Jump to content

Intel 9400F hits Amazon

At $208 it doesn't make any sense to me unless it performs better than a 9400 w/igp. If I had to pick an i5 9000 series CPU I would just spend another $56 and get a 9600K, though none of them are that attractive to me without hyper threading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BobbyPdue said:

At $208 it doesn't make any sense to me unless it performs better than a 9400 w/igp. If I had to pick an i5 9000 series CPU I would just spend another $56 and get a 9600K, though none of them are that attractive to me without hyper threading.

I don't think i5s have ever had hyperthreading so if anything the mid tier Intel CPU range is of no interest to you. 

 

I do agree though that if Intel releases non-IGP CPUs of the same processors and the performance is roughly the same then it's just a further piece of evidence in the ever growing pile of examples of Intel milking more money from their consumers with no gain for the consumers.

Ryzen build -  CPU: Ryzen 7 3700X Cooler: Corsair H115i Platinum RGB | GPU: RTX 2070 FE | RAM: 2x8GB Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR4-3200MHz | PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA P2 750W | Motherboard: MSI X570 MEG Ace | Storage: Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB - Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200 RPM | Case: Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic

 

Intel build - CPU: i5-9600k @ 4.9 GHz - 1.28v Cooler: NZXT Kraken X62 rev 2 | GPU: GTX 980 Ti FE | RAM: 2x8GB Corsair Vengeace LPX DDR4-3200MHz | PSU: Corsair RM650x  | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra | Storage: Crucial MX500 500GB - Western Digital Blue 1TB 5400RPM | Case: NZXT H700 Black

 

Laptop - HP Pavillion; CPU: Core i5-7200U RAM: 8GB DDR4-2133MHz | GPU: Intel HD 620 | Storage: Samsung 128GB SSD - Western Digital 1TB HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Intel is only doing this because of the 14nm shortage, they had to find a way to get those CPUs with defective iGPU out somehow, the price cut is nowhere near enough to justify going for one of these.

 

Specially now when so many applications can finally utilize the iGPU through QuickSync for hardware acceleration.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, xandredu said:

Intel milking more money from their consumers with no gain for the consumers

I don't agree with this sentiment.  I don't think adding another CPU to their portfolio hurts anyone and no one's being forced to buy it.  If it didn't exist intel wouldn't have a 9th Gen CPU at the $200 price point.  That being said there is no stock on Amazon it either sold out or hasn't been in stock yet.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BobbyPdