Intel Comet Lake-S Platform Overview / Desktop Platform Consumer Roadmap (Updated)

[S w a t s o n]

computerbase.de and some people on twitter are reposting this slide too. Even if the slide is doctored there is some reason to believe some of the information is correct

[sazrocks]

36 minutes ago, S w a t s o n said:

computerbase.de and some people on twitter are reposting this slide too. Even if the slide is doctored there is some reason to believe some of the information is correct

Computerbase.de's source is this tweet:

Said twitter user later admitted it to getting it from a random person on 5ch:

 

So unless we decide to give anons on 5ch literally any credibility this should be considered fake.

[S w a t s o n]

Just now, sazrocks said:

Computerbase.de's source is this tweet:

Said twitter user later admitted it to getting it from a random person on 5ch:

 

So unless we decide to give anons on 5ch literally any credibility this should be considered fake.

The fact of the matter is the information that is likely true on this was already known from previous leaks or information.

[BiG StroOnZ]

6 minutes ago, S w a t s o n said:

The fact of the matter is the information that is likely true on this was already known from previous leaks or information.

 

Yeah the above thread from back in March was an early preview, basically into what we are seeing today (at least further confirming the 10c20t part). 

[Maticks]

Really want to see 6Ghz or just go home Intel, AMD is doing the more cores thing.

Intel did the high clock thing. they've really hit the 5Ghz ceiling and just stopped..

[RejZoR]

Naming scheme is absolutely terrible.

[PianoPlayer88Key]

4 hours ago, Queen Chrysallis said:

Where's the KFC model? I want my CPU + Chicken Bundle Intel!

What about the model that has suffixes with...

• No integrated graphics (found on the 9th-gen LGA 1151 series)

• 15W TDP (on a lot of mobile / laptop chips with that TDP)

• Level 4 DRAM Cache (Broadwell desktop LGA 1150 CPUs had this)

• Unlocked multiplier (but not "extreme edition")

(Maybe the first 2 would suffice as well.)

 

 

[thorhammerz]

10-core 5.2 GHz all-core at how many watts off the wall?

[Loote]

This would be nice.

[Quadriplegic]

Didn't ClickdoredTV teach you anything?

[Dabombinable]

If they are going to be monolithic still...I think AMD might actually end up having higher profit margins than Intel. Despite their current pricing.

[Bananasplit_00]

The article can't even read their own graphics lmfao. This all sounds like absolut bullshit anyway

[Maticks]

1 hour ago, thorhammerz said:

10-core 5.2 GHz all-core at how many watts off the wall?

Remember that Intel only rate TDP on Base not boost. its going to be a space heater. lol

[williamcll]

Remember when they said the new ryzen will clock at 5Ghz?

[MeatFeastMan]

Intel pricing things cheaply? Surely not, couldn't be! I'm not having it. And they can put 105w all they want...it doesn't matter what they say, that 10c at 5.2ghz is going to consume more power than my fx 9590 does.

 

Surely every chip must be able to be air cooled. How can a 5.2ghz 14nm 10c part be air cooled? I imagine even the mighty Noctua NH D15 has got a task on it's hands cooling that thing.

 

Also, why would you have so many different versions of the same chip? There's 3 10 core cpu's there. And one of them only has a 2.7ghz base..this all seems a bit fishy to me. And..why not just release a 10 core based on Coffee Lake refresh, decrease the price of the 9900k and put the 10c on par on price with the 3900x. Surely that makes so much more sense than this. We're basically getting 3% better IPC as usual with a 10c slapped on.

 

2.7ghz base, 5.2ghz boost..very suspicious..

 

I welcome the prices if true though. The 6 core looks tasty (Although the power consumption doesn't)

 

 

[RejZoR]

Why people keep saying things like "3%" IPC boost on Intel for every release. There never was any IPC boost for like last 4 generations. They were just raising the clocks. That's not IPC improvement at all. IPC boost is when clocks don't change, but performance does.

[Taf the Ghost]

3 hours ago, thorhammerz said:

10-core 5.2 GHz all-core at how many watts off the wall?

400w Desktop CPUs are all the rage.

[Taf the Ghost]

32 minutes ago, RejZoR said:

Why people keep saying things like "3%" IPC boost on Intel for every release. There never was any IPC boost for like last 4 generations. They were just raising the clocks. That's not IPC improvement at all. IPC boost is when clocks don't change, but performance does.

Intel was able to find some Cache improvements from each iteration of Skylake, but it's only ever effected a small number of tasks. More responsive boosting has been the way they've gotten most of their improvements between Skylake iterations.

 

As for the leak, we know a 10c is coming, but that list looks wrong. Intel would have to throw away too many chips if they ran out that many non-HT parts.

[TheNaitsyrk]

I have 9900K at the moment. I'm definitely holding back. If Intel will release a meh CPU then 3950X is gonna be my choice. Got AMD copper block (brand new) ready sitting in a box.

[Firewrath9]

10 hours ago, sazrocks said:

But why when literally everything from the last half decade exists?

still beats our any "modern" CPU under 40$

[CarlBar]

10 hours ago, alex75871 said:

That slide is more fake than my ex girlfriend.

 

Is that because you've never had a girlfriend or because she's not ex yet though.

 

Sorry couldn't resist.

 

Anyway back to trying to hide from the pollen, i feel so crap right now.

[rcmaehl]

11 hours ago, bleedblue said:

14nm++++x10¹² when?

They'll probably pull a page out of C's book and call it 14nm#

[CTR640]

Weren't HT more vulnerable? It caught my interests there is zero Intel CPU with only physical cores.

[exetras]

This was leaked a while back. (Both are mobile processors)

 

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13535829

 

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13535623

[RejZoR]

That's about as fast as Ryzen 5 2500U... And I still can't get over how stupid naming scheme has become for Intel. It's an absolute mess compared to clean SKU's by AMD. Intel should really change the naming scheme at this point. Almost every company always has when they reached 10 iterations within same series unless the name is simple to begin with (two digit model name).