Jump to content

AMD officially announces RX 5500 series, obliterates GTX 1650

MeatFeastMan
4 minutes ago, MeatFeastMan said:

85w for 5500M, 110w for 5500. Although that's not set in stone, it's clear with lower clocks they can still beat the 1650 and be within 75w. So we might still see a 75w card.

 

There are also 5300M's popping up, so maybe a 5300 4gb could be a 75w card if it exists?

it would be neat to have a version without the 6 pin connector, for those old OEM systems that people absolutely love tossing a 1050 or 1030 into.

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

112% of the 480's performance from 71.5% of it's area is apples-to-apples comparison in that it shows how their first gen, unrefreshed architectures have allowed them to reduce the amount of silicon they have to provide per performance. I think comparing vs the 5x0's factory overclocking, which will surely come later for Navi, would obscure that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Spacehedge1 said:

112% of the 480's performance from 71.5% of it's area is apples-to-apples comparison in that it shows how their first gen, unrefreshed architectures have allowed them to reduce the amount of silicon they have to provide per performance. I think comparing vs the 5x0's factory overclocking, which will surely come later for Navi, would obscure that.

That makes sense. Definitely not something that's as useful to customers as it would be to maybe.. internal/industry chest pounding. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MeatFeastMan said:

https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/amd-radeon-rx-5500

  Reveal hidden contents

 

VideoCardz is reporting that AMD is to announce the RX 5500 series as expected today, October 7th (I wonder why..).

https://videocardz.com/82162/amd-announces-radeon-rx-5500-series-with-gddr6-memory

 

image.png.48c75b8ec60f2975b230c3c32cfcd3e1.png

 

They are apparently announcing 3 SKU's:

The RX 5500M has 4gb (Not confirmed whether GDDR5 or GDDR6 though), while the 5500 non-XT has 4gb GDDR6, and the 5500XT has 8gb GDDR6. There were rumors of a 3gb card, but it looks like those were untrue if this is anything to go by.

 

They also suggest that this card competes against the lower-end Polaris and Turing cards:

I find this very very interesting. Is this a hint at the pricing? They couldn't, could they? If they price this alongside the 1650, WOW. I don't think any of us would have expected that.

 

VideoCardz has also leaked the performance slides AMD is going to show (no resolution, but I assume it's 1080p in some form):

 

image.png.6e73713be89325a16a306c9bc79d1dc6.png

 

That is some serious butt-whooping going on there. This is far ahead of the RX 570, which is about on par with the 480. It may well be that AMD can deliver what people wanted, a true RX 570 replacement. I'd imagine these numbers would put it around the 1660 performance. That is nearly 20% faster overall than the RX 480 there, while apparently being 1.6X the performance per watt, and well..I'm not even going to bother calculating the difference over the 1650 cause that is a huge gap.

 

And by the way, the 5500 isn't the only one beating the 1650. The 5500M (Assuming that means a mobile part) is beating the full 1650 as well, despite being pitted against the 1650 mobile part. Now it remains to be seen: How are Nvidia going to respond to this? AMD have responded to a 1650 Super, they've countered that without it even being launched yet.

 

If they price the 5500 at $150, then..the RX 570 successor has finally arrived. There's a new king in town. Budget buyers finally have something worth buying.

 

EDIT: ITS OFFICIAL.

Navi will also appear in laptops too! The 5500M will appear in a number of laptops, including MSI's Alpha 15 for $999:

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/msi-alpha-15-price-specs-amd-5500m,40558.html

 

No official pricing details yet or release date however for the desktop parts. Also..there are no reference designs. All custom.

 

You also get a free game with these cards. Either Ghost Recon Breakpoint or Borderlands 3! And Wccftech are reporting (grains of salt, not official) that the 5500 will launch at $130 and 5500XT at $150. Power consumption has also been revealed by AMD at 110w TBP for the 5500.

Hey, and the 5500 has got 2CUs (1DCU) disabled, meaning we are getting a 5500XT at some point in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jurrunio said:

thin PCB? or thin cooler?

 

what they need to beat tho is the 1660, no one gives a crap to the 1650 on desktop.

The 1650 is a good option for those on OEM systems with lousy power supplies, as the 1650 can run without external power. I'm curious to see the power consumption of the RX 5500. If it too doesn't require external PCIe power connections, then there's no reason for the 1650 to exist outside CUDA.

 

Edit: 110 watts well exceeds the 75 watt limit of the PCIe slot by itself. May require some binned or underclocked chips to completely obviate the 1650. Underclocked however will probably bring it closer in line with the 1650 anyway.

