Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Fabian Lioner

Liquid nitrogen cooled ryzen 9 3900x beats previous Intel world overclocking champion.

Recommended Posts

Posted · Original PosterOP

Hits 5,625 Mhz

A liquid nitrogen-cooled AMD Ryzen 9 3900x has just set a new overclocking world record in the wPrime benchmark, beating the previous title holder, the Intel Core i9-7920X.

The feat was performed by Australian overclocker jordan.hyde99, who got the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X to reach 5.63 GHz to complete the tests in just 35 seconds and 517 milliseconds. Beating the 35 seconds and 693 milliseconds of the i9-7920x.

 

I mean I can just imagine what AMD is cooking for us when it comes to future CPU generations.

 

That i9 9900KF crown is in danger and I love it!!

 

https://www.techradar.com/amp/news/liquid-nitrogen-cooled-amd-ryzen-9-3900x-is-the-new-world-overclocking-champ

images (59).jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

DAYUM


Bethesda PC:   R7 3700X  -  Crosshair VIII hero  -  Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB@3.2GHz -  Strix 1070Ti  -  Samsung 860 Evo 256GB  -  WD Blue 2TB SSD -  Lian Li PC-011D  -  H100i RGB Platinum SE  -  Rm650x

CrumpleBox V3: i7-920@4Ghz  -  MSI X58 Pro-E  -  DDr3 16GB@2Ghz  -  PNY OC GTX 1060 3GB -  TT smart RGB 700W  -  

Fractal Design Define C  -  120GB Samsung 850 Pro  -  1TB Hitachi@7200RPM   -  LTT Edition Chromax NH-D15 😎

Perhiperals:  Gateway 900p60 monitor  -  Dell 1024x768@75  -  Logi. G403 Carbon  -  Logi. G502  -  SteSer. Arctis 5  -  SteSer. Rival 110 - Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference in clock speed is kind of interesting (though the Intel chip is a little older)

 

Would like to see a single-core performance comparison with their newer chips at these clocks

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, GrockleTD said:

DAYUM

^ Yeah. IIRC the 7920X took the crown back again though, but they had to push one to around 6Ghz (might've been a bit higher?) to pass the 3900X score. 


X58-X79-X99-X299 lads: Intel HEDT Xeon/i7 Megathread

 

Big Rig (Completed) - (Current) - i7 5960X - 4.7Ghz/3.7Ghz ~ 1.3v/1.1v core/uncore - 76-78C under RealBench load- Custom Loop: 2x 360GTS with EK-ZMT/Stubbies and EK D5 pump/res combo - EVGA X99 Classified - 32GB (4x8GB) HyperX Predator DDR4 - 3200MHz CL16 - AMD Radeon VII (best TimeSpy so far: here) - 1TB 970 Evo - Corsair RM1000i - Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX TG - 6x iPPC NF-F12 2000 - LG 25UM56-P - 25" 2560x1080 at 75Hz

 

Planned Rig - i7 5820K - whatever cooler I decide on - EVGA X99 Micro 2 - 16GB (4x4GB) EVGA SSC DDR4 - EVGA XC Ultra 1660 Ti - 250GB 960 Evo - Whatever other drives I end up running - Corsair CX550 - Fractal Design Meshify C Mini - LG 25UM56-P - 25" 2560x1080 at 75Hz

Planned X58 rig - i7 950 - NH-D15S - EVGA X58 Classified SLI 3-Way - 24GB (3x8GB) HyperX Savage Red DDR3 - 2x EVGA Classified 780s - probably a basic SSD - EVGA 1600W T2 - Fractal Design Define S - 3x NF-P12 Redux + whatever other fans I end up using

Delayed Linux Box - X5670 - Intel i7 920 stock cooler - EVGA X58 Micro - 6GB (6x1GB) Corsair DDR3 most likely - AMD Radeon WX2100 - probably a basic SSD - 600W Enhance Flex ATX PSU - Old Dell slim mATX chassis - 2-3x NF-A8 fans

 

I lowkey enjoy HEDT

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Zando Bob said:

^ Yeah. IIRC the 7920X took the crown back again though, but they had to push one to around 6Ghz (might've been a bit higher?) to pass the 3900X score. 

They covered it on techquickie, the 3900X was beaten by a 9920X

 

Which, after a quick Google search, seems it was recently passed once again by a 3900X. These records are flying by.


