Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
BiG StroOnZ

NVIDIA unveils a 360Hz refresh rate ASUS ROG Swift Monitor w/ G-Sync

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LeSheen said:

I guess Linus can redo his experiment with shroud again.

I’m curious to see the guy with long straight dark hair do it too.  He was apparently good with predicting movement on low refresh rates but higher fps which is sort of the opposite of what is happening.


Life is like a bowl of chocolates: there are all these little crinkly paper cups everywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, That Franc said:

My hardware struggles to run games at 60 FPS so I'm probably not a part of their target audience.

Me too.  For me the hardware that fails is eyes and fingers. It doesn’t even get as far as the computer.


Life is like a bowl of chocolates: there are all these little crinkly paper cups everywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, dizmo said:

Impressive, but nothing I'd ever think about purchasing.

Same as it's not 1440p/2160p nor IPS.


Intel Core i7-8700K, 16 GB DDR4-3000, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, Microsoft Windows 10. More.

 

NVIDIA GPU SKU database:<removed>

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fully interested in running Unreal Tournament 2004 & Splinter Cell 1.

There i would get all i could from this monitor! So bomb! i can play pre-2007 games at sick FPS.


Ryzen 3600 4.33ghz . CM Hyper 212 Turbo. MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max. Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 3200 @ 3200 CL 15 (OC). Powercolor RX 5700XT Red Dragon. FD Meshify S2. Crucial P1 M.2 1TB. Corsair Vengeance 650W 80+ Silver.

 

Core 2 Duo 3.4ghz . WenjuFeng cooler . ASUS P5G41C-M LX . Crucial 1066mhz 3GB DDR2 . Gainward Golden Sample HD 4850 . Coolermaster Elite 430 . Seagate 160GB IDE 7200RPM . BeQuiet System Power 9 400w 80+ Bronze

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, huilun02 said:

But the human eye can only see 30fps

lol are you dumb? We can only see 24FPS, only fukn gods and demigods can see a whopping 30.

 

 

 

 

Yes I am joking, just need to clarify that for the special peeps out there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But does it have 10 bit panel with accurate colors and good blacks? i dont think so, i had 200hz monitor and it was shitty.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TehStranger said:

lol are you dumb? We can only see 24FPS, only fukn gods and demigods can see a whopping 30.

 

 

 

 

Yes I am joking, just need to clarify that for the special peeps out there.

It’s like these constant statements I keep seeing about humans being able to fly.  I stood outside and flapped my arms but all I got was stares from the neighbors.


Life is like a bowl of chocolates: there are all these little crinkly paper cups everywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Bombastinator said:

It’s like these constant statements I keep seeing about humans being able to fly.  I stood outside and flapped my arms but all I got was stares from the neighbors.

git gud u scrub


One day I will be able to play Monster Hunter Frontier in French/Italian/English on my PC, it's just a matter of time... 4 5 6 7 8 9 years later: It's finally coming!!!

Phones: iPhone 4S/SE | LG V10 | Lumia 920

Laptops: Macbook Pro 15" (mid-2012) | Compaq Presario V6000

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Original PosterOP

 


                                                                                    .:. Taking us further, and further from entropy [ .:.

Spoiler

                                             How to free up space on your SSD                                                    

Spoiler
Spoiler

                                                                        Kymatica Revision 3.5

 

CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k @ 4.3GHz Motherboard: ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 GPU: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ~ TU116-400-A1 ~ (OC 6G 2x Windforce) Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 16GB @ 2133MHz @ 9-10-11-28 SSD: Crucial M500 240GB (OS/Programs/Path of Exile/Grim Dawn) HDD1: WD 1TB Blue (Diablo III/Other Games/Storage/Media) HDD2: Seagate Barracuda 7.2K 500GB (Backup) HDD3: WD Caviar 7.2K 400GB (Backup) HDD4: WD Elements TB External WDBWLG0040HBK-NESN (Backup/Additional Storage)  CPU Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H100 in Pull (w/ 2x Delta FFB1212EH 120mm) Case Fans: Noctua NF F12 industrialPPC-2000 (x3 120mm) PSU: Seasonic X-Series X-1050 1050W Case: Cooler Master HAF 922 Monitor: Samsung C27F396 Curved 27-Inch Freesync Monitor Keyboard: Cooler Master Storm Trigger-Z (Cherry MX Brown Switches) Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD Mousepad: Corsair MM350 Premium Audio: Logitech X 2.1 Speaker System Headset: Corsair VOID Stereo Gaming Headset (w/ Sennheiser 3D G4ME 7.1 Surround Amplifier) OS: Windows 10 Pro (Version 1903)

 

                                                                                                       

Link to post
Share on other sites

EXTREME!


