Jump to content

cracking TOR

TheBean
Go to solution Solved by Alex Atkin UK,
On 4/7/2019 at 7:35 PM, WereCatf said:

I do not think there is any technical reason for why they couldn't do that, they just aren't doing it now/yet.

Well for one thing Tor can be dog slow as it is due to how the routing works, adding dummy traffic to the mix it would be like dialup.

I just watched a video on the computerphile channel about Tor routing. they mentioned that a weakpoint is that you can figure out what a person is doing based on the scheduling of the packets. my question is that why cant the client send fake packets through the network so that there is a constant stream of packets. that would make it impossible to figure out where you connect and what you do there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saksham said:

my question is that why cant the client send fake packets through the network so that there is a constant stream of packets.

I do not think there is any technical reason for why they couldn't do that, they just aren't doing it now/yet.

Hand, n. A singular instrument worn at the end of the human arm and commonly thrust into somebody’s pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/7/2019 at 7:35 PM, WereCatf said:

I do not think there is any technical reason for why they couldn't do that, they just aren't doing it now/yet.

Well for one thing Tor can be dog slow as it is due to how the routing works, adding dummy traffic to the mix it would be like dialup.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alex Atkin UK said:

Well for one thing Tor can be dog slow as it is due to how the routing works, adding dummy traffic to the mix it would be like dialup.

Yes, but that's a practical reason, not a technical one.

Hand, n. A singular instrument worn at the end of the human arm and commonly thrust into somebody’s pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, WereCatf said:

Yes, but that's a practical reason, not a technical one.

The really important details usually are practical limitations rather than technical.

There's no technical reason we can't all have Gigabit fibre and insanely fast PCs.  Its always the practical details that get in the way.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alex Atkin UK said:

The really important details usually are practical limitations rather than technical.

There's no technical reason we can't all have Gigabit fibre and insanely fast PCs.  Its always the practical details that get in the way.

Um, yes, I know. I'm not sure what your point is; I do know the difference between technical and practical.

Hand, n. A singular instrument worn at the end of the human arm and commonly thrust into somebody’s pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

TOR is already slow, adding more traffic like @Alex Atkin UKsaid would make it slow, and TOR inherently isn't fully safe.

 

Use a VPN.. sheesh.


If my answer got you to your solution make sure to 'Mark Resolved!
( / . _ . / )

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WereCatf said:

Um, yes, I know. I'm not sure what your point is; I do know the difference between technical and practical.

My point was that in a case like this you could argue that the practical limitation is also a technical one, because its how the technology works that makes it impractical.

Its almost always about writing a technical solution to get around a practical limitation.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 4/10/2019 at 7:03 AM, GabeThePCHelper said:

TOR is already slow, adding more traffic like @Alex Atkin UKsaid would make it slow, and TOR inherently isn't fully safe.

 

Use a VPN.. sheesh.

both would be better 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×