Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Cylon Agent

Graphics Card(s) for Blender / Rendering

Recommended Posts

Posted · Original PosterOP

I've been getting more and more into video editing, CG and Blender and thinking I may need an upgrade to speed up render times. I'm currently running a:

 

Xeon E5-2690 (8 core 2.9 - 3.8 GHz)

64 GB DDR3 (1600) 

GTX 1060 6GB and a Quadro 4000 (Quadro is used only to run the display to keep the viewport from freezing during renders)

Corsair RM 850 power supply

 

I've been thinking of a second GTX 1060, but 6GB is getting to be rather limited in 2020. A 1080 is a thought given the extra cores, clock and VRAM (two 1080's over time). Then I am also considering cards like a Vega 64 and even a 5700 XT. I do also game on this workstation, VR in particular, as it runs quite cool and has plenty of IO. Whatever card I get, I will likely double up on over time, so two Vegas or whatever and so one issue I'm having is comparing performance of two slightly older cards with one modern RTX card. No single right answer here but I'd appreciate any thoughts. 


Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm told GTX 1070s are beastly rendering cards, and they're also fairly cheap on the used market.

 

I'd strongly advise against Radeon Navi cards as they're having a lot of driver issues at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever cards you go with (personally not recommend it amd, those driver issues will kill your workflow) don’t forget to join the LTT folding team next fall for the currently annual folding month


Bethesda PC:   R7 3700X  -  Crosshair VIII hero  -  Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB@3.2GHz -  Strix 1070Ti  -  Samsung 860 Evo 256GB  -  WD Blue 2TB SSD -  Lian Li PC-011D  -  H100i RGB Platinum SE  -  Rm650x

CrumpleBox V3:  Xeon X5680  -  Asus X58 Sabertooth  -  DDr3 16GB@1.33Ghz  -  PNY OC GTX 1060 3GB- XFX Ghost HD 7770 -  TT smart RGB 700W  -  

Fractal Design Define C  -  120GB Samsung 850 Pro  -  1TB Hitachi@7200RPM   -  LTT Edition Chromax NH-D15 ?

Perhiperals:  Gateway 900p60 monitor  -  Dell 1024x768@75  -  Logi. G403 Carbon  -  Logi. G502  -  SteSer. Arctis 5  -  SteSer. Rival 110 - Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD graphics cards are excellent for blender. For the high end, you could opt for a Radeon VII, but for a budget minded approach, an RX 580 8GB is a great call.


I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k (won) - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Kill Trident Z RGB - Force MP500 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - The venerated Hyper 212 Evo (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G2 650W - Black and green theme, Razer branwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

Linux Proliant ML150 G6:

Dual Xeon X5560 - 24GB ECC DDR3 - GTX 750 TI - old Seagate 1.5TB HDD - Dark moded Ubuntu (and Win7, cuz why not)

 

EVGA G3 threadSeasonic Focus threadUserbenchmark (Et al.) is trash explained, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get an RTX card. Blender rendering with OptiX backend utilizing the RT cores is so much faster than any other render method but if you render a complex scene that need LOTS of VRAM then Radeon VII is better.

 

https://techgage.com/article/testing-blender-2-81-alpha-with-nvidia-rtx/

 

Blender-2.81-Alpha-Agent-327-OptiX-Tests

 

Blender-2.81-Alpha-Spring-OptiX-Tests.jp

 

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=blender-281-optix&num=2


| Intel i7-3770@4.2Ghz | Asus Z77-V | Zotac 980 Ti Amp! Omega | DDR3 1800mhz 4GB x4 | 300GB Intel DC S3500 SSD | 512GB Plextor M5 Pro | 2x 1TB WD Blue HDD |
 | Enermax NAXN82+ 650W 80Plus Bronze | Fiio E07K | Grado SR80i | Cooler Master XB HAF EVO | Logitech G27 | Logitech G600 | CM Storm Quickfire TK | DualShock 4 |

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Original PosterOP

Thanks @xAcid9 Looks like the right move might be an RTX 2060/70 then, which would certainly help my gaming as well. 

 

Interesting thing about the Spring render benchmark is that CPU + GPU rendering is virtually the same as GPU alone. I've noticed this trend now with a number of renders and am at a bit of a loss as to why this would happen. Would results be more as expected (reduced times) with a larger render? Any thoughts as to what is going on there? An issue with tile size?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×