CPU: Intel i7 9700K@5.3GHz SC/DC, 5.1GHz QC, 5.0Ghz All core, AVX offset 0| Motherboard: Asus Maximus XI Hero | RAM: Patriot Viper Steel 2x8gb@3600Mhz 14-14-14-29, 1N, 1.45V| 

PSU: EVGA SuperNova 750 G3 | Mon: Samsung C27HG70 27" 144Hz Freesync - G-Sync compatible(ish) | GPU: EVGA 1080ti SC Black Edition w/ G12 bracket | Sound: Odac + Fiio E09K | 

Case: Fractal Design R6 TG Blackout | Storage: Corsair MP510 960gb | Cooling: CPU: Kraken X62 - GPU: Kraken X42 - both with Noctua NF-A14's |

Ryzen rig for LAN/Backup

Link to post
Share on other sites

TN is for gamers the better type of panel mostly ... as the reaction speed and vertical refresh rate combined are better than most other.

If one wants to have a decent image quality from angles, obviously they are not the target audience.

 

I don't prefer TN, but I understand why people do.


... but I'm no expert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great for those who can notice the difference, but I'd really like to see a gaming monitor that you could also use for browsing and watching video on without it looking terrible. I'd rather have a 10 bit IPS panel with accurate color at 144Hz.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, kingmustard said:

Same as it's not 1440p/2160p nor IPS.

Or, most importantly....ultra wide.


Current PC:

Spoiler

*WORK IN PROGRESS*

 

Mothballed PC:

Spoiler

 

CPU: Intel i5 4690k Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 Motherboard: MSI Z97i AC ITX

RAM: Crucial Ballistix 16GB DDR3 Storage: Kingston Fury 240GB GPU: Asus Strix GTX 970

PSU: Thermaltake TR2 Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX

Monitor: Dell P2214H x2 Mouse: Logitech MX Master Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Bombastinator said:

I’m curious to see the guy with long straight dark hair do it too.  He was apparently good with predicting movement on low refresh rates but higher fps which is sort of the opposite of what is happening.

Honestly I had the same issue when switching from 60hz to 240hz. I was so used to overcompensating with prediction on the lower refreshrate that I would miss a ton when I switched. After awhile I got use to more or less point and clicking without much prediction of where they were going to be and increased my rank in overwatch from gold to masters within a couple of months. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Blademaster91 said:

Great for those who can notice the difference, but I'd really like to see a gaming monitor that you could also use for browsing and watching video on without it looking terrible. I'd rather have a 10 bit IPS panel with accurate color at 144Hz.

Doesn't gigabyte have a 1440p 144hz monitor with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Blademaster91 said:

Great for those who can notice the difference, but I'd really like to see a gaming monitor that you could also use for browsing and watching video on without it looking terrible. I'd rather have a 10 bit IPS panel with accurate color at 144Hz.

https://www.newegg.com/black-gigabyte-aorus-fi27q-p-27/p/N82E16824012011?Item=N82E16824012011&nm_mc=AFC-RAN-COM&cm_mmc=AFC-RAN-COM&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_source=afc-PCPartPicker&AFFID=2558510&AFFNAME=PCPartPicker&ACRID=1&ASID=https%3a%2f%2fpcpartpicker.com%2fproduct%2fMqdrxr%2fgigabyte-aorus-fi27q-p-270-2560x1440-165-hz-monitor-aorus-fi27q-p&ranMID=44583&ranEAID=2558510&ranSiteID=8BacdVP0GFs-Ifar34.irFkiYprH8QIqBQ yeah I was remembering correctly it's this monitor that has 10 bit color and 144hz at 1440p. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/7/2020 at 12:04 AM, Bombastinator said:

It’s like these constant statements I keep seeing about humans being able to fly.  I stood outside and flapped my arms but all I got was stares from the neighbors.

Wait, are you saying you can't fly? omg ahaha what a total noob

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TehStranger said:

Wait, are you saying you can't fly? omg ahaha what a total noob

It’s true.  People talk about these flying machine contraptions but it’s just not the same.


Life is like a bowl of chocolates: there are all these little crinkly paper cups everywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a huge difference from 60 to 144, but I didn't notice nearly as much of a difference from 144 to 240. I can't fathom there will be a big one at 360 Hz, but the only game I can think of that my computer can play at that FPS is CS: Go and that might be the only game that does benefit from that many FPS

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/8/2020 at 3:51 PM, Eaglerino said:

There was a huge difference from 60 to 144, but I didn't notice nearly as much of a difference from 144 to 240. I can't fathom there will be a big one at 360 Hz, but the only game I can think of that my computer can play at that FPS is CS: Go and that might be the only game that does benefit from that many FPS

We're definitely approaching/pat the point of diminishing returns. The benefit to me, though is that if we get 360 or 480hz as the absolute top of the line "gamer" monitors, then hopefully it'll force basically all decent monitors to get dragged up to 120+ by default. While they are getting super common, it's still rare for an image quality focused monitor to have anything above 75-90 without paying $1000+.

 

If everyone starts making the insanely high refresh panels and internal hardware, hopefully that'll drive prices down and make it just another bullet point that every monitor is expected to have, even ones that aren't explicitly "gaming" focused. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Arika S said:

1ms panels already exist...

pixel response times, and the best i've was was the gigabyte kd25f with almost sub frame time responses

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×