Jump to content

Intel Haswell

mnm0710

Looks like Intel's Haswell family of processors will only be releasing at Computex 2013 versus CES. Sometime between May 27th and June 7th it appears. I think many people were hoping it would release around March but it does not appear to be the case :(

Haswell Launch Delayed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame, seems like the lack of competition from AMD is meaning that Intel can relax a bit. Although, ARM is coming up so hopefully that might bolster them a bit more. That, or Intel are just fine tuning their CPUs to make for a much smoother release..here's hoping. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

will haswell be upgrade worthy from sandy bridge you think? like ivybridge wasn't a worthwhile upgrade from sandybridge?

AMD 8350 // 8 GB Corsair Ram // PNY 780 Ti // Asus 1080p Monitor // Antec 120mm AIO // CM Quickfire TK w/ Custom Caps  // RAT 5 mouse // Audio Technica m50x // Behringer 4-line + Line6 8-line Audio Interfaces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be, IB was more of tick, where as Haswell will be a 'tock'. Are you familiar with Intel's 'tick tock' approach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep i am, tock is new architecture whereas tick is more of a shrinking process i think?

AMD 8350 // 8 GB Corsair Ram // PNY 780 Ti // Asus 1080p Monitor // Antec 120mm AIO // CM Quickfire TK w/ Custom Caps  // RAT 5 mouse // Audio Technica m50x // Behringer 4-line + Line6 8-line Audio Interfaces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's for gaming, I don't think you will need to upgrade. Sandy still kicks ass and I am going to keep my I5 for a while I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep i am' date=' tock is new architecture whereas tick is more of a shrinking process i think? [/quote']

Yep, that's right. So Sandy Bridge was a tock because it was anew architecture, whereas Ivy Bridge is tick because it is on a smaller die. ( 22nm ).

So Haswell will be a brand new architecture on 22nm process, if the performance gains are anything like they were between Nehalem > Sandy Bridge then you can expect good things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's for gaming' date=' I don't think you will need to upgrade. Sandy still kicks ass and I am going to keep my I5 for a while I guess.[/quote']

i was thinking that! even my 2500k at 4ghz kicks ass!

AMD 8350 // 8 GB Corsair Ram // PNY 780 Ti // Asus 1080p Monitor // Antec 120mm AIO // CM Quickfire TK w/ Custom Caps  // RAT 5 mouse // Audio Technica m50x // Behringer 4-line + Line6 8-line Audio Interfaces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure? I hope not... ): I really need an upgrade from my 955BE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure? I hope not... ): I really need an upgrade from my 955BE

No one can be sure until it's released, but going off past experience, you would expect a good upgrade, especially from your Phenom 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure? I hope not... ): I really need an upgrade from my 955BE
No one can be sure until it's released' date=' but going off past experience, you would expect a good upgrade, especially from your Phenom 2.[/quote']

Let's hope so. I'm hoping to overclock the living daylight out of it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haswell is a different architecture based off of Ivy, like Nehalem before Sandy Bridge, but so far the rumors floating claims10% better IPC per clock, but take that with a grain of salt because the instructions per cycle hasn't increased from Kentsfield, Yorkfield, Nehalem, Westmere, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge.

This is all speculation of course.

▶ Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Einstein◀

Please remember to mark a thread as solved if your issue has been fixed, it helps other who may stumble across the thread at a later point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they change the sockets I doubt very many people will upgrade. A motherboard AND a CPU is huge and expensive upgrade. Especially as there won't be much choice in motherboards.

Feel free to PM for any water-cooling questions. Check out my profile for more ways to contact me.

 

Add me to your circles on Google+ here or you can follow me on twitter @deadfire19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

~10% IPC bump and a bigger jump for the IGP... meaning it's not really worth it for most gaming users in my opinion. Great HTPC/mobile processor though.

3930k | RIVBE | 32GB Dominator Plat. | Titan XP | Intel 750 1.6TB | Mellanox 10Gb NIC | AX1200i 

Custom TJ07 | 2xD5 pumps | EK Supremacy EVO | EK Titan XP | EK RIVBE Block | Cu Tubing | 25x120mm Rad

Samsung U28D590D 4K | Leopold Otaku w/Browns | Corsair M65 | Corsair SP2500 | Sennheiser HD595

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the new socket replace the 1155 "mainstream" platform for gaming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the new socket replace the 1155 "mainstream" platform for gaming?