I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k (won) - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Kill Trident Z RGB - Force MP500 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - The venerated Hyper 212 Evo (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G2 650W - Black and green theme, Razer branwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

Linux Proliant ML150 G6:

Dual Xeon X5560 - 24GB ECC DDR3 - GTX 750 TI - old Seagate 1.5TB HDD - Dark moded Ubuntu (and Win7, cuz why not)

 

EVGA G3 threadSeasonic Focus threadUserbenchmark (Et al.) is trash explained, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Zando Bob said:

but they had to push one to around 6Ghz

*looks at 3GHz OC sadly*


Bethesda PC:   R7 3700X  -  Crosshair VIII hero  -  Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB@3.2GHz -  Strix 1070Ti  -  Samsung 860 Evo 256GB  -  WD Blue 2TB SSD -  Lian Li PC-011D  -  H100i RGB Platinum SE  -  Rm650x

CrumpleBox V3: i7-920@4Ghz  -  MSI X58 Pro-E  -  DDr3 16GB@2Ghz  -  PNY OC GTX 1060 3GB -  TT smart RGB 700W  -  

Fractal Design Define C  -  120GB Samsung 850 Pro  -  1TB Hitachi@7200RPM   -  LTT Edition Chromax NH-D15 😎

Perhiperals:  Gateway 900p60 monitor  -  Dell 1024x768@75  -  Logi. G403 Carbon  -  Logi. G502  -  SteSer. Arctis 5  -  SteSer. Rival 110 - Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no idea on the background why this one particular benchmark is a battlefield right now.

 

https://hwbot.org/benchmark/wprime_-_1024m/rankings?cores=12#start=0#interval=20

 

At link above are the 12 core records. At time of writing, 9920X takes the gold now at 6.1 GHz, 3900X takes silver and bronze, with another 9920X sandwiching them in. Below that are a mix of 7920X and even more 3900X CPUs.

 

That Zen 2 has higher IPC than Skylake (in most cases) has been known since July if not earlier so why is it even newsworthy today?

 

BTW as the bench is multi-core, if we take away core count limits, the 32 core 3970X is running away with it at the top, beating out the 28 core Xeon W3175X.

 

 

I hope to see some more y-cruncher 1b subs at 12 cores. I'm in 2nd place with a 7920X run on air! I'm not extreme enough to go LN2 yet but I hope to put a chiller on it before the year is out.

https://hwbot.org/benchmark/y-cruncher_-_pi-1b/rankings?cores=12#start=0#interval=20

 


Main rig: Asus Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700k stock, Noctua D14, G.Skill Ripjaws V 3200 2x8GB, Gigabyte GTX 1650, Corsair HX750i, In Win 303 NVIDIA, Samsung SM951 512GB, WD Blue 1TB, HP LP2475W 1200p wide gamut

Gaming system: Asrock Z370 Pro4, i7-8086k stock, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance LPX RGB 3000 2x8GB, Gigabyte RTX 2070, Fractal Edison 550W PSU, Corsair 600C, Optane 900p 280GB, Crucial MX200 1TB, Sandisk 960GB, Acer Predator XB241YU 1440p 144Hz G-sync

Ryzen rig: Asrock B450 ITX, R5 3600, Noctua D9L, G.SKill TridentZ 3000C14 2x8GB, Gigabyte RTX 2070, Corsair CX450M, NZXT Manta, WD Green 240GB SSD, LG OLED55B9PLA

VR rig: Asus Z170I Pro Gaming, i7-6700T stock, Scythe Kozuti, Kingston Hyper-X 2666 2x8GB, Zotac 1070 FE, Corsair CX450M, Silverstone SG13, Samsung PM951 256GB, Crucial BX500 1TB, HTC Vive

Gaming laptop: Asus FX503VD, i5-7300HQ, 2x8GB DDR4, GTX 1050, Sandisk 256GB + 480GB SSD

Total CPU heating: i7-8086k, i3-8350k, i7-7920X, 2x i7-6700k, i7-6700T, i5-6600k, i3-6100, i7-5930k, i7-5820k, i7-5775C, i5-5675C, 2x i7-4590, i5-4570S, 2x i3-4150T, E5-2683v3, 2x E5-2650, E5-2667, R7 3700X, R5 3600, R5 2600, R7 1700

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Fabian Lioner said:

who got the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X to reach 5.63 GHz to complete the tests in just 35 seconds and 517 milliseconds. Beating the 35 seconds and 693 milliseconds of the i9-7920x.

how much money did that cost the aussie?

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, amdorintel said:

how much money did that cost the aussie?

Yeap, it's funny the lengths people go for doing an advertising stunt like this without profiting from it whatsoever (unless this was sponsored by AMD, I suppose) 

 

 


RYZEN 5 3600 | MSI GTX 1060 6GB GAMING X | 16GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE LPX 3200 DDR4 | MSI B350M MORTAR | 250GB SAMSUNG EVO 860 | 2TB SEAGATE BARRACUDA | 1TB TOSHIBA SSHD | 120GB KINGSTON SSD | WINDOWS 10 PRO | INWIN 301| BEQUIET PURE POWER 10 500W 80+ SILVER | ASUS 279H | LOGITECH Z906 | DELL KB216T | LOGITECH M185 | SONY DUALSHOCK 4

 

LENOVO IDEAPAD 510 | i5 7200U | 8GB DDR4 | NVIDIA GEFORCE 940MX | 1TB WD | WINDOWS 10 GO HOME 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mark Kaine said:

Yeap, it's funny the lengths people go for doing an advertising stunt like this without profiting from it whatsoever (unless this was sponsored by AMD, I suppose) 

 

 

who knows with the way things are going, but its not a realistic build, its a waste of money, a waste of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×