AUDIO ON Should I render out the whole 10 hour thing? (This will take me roughly 60 hours for 1 hour of it)

[WillOfTheLand]

[nick name]

What is it?

[kelvinhall05]

Just now, nick name said:

What is it?

A meme that isn't funny.

 

 

 

What kind of hardware are you rendering on where one hours of video takes 60 to render?

[WillOfTheLand]

1 minute ago, kelvinhall05 said:

A meme that isn't funny.

 

 

 

What kind of hardware are you rendering on where one hours of video takes 60 to render?

Really horrible, we're talking a FX CPU and a AMD R7 card.

Also I think it's funny.

[Statik]

60 hours to render 1 hour? What's your specs bruv?

[Statik]

1 hour ago, WillOfTheLand said:

Really horrible, we're talking a FX CPU and a AMD R7 card.

If you want to melt your PC for literally 25 days for like 25 views, send it brother.

[WillOfTheLand]

Just now, Statik said:

If you want to melt your PC for literally 25 days for like 25 views, send it brother.

That's the thing, during the render it was using like maybe 15% CPU usage, not sure as to why, could probably cut the time down a lot if I found out why but it wouldn't be to big of a impact at least. 

[Statik]

1 hour ago, WillOfTheLand said:

That's the thing, during the render it was using like maybe 15% CPU usage, not sure as to why, could probably cut the time down a lot if I found out why but it wouldn't be to big of a impact at least. 

What are you rendering in? And what CPU do you have?

[Kilrah]

Technically, render just the exact length of the loop and then contatenate it to itself a few times with a joiner program, then do that with the one you just did... Done in 10 minutes and no CPU time.

 

But yeah, not worth even that.

[WillOfTheLand]

3 minutes ago, Statik said:

What are you rendering in? And what CPU do you have?

PP and it's a fx8350. 

[LogicalDrm]

*** Thread locked ***

 

Please reserve these type of posts to your status updates.