if you have a core hitting 84c during AIDA64, which isn't really stressful at all.  You'd probably be in the 95c + area with something like OCCT.  

AIDA64 not stressful? um...lol? but yeah, my chip sucks. I'll check out adaptive once i feel like going through the process again

[done12many2]

11 hours ago, Cereal5 said:

AIDA64 not stressful? um...lol? but yeah, my chip sucks. I'll check out adaptive once i feel like going through the process again

 

Yeah, AIDA64 is one of the least stressful stability tests out there.  I'm not saying it's a bad test as I use it myself, but I use it along with several other test to determine stability.  AIDA64 is the coolest running of all my test unless I run the FPU test only by itself on AIDa64.  If you haven't tried that yet, please do and you'll see what I mean.  Otherwise, when I do run AIDA64 it's with CPU, Cache, and FPU selected only.  Selecting anything else only makes the test run even cooler and the test will run a lot longer without exposing any errors.

 

OCCT is a great test that generally finds errors a lot faster than something like Prime95 and without all of the power being pushed through your HWE chip.  It's going to get quite a bit warmer than AIDA64, but that's to be expected if you are actually trying to make sure that your overclock is stable. 

 

Bottom line is, a lot of people like to use AIDA64 because it's easy to pass.  It's up to you.

[ZeroDanvx187]

Asus Strix Z270G Gaming Quick OC profile pre loaded in new 0701 bios see link below for pics. have used it personally  and its really nice and stable. 

 

 

 

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107565988651031737956/posts/2C5iS3JhkwE?sfc=false

 

[done12many2]

4 hours ago, ZeroDanvx187 said:

Asus Strix Z270G Gaming Quick OC profile pre loaded in new 0701 bios see link below for pics. have used it personally  and its really nice and stable. 

 

 

 

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107565988651031737956/posts/2C5iS3JhkwE?sfc=false

 

 

That's quite a bit of voltage for 5 GHz.  Those profiles provided by Asus are a nice quick start to overclocking, but you don't want to run them at those settings indefinitely.

[ZeroDanvx187]

1 hour ago, done12many2 said:

 

That's quite a bit of voltage for 5 GHz.  Those profiles provided by Asus are a nice quick start to overclocking, but you don't want to run them at those settings indefinitely.

voltage is only at 1.4 at pick

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, ZeroDanvx187 said:

voltage is only at 1.4 at pick

 

1.4v is fine, but it's usually a lot more than needed.  Something tells me that if you put a real load on it, you'll be running very hot. 

 

As an example, my 7700k will run 5 GHz at less than 1.3v.  It takes 1.2v to boot windows and 1.29v to run Prime95 blend at 5 GHz. 

 

I was simply letting you know that you're running a lot more voltage than necessary when you use automatic overclocks.  They are designed to work with all 7700k CPUs of different quality, which is why they run voltage high. 

[ZeroDanvx187]

12 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

1.4v is fine, but it's usually a lot more than needed.  Something tells me that if you put a real load on it, you'll be running very hot. 

 

As an example, my 7700k will run 5 GHz at less than 1.3v.  It takes 1.2v to boot windows and 1.29v to run Prime95 blend at 5 GHz. 

 

I was simply letting you know that you're running a lot more voltage than necessary when you use automatic overclocks.  They are designed to work with all 7700k CPUs of different quality, which is why they run voltage high. 

Thanks for that info Champ. i though i was right when i was talking with someone about not needing to boost up the valtage on this to get that kind of speeds. i normally just run stock clocks no oc just saw it there and thought i would give it a try. 

i did a stress test for 5min with intel extreme tuning utility, and temps were between 60-70c it never reached that i think 68c was max it got to with my corsair h100i v2 push pull config set to balance in corsair link app. 

 

 

[DeathPheonix]

24/7 overclock, did not bother to run the stress test that long though.Using H110iGTX with balanced fan profile

So bus speed is 100Mhz in bios, however, it shows 99.98 for some reason..Multiplier is x45.0, I've put down as 4.5Ghz

CPU voltage is set to adaptive mode at 1.28V

I forgot to include CPU core#5 and core#6 temps in AIDA64 room temp is at 25C

Cinebench R15

[Mutoh]

Pushed my 6700k about as far as it will go (or at least as far as I can personally get it). Will probably downclock back to 4.6-4.7Ghz cause I wasn't a fan of some of the temps I was getting near the end of the test.

 

 

 

 

Not sure if these guys resize automatically. If not then I'll be sure to resize them  

 

[AmbellinaThePrise]

Okay, so I applied the TPU II settings in my ASUS ROG  Maximus IX Z270 BIOS as I'm new to  overclocking and figured this would handle it fine, but I wanted to ask anyway to err on the side of caution. I'm running at 4.9GHz on my i7 7700k, being cooled by an NZXT Kraken x52, and it in the CAM software it is showing VCORE of 1.38v, that in 5 minutes of Prime 95 went up to 1.41v max, and my temps were reaching a maximum of 89.75c averaged between the cores, with the two hottest cores both hitting 96c. That seems high, and I'm assuming some of  that is to do with the voltage, presumably. Would  it suit me better to overclock manually and have it run at a lower voltage? Does the ASUS auto overclocking get a bit liberal with voltage? Or is that just the lowest stable voltage my chip is able to run at? 

[dexT]

 

[vrudolph]

i got 4.7ghz on 1.28v on 6700k is it rare? or just average? 

[vrudolph]

J

[done12many2]

1 hour ago, Jennifer Lawrence said:

i got 4.7ghz on 1.328v on 6700k is it rare? or just average? 

58 minutes ago, Jennifer Lawrence said:

http://valid.x86.fr/0r41ak via @CPUZ_VALID

 

Can't say that it's good or bad, but when you run AIDA64, run CPU, FPU and Cache only.  Don't check the rest of the stuff as it makes the test even easier to pass, which is not great.  AIDA64 is already too weak of a test and making it easier is far from good stability wise.

[David89]

R5 1600, 4,175 on Air:

http://valid.x86.fr/24fe2z

 

Unfortunately i can't get my memory to more than 2400 Mhz, although it's G.Skill 3200 Single-Ranked.  24/7 OC is 3.95 GHz though...extremely quiet and very cool system with 3.95 GHz and more than enough power. RX 480 is running at 1400 MHz and it's still GPU Bottlenecked pretty much everywhere (even Fallout 4). But i have to say...best bump was 25-30 FPS to 80-90 FPS in Metro: Last Light on Linux. Never thought, OpenGL is such a resource hog...

[Felmbo]

Hi everyone,

 

I just got my R7 1700 and the Asus Crosshair " with the latest BIOS" with the EK PE240 cooler and the RAM is the corsair LED 16GB @ 3200Hz

 

and I just cant pass the AIDA64 stability test if I OC the CPU to 3.9 @1.375V the RAM was stable at 3200Hz which is good.

 

now i'm just running the system @3.85.

 

any idea to boost the CPU and pass the stability test and make it running 24/7?