Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
infinitytec

UserBenchmark Adjusts Algorthym to Favor Single-Thread Performance, Causing Strange Results

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, thorhammerz said:

While streaming that game while editing that video of you streaming that game while running the latest-and-greatest MC benchmark....

 

😜

That's not the 80% of consumer demand though.

 

EDIT: I'm not having a good day,. leave me alone 🙃


QuicK and DirtY. Read the CoC it's like a guide on how not to be moron.  Also I don't have an issue with the VS series.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know the processor and how it stands then there is no reason to google it, or look at userbenchmark. I've been running my older stuff on Userbenchmark. There's nothing about it that says Intel is better than ryzen in any way. The group leaders tend to have some really cool hardware. That happens to be ryzen.  Userbenchmark still hates my phenom II x4 955, 8gb samsung ram, hp quadro 2000 1gb digital audio workstation just like you. Nothing about core 2 quad is confused to be better than ryzen. I7 isn't confused either.  Cinebench rendering a lame photo isn't exactly proving anything. If you know so much about the hardware, then why does anyone benchmark at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/11/2019 at 8:52 AM, Animal901 said:

That old game again.....that game was made way before quad core. I think dual core just came out. New vegas ran naturally on dual. So nervernind what you said.  

 

 

 

 

On another note.  This forum has a big problem with running cinebench 24/7. It's not always about that multicore. People are still using phenom ii, bulldozer and core 2 quad machines.  Ryzen hasn't been the killer everyone expected.  I still remember the pain of owning an amd athlon xp 2400+ with the fancy radeon 9800pro. They consistently relesed bad drivers that crashed on battlefield 1942. everyone forgets how often you would have to reinstall xp back then. Thanks amd/ati.

core 2 duo over here. this would increase that score significantly!


into trains? here's the model railroad thread!

The way to get the specs for my PC. go to the store. Buy some potatos. boil them and mash the. and stuff that in a focus g with a ssd.

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, will4623 said:

core 2 duo over here. this would increase that score significantly!

I've rebuilt a few core 2 duo 3ghz or more 6mb cache sff lenovos for people.  Those lenovos tend to be a good chipset. It's unrealistic how fast they can move with an ssd upgrade. The gpu is usually limited though. Pcie being older of course. Ive got a 3.33ghz c2d wolfdale, dell board, 8gb adata ram that would make a  damn fine computer for forum browsing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Animal901 said:

I've rebuilt a few core 2 duo 3ghz or more 6mb cache sff lenovos for people.  Those lenovos tend to be a good chipset. It's unrealistic how fast they can move with an ssd upgrade. The gpu is usually limited though. Pcie being older of course. Ive got a 3.33ghz c2d wolfdale, dell board, 8gb adata ram that would make a  damn fine computer for forum browsing. 

I have a few. the best is a e8400


into trains? here's the model railroad thread!

The way to get the specs for my PC. go to the store. Buy some potatos. boil them and mash the. and stuff that in a focus g with a ssd.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Animal901 said:

Better than an e8600?


best I have.

 


into trains? here's the model railroad thread!

The way to get the specs for my PC. go to the store. Buy some potatos. boil them and mash the. and stuff that in a focus g with a ssd.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×