My eyes see the past…

My camera lens sees the present…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SPARTAN VI said:

That makes sense. Definitely not something that's as useful to customers as it would be to maybe.. internal/industry chest pounding. :D

If AMD was really our friend, they wouldn't sell this 158mm chip to us for 50% more than the 123mm 460. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit more information: I'm pretty sure the 5500M is for laptops
image.png.4ea7a3aca21ab21fef87b73dece4cfcb.png

Specs: Motherboard: Asus X470-PLUS TUF gaming (Yes I know it's poor but I wasn't informed) RAM: Corsair VENGEANCE® LPX DDR4 3200Mhz CL16-18-18-36 2x8GB

            CPU: Ryzen 9 5900X          Case: Antec P8     PSU: Corsair RM850x                        Cooler: Antec K240 with two Noctura Industrial PPC 3000 PWM

            Drives: Samsung 970 EVO plus 250GB, Micron 1100 2TB, Seagate ST4000DM000/1F2168 GPU: EVGA RTX 2080 ti Black edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spacehedge1 said:

If AMD was really our friend, they wouldn't sell this 158mm chip to us for 50% more than the 123mm 460. 

although to some degree I agree,

 

7nm is much more expensive than 14/12nm at glofo, seeing as the card uses GDDR6 that too is more expensive.

 

Not saying the price hike is okay, just that SOME of the increase is justified.  

My Folding Stats - Join the fight against COVID-19 with FOLDING! - If someone has helped you out on the forum don't forget to give them a reaction to say thank you!

 

The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. - Socrates
 

Please put as much effort into your question as you expect me to put into answering it. 

 

  • CPU
    Ryzen 9 5950X
  • Motherboard
    Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370-GAMING 5
  • RAM
    32GB DDR4 3200
  • GPU
    Inno3D 4070 Ti
  • Case
    Cooler Master - MasterCase H500P
  • Storage
    Western Digital Black 250GB, Seagate BarraCuda 1TB x2
  • PSU
    EVGA Supernova 1000w 
  • Display(s)
    Lenovo L29w-30 29 Inch UltraWide Full HD, BenQ - XL2430(portrait), Dell P2311Hb(portrait)
  • Cooling
    MasterLiquid Lite 240
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, williamcll said:

Bit more information: I'm pretty sure the 5500M is for laptops
image.png.4ea7a3aca21ab21fef87b73dece4cfcb.png

PCIe 4.0 is nice for laptops as that means you can run the 'card' on a 4x, or maybe even a 1x 'slot' and it will be fine, leaving more of the valuable lanes open for NVMe and networking cards. It also means more lanes are free for thunderbolt too!!!

My Folding Stats - Join the fight against COVID-19 with FOLDING! - If someone has helped you out on the forum don't forget to give them a reaction to say thank you!

 

The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. - Socrates
 

Please put as much effort into your question as you expect me to put into answering it. 

 

  • CPU
    Ryzen 9 5950X
  • Motherboard
    Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370-GAMING 5
  • RAM
    32GB DDR4 3200
  • GPU
    Inno3D 4070 Ti
  • Case
    Cooler Master - MasterCase H500P
  • Storage
    Western Digital Black 250GB, Seagate BarraCuda 1TB x2
  • PSU
    EVGA Supernova 1000w 
  • Display(s)
    Lenovo L29w-30 29 Inch UltraWide Full HD, BenQ - XL2430(portrait), Dell P2311Hb(portrait)
  • Cooling
    MasterLiquid Lite 240
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1650 was released a year ago not that long ago, Of course a new GPU with more processing power and better ram can beat it,  It will be incredibly shameful if it doesn't.

 

Next in the headlines for the TN sub,  AMD's new ryzen 3 3300 shits all over Intels i3 8100    oops, not really relevant to topic

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mr moose said:

The 1650 was released a year ago, Of course a new GPU with more processing power and better ram can beat it,  It will be incredibly shameful if it doesn't.

 

Next in the headlines for the TN sub,  AMD's new ryzen 3 3300 shits all over Intels i3 8100...  

Only the 20xx series cards were released last year. nVidia didn't release the 16xx series until 2nd quarter 2019... and then refreshed the 20xx series with the 'super' in July to undermine the 5700 launch... as well as cutting prices by around 10%

 

 

System 1: Gigabyte Aorus B450 Pro, Ryzen 5 2600X, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3200mhz, Sapphire 5700XT, 250GB NVME WD Black, 2x Crucial MX5001TB, 2x Seagate 3TB, H115i AIO, Sharkoon BW9000 case with corsair ML fans, EVGA G2 Gold 650W Modular PSU, liteon bluray/dvd/rw.. NO RGB aside from MB and AIO pump. Triple 27" Monitor setup (1x 144hz, 2x 75hz, all freesync/freesync 2)

System 2: Asus M5 MB, AMD FX8350, 16GB DDR3, Sapphire RX580, 30TB of storage, 250GB SSD, Silverstone HTPC chassis, Corsair 550W Modular PSU, Noctua cooler, liteon bluray/dvd/rw, 4K HDR display (Samsung TV)

System 3 & 4: nVidia shield TV (2017 & 2019) Pro with extra 128GB samsung flash drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anomnomnomaly said:

Only the 20xx series cards were released last year. nVidia didn't release the 16xx series until 2nd quarter 2019... and then refreshed the 20xx series with the 'super' in July to undermine the 5700 launch... as well as cutting prices by around 10%

 

 

My mistake, I take it back. thank you for correcting me.