Yes the new socket 1150 is meant to be another replacement for Intel's mainstream platform. So those who are looking at upgrading from Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge (or anything earlier) will have to buy a new motherboard and processor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance gains are supposed to be 10-15% just like the jump from bulldozer to piledriver' date=' which isn't very encouraging .[/quote']

Haswell is a width improvement where Broadwell will be your frequency improvement, seeing any gain at all is better than no gain.

▶ Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Einstein◀

Please remember to mark a thread as solved if your issue has been fixed, it helps other who may stumble across the thread at a later point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see more of a jump like we've seen between the i7 920 and the i7 2600K .

Most likely that is going to be Broadwell. If Intel follows Tick-Tock, then we should expect 4GHz chips.

▶ Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Einstein◀

Please remember to mark a thread as solved if your issue has been fixed, it helps other who may stumble across the thread at a later point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see more of a jump like we've seen between the i7 920 and the i7 2600K .
Most likely that is going to be Broadwell. If Intel follows Tick-Tock' date=' then we should expect 4GHz chips.[/quote']

I highly doubt that as the jump from the 2500K (sandy bridge) to the 3570K (ivy bridge was ignorable), the main improvements were in the iGPU .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see more of a jump like we've seen between the i7 920 and the i7 2600K .
Most likely that is going to be Broadwell. If Intel follows Tick-Tock' date=' then we should expect 4GHz chips.[/quote'] I highly doubt that as the jump from the 2500K (sandy bridge) to the 3570K (ivy bridge was ignorable), the main improvements were in the iGPU .

Of course there wasn't any real improvements in Ivy Bridge as it was a "Tick" aka die shrink with no new microarchitecture, but following the tick-tock cycle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Tick-Tock) we can see that Haswell will have a new microarchitecture, but broad well will have the die shrink. If you look at the believed specs for Haswell you will see it is supposed to have AVX2 along with an improvement in the instructions decode queue:

haswellfrontend.png

VS:

snbfrontend.png

And the execution engine:

haswellexec.png

VS:

snbexec.png

Also Haswell is going to have more floating-point operations per second

So in conclusion Haswell will have a new microarchitecture but same clock speeds as it can have more instruction per clock, meaning better efficiency. Aka better performance W/o increasing clock speeds.

But Broadwell will *hopefully* have a clock increase(maybe FSB), as no new microarchitecture is being implemented, and they need to provide a performance increase without re-designing the chip. One thing to note is that Haswell may move some of the VRMs from the motherboard to the actual CPU die area so we may get better voltage controls hopefully meaning higher overclocks.

Sources used:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6355/intels-haswell-architecture/

▶ Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Einstein◀

Please remember to mark a thread as solved if your issue has been fixed, it helps other who may stumble across the thread at a later point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of Haswell's improvements will be moot until a fair amount of code is recompiled to utilize some of the improvements.

3930k | RIVBE | 32GB Dominator Plat. | Titan XP | Intel 750 1.6TB | Mellanox 10Gb NIC | AX1200i 

Custom TJ07 | 2xD5 pumps | EK Supremacy EVO | EK Titan XP | EK RIVBE Block | Cu Tubing | 25x120mm Rad

Samsung U28D590D 4K | Leopold Otaku w/Browns | Corsair M65 | Corsair SP2500 | Sennheiser HD595

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of Haswell's improvements will be moot until a fair amount of code is recompiled to utilize some of the improvements.

Only in terms of AVX2 and FMA because no other CPU currently has those instruction sets therefore nobody has programmed for them. All other operations should get a boost also w/o any re-coding because of the changes in the front end and the execution engine.

▶ Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Einstein◀

Please remember to mark a thread as solved if your issue has been fixed, it helps other who may stumble across the thread at a later point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of Haswell's improvements will be moot until a fair amount of code is recompiled to utilize some of the improvements.
Only in terms of AVX2 and FMA because no other CPU currently has those instruction sets therefore nobody has programmed for them. All other operations should get a boost also w/o any re-coding because of the changes in the front end and the execution engine.

Agreed, but will be needed nonetheless to really show the improvements over the current gen. A simple IPC increase isn't all that special or even needed over current gen parts. I just think Haswell is getting a lot of hype and there are going to be some disappointed people out there.

3930k | RIVBE | 32GB Dominator Plat. | Titan XP | Intel 750 1.6TB | Mellanox 10Gb NIC | AX1200i 

Custom TJ07 | 2xD5 pumps | EK Supremacy EVO | EK Titan XP | EK RIVBE Block | Cu Tubing | 25x120mm Rad

Samsung U28D590D 4K | Leopold Otaku w/Browns | Corsair M65 | Corsair SP2500 | Sennheiser HD595

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×