Can't over clock on B450

[Staidey]

Guys I cant go further than +0.300v on my motherboard. Because of that I can't put more than 3.9Ghz on my CPU. Why is that happening? I have a 300w water cooling from deepcool. I can overclock it for sure.

Is there any way I can turn off that anti autism protection?

[Guest]

Im sorry what cpu was that again??

 

[The_russian]

What are your full specs? And when you say you can't overclock more than .3V, do you mean it won't let you or it isn't stable? Another thing,  I haven't overclocked a Ryzen CPU but adding .3V seems like way too much.

[Staidey]

Just now, The_russian said:

What are your full specs? And when you say you can't overclock more than .3V, do you mean it won't let you are it isn't stable? Another thing,  I haven't overclocked a Ryzen CPU but adding .3V seems like way too much.

It is not. I saw people over clock ryzen 7 2700 up to 4.7Ghz. Not X version. +0.3v is the best voltage for 3.9Ghz. CPU is stable

[-rascal-]

5 minutes ago, AdkatkaShow said:

Guys I cant go further than +0.300v on my motherboard. Because of that I can't put more than 3.9Ghz on my CPU. Why is that happening? I have a 300w water cooling from deepcool. I can overclock it for sure.

Is there any way I can turn off that anti autism protection?

 

What motherboard are you using (e.g. Make and Model) ?

What CPU are you using?

How are you overclocking your CPU (directly through BIOS, or with software in the Windows OS environment) ?

[Staidey]

2 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

What motherboard are you using (e.g. Make and Model) ?

What CPU are you using?

How are you overclocking your CPU (directly through BIOS, or with software in the Windows OS environment) ?

Ryzen 7 2700

B450 Aorus elite

Overclocking by multiplier through BIOS

 

[-rascal-]

4 minutes ago, AdkatkaShow said:

Ryzen 7 2700

B450 Aorus elite

Overclocking by multiplier through BIOS

 

 

Thanks for the additional info (next time, that should be all in your FIRST post).

 

With the +0.300V, what is BIOS reporting as the Core Voltage?

 

Is it showing something like 1.45V? 1.55V? 1.600V?

If your baseline voltage is like 1.35V, adding +0.300V to it, will make it 1.65V -- WHICH IS A LOT.

Even for a 2700X.

 

Also, what version BIOS is your board currently running?

If it is much older BIOS version, you may need to update it first.

[Nocte]

You should revisit how you overclock your CPUs if the first voltage you try is a +0.3V offset.

[Staidey]

Just now, Nocte said:

You should revisit how you overclock your CPUs if the first voltage you try is a +0.3V offset.

I were trying by a little. At +0.250 it BSOD

[Staidey]

3 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

Thanks for the additional info (next time, that should be all in your FIRST post).

 

With the +0.300V, what is BIOS reporting as the Core Voltage?

 

Is it showing something like 1.45V? 1.55V? 1.600V?

If your baseline voltage is like 1.35V, adding +0.300V to it, will make it 1.65V -- WHICH IS A LOT.

Even for a 2700X.

 

Also, what version BIOS is your board currently running?

If it is much older BIOS version, you may need to update it first.

Latest F51

[Staidey]

6 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

Thanks for the additional info (next time, that should be all in your FIRST post).

 

With the +0.300V, what is BIOS reporting as the Core Voltage?

 

Is it showing something like 1.45V? 1.55V? 1.600V?

If your baseline voltage is like 1.35V, adding +0.300V to it, will make it 1.65V -- WHICH IS A LOT.

Even for a 2700X.

 

Also, what version BIOS is your board currently running?

If it is much older BIOS version, you may need to update it first.

 

[-rascal-]

1 minute ago, AdkatkaShow said:

I were trying by a little. At +0.250 it BSOD

 

What is the Core Voltage it is being actually applied?

Like I said, if baseline voltage is 1.35V, and you are adding +0.300V to it, that is already TOO MUCH.

 

If you are adding +0.250V at once, that is quite a bit -- you should be increasing the Core Voltage little by little.

Little as in +0.025V or +0.050V at a time.

 

Ryzen 2700 should be able to reach 4.0 GHz ~ 4.1 GHz with around 1.4xxV, or even with 1.3xxV in some cases.

4.2 GHz you are looking at something above 1.40V.

If you are pushing 1.5V+, and still only getting 3.9 GHz...

[Tristerin]

100% what @-rascal- 

 

[Staidey]

3 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

What is the Core Voltage it is being actually applied?

Like I said, if baseline voltage is 1.35V, and you are adding +0.300V to it, that is already TOO MUCH.

 

If you are adding +0.250V at once, that is quite a bit -- you should be increasing the Core Voltage little by little.

Little as in +0.025V or +0.050V at a time.

 

Ryzen 2700 should be able to reach 4.0 GHz ~ 4.1 GHz with around 1.4xxV, or even with 1.3xxV in some cases.

4.2 GHz you are looking at something above 1.40V.

If you are pushing 1.5V+, and still only getting 3.9 GHz...

Like I said before, I were doing it by little starting from +0.0v I am not going to put 0.3v at once. That is a 200$ CPU. I inserted some pictures

[Staidey]

10 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

What is the Core Voltage it is being actually applied?

Like I said, if baseline voltage is 1.35V, and you are adding +0.300V to it, that is already TOO MUCH.

 

If you are adding +0.250V at once, that is quite a bit -- you should be increasing the Core Voltage little by little.

Little as in +0.025V or +0.050V at a time.

 

Ryzen 2700 should be able to reach 4.0 GHz ~ 4.1 GHz with around 1.4xxV, or even with 1.3xxV in some cases.

4.2 GHz you are looking at something above 1.40V.

If you are pushing 1.5V+, and still only getting 3.9 GHz...

I puted  +0.1v 3.9Ghz and windows crash

[Staidey]

12 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

What is the Core Voltage it is being actually applied?

Like I said, if baseline voltage is 1.35V, and you are adding +0.300V to it, that is already TOO MUCH.

 

If you are adding +0.250V at once, that is quite a bit -- you should be increasing the Core Voltage little by little.

Little as in +0.025V or +0.050V at a time.

 

Ryzen 2700 should be able to reach 4.0 GHz ~ 4.1 GHz with around 1.4xxV, or even with 1.3xxV in some cases.

4.2 GHz you are looking at something above 1.40V.

If you are pushing 1.5V+, and still only getting 3.9 GHz...

Base voltage is 1.0V

[Staidey]

13 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

What is the Core Voltage it is being actually applied?

Like I said, if baseline voltage is 1.35V, and you are adding +0.300V to it, that is already TOO MUCH.

 

If you are adding +0.250V at once, that is quite a bit -- you should be increasing the Core Voltage little by little.

Little as in +0.025V or +0.050V at a time.

 

Ryzen 2700 should be able to reach 4.0 GHz ~ 4.1 GHz with around 1.4xxV, or even with 1.3xxV in some cases.

4.2 GHz you are looking at something above 1.40V.

If you are pushing 1.5V+, and still only getting 3.9 GHz...

I put +0.2v and, windows crashs. My CPU crashes because no enough voltage. 

[-rascal-]

3 minutes ago, AdkatkaShow said:

Like I said before, I were doing it by little starting from +0.0v I am not going to put 0.3v at once. That is a 200$ CPU. I inserted some pictures

 

Oh, okay I see.

1.296V is very close to the stock voltage of the Ryzen 2700.

So it looks like your motherboard is not applying the +0.300V change, or something is up.

If +0.300V is already being applied on top of the baseline, then 0.900V Core Voltage is really low.

 

Curious, do you have any of the power saving features enabled or set to Auto at the moment?

• Core Performance Boost
• AMD Cool N Quiet
• Global C-State Control
• etc

What have you gotten stable SO FAR that is under 3.9 GHz?

What overclocking that you get that is Windows OS stable?

Are you able to fire up CPU-Z, and take a screenshot of that?

 

I'm curious what is stable, and how much the voltage the CPU is requesting, and how much it is actually receiving.

 

 

[Staidey]

10 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

Oh, okay I see.

1.296V is very close to the stock voltage of the Ryzen 2700.

So it looks like your motherboard is not applying the +0.300V change, or something is up.

If +0.300V is already being applied on top of the baseline, then 0.900V Core Voltage is really low.

 

Curious, do you have any of the power saving features enabled or set to Auto at the moment?

• Core Performance Boost
• AMD Cool N Quiet
• Global C-State Control
• etc

What have you gotten stable SO FAR that is under 3.9 GHz?

What overclocking that you get that is Windows OS stable?

Are you able to fire up CPU-Z, and take a screenshot of that?

 

I'm curious what is stable, and how much the voltage the CPU is requesting, and how much it is actually receiving.

 

 

it is currently at +0.254 but it is not stable. If i fire up a game like watchdogs 2, it will crash

[Guest]

 

 

SOC voltage I think he increased + 0.3v not cpu v-core

[Staidey]

Just now, ShrimpBrime said:

 

 

SOC voltage I think he increased + 0.3v not cpu v-core

Do you really think i dont know the difference between System On Chip and Core Voltage? LMAO

[Guest]

Just now, AdkatkaShow said:

Do you really think i dont know the difference between System On Chip and Core Voltage? LMAO

I really do think that because the screen shot of the bios showed SOC voltage..... Incase you couldnt read it maybe??

[-rascal-]

7 minutes ago, AdkatkaShow said:

it is currently at +0.254 but it is not stable. If i fire up a game like watchdogs 2, it will crash

 

 

Can you also see what HWMonitor or HWInfo is showing for the Core Voltage?

 

Why is it showing such a low Core Voltage...

CPU-Z is showing the CPU is running at full 3.9 GHz speed, and it not dropping the CPU Ratio down (e.g. Cool N Quiet kicking in).

If the CPU is idling, and frequency is decreased to like 1.4 GHz (100 MHz x 14), then something under 1.00V makes sense.

 

Do you have the Ryzen power plan installed / selected already?

 

 

2 minutes ago, ShrimpBrime said:

I really do think that because the screen shot of the bios showed SOC voltage..... Incase you couldnt read it maybe??

Wait, shouldn't the 1.296V be Core Voltage, rather than SoC Voltage??

[Staidey]

2 minutes ago, ShrimpBrime said:

I really do think that because the screen shot of the bios showed SOC voltage..... Incase you couldnt read it maybe??

You dont see the SOC Votage set to Auto?

[Staidey]

1 minute ago, -rascal- said:

 

Can you also see what HWMonitor or HWInfo is showing for the Core Voltage?

 

Why is it showing such a low Core Voltage...

CPU-Z is showing the CPU is running at full 3.9 GHz speed, and it not dropping the CPU Ratio down (e.g. Cool N Quiet kicking in).

If the CPU is idling, and frequency is decreased to like 1.4 GHz (100 MHz x 14), then something under 1.00V makes sense.

 

Do you have the Ryzen power plan installed / selected already?

 

 

Wait, shouldn't the 1.296V be Core Voltage, rather than SoC Voltage??

that is because i fired the stress test up, so you can see what is the maximum voltage