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this card is 150 dollars then it's a fantastic buy.

If it's ~200 dollars then it will be kind of a meh launch with roughly the same price:performance as what Nvidia offers.

 

Let's hope it's 150 dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GOTSpectrum said:

PCIe 4.0 is nice for laptops as that means you can run the 'card' on a 4x, or maybe even a 1x 'slot' and it will be fine, leaving more of the valuable lanes open for NVMe and networking cards. It also means more lanes are free for thunderbolt too!!!

Yeah but Thunderbolt has yet to support PCIe4 yet

Specs: Motherboard: Asus X470-PLUS TUF gaming (Yes I know it's poor but I wasn't informed) RAM: Corsair VENGEANCE® LPX DDR4 3200Mhz CL16-18-18-36 2x8GB

            CPU: Ryzen 9 5900X          Case: Antec P8     PSU: Corsair RM850x                        Cooler: Antec K240 with two Noctura Industrial PPC 3000 PWM

            Drives: Samsung 970 EVO plus 250GB, Micron 1100 2TB, Seagate ST4000DM000/1F2168 GPU: EVGA RTX 2080 ti Black edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2019 at 11:34 AM, GOTSpectrum said:

I just want OpenCL to work on Navi! Urgh 

I just want a low profile and no power connector. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe some OEMs will have it first because limited 7nm supply so they rather want production on Ryzen? 

“Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Try to make sense of what you see and wonder about what makes the universe exist. Be curious. And however difficult life may seem, there is always something you can do and succeed at. 
It matters that you don't just give up.”

-Stephen Hawking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excited to see the 5500M go inside the new MacBook Pros

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really think they should have made the lower end cards on 12nm, yeah power consumption would be higher, but they could sell them for pocket change and just crash the market.

 

Maybe make an OEM card on 7nm with no power connector and a consumer card that needs it but is a fair amount cheaper.

 

But... We all know AMD wouldn't do such a thing 

My Folding Stats - Join the fight against COVID-19 with FOLDING! - If someone has helped you out on the forum don't forget to give them a reaction to say thank you!

 

The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. - Socrates
 

Please put as much effort into your question as you expect me to put into answering it. 

 

  • CPU
    Ryzen 9 5950X
  • Motherboard
    Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370-GAMING 5
  • RAM
    32GB DDR4 3200
  • GPU
    Inno3D 4070 Ti
  • Case
    Cooler Master - MasterCase H500P
  • Storage
    Western Digital Black 250GB, Seagate BarraCuda 1TB x2
  • PSU
    EVGA Supernova 1000w 
  • Display(s)
    Lenovo L29w-30 29 Inch UltraWide Full HD, BenQ - XL2430(portrait), Dell P2311Hb(portrait)
  • Cooling
    MasterLiquid Lite 240
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, leadeater said:

@GOTSpectrum Do we know the pricing yet?

Not that I know of, i'm expecting it to undercut the vnidia part by 10% or so myself.

My Folding Stats - Join the fight against COVID-19 with FOLDING! - If someone has helped you out on the forum don't forget to give them a reaction to say thank you!

 

The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. - Socrates
 

Please put as much effort into your question as you expect me to put into answering it. 

 

  • CPU
    Ryzen 9 5950X
  • Motherboard
    Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370-GAMING 5
  • RAM
    32GB DDR4 3200
  • GPU
    Inno3D 4070 Ti
  • Case
    Cooler Master - MasterCase H500P
  • Storage
    Western Digital Black 250GB, Seagate BarraCuda 1TB x2
  • PSU
    EVGA Supernova 1000w 
  • Display(s)
    Lenovo L29w-30 29 Inch UltraWide Full HD, BenQ - XL2430(portrait), Dell P2311Hb(portrait)
  • Cooling
    MasterLiquid Lite 240
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Currently using a Sapphire Pulse RX 570 4gb, is this worth upgrading for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just thought I'd update this. Early gaming benchmarks are out for the 5500M..

 

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Comeback-AMD-reaches-NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-Max-Q-levels-of-performance-with-the-Radeon-RX-5500M.440495.0.html

 

It is close to the 1660ti Max-Q. That is very promising. These are pre-production results, so they could improve.

 

image.png.243588ebe3e83adbb0e19d508876d484.png

Just one result of many on the site, for those who can't be bothered to look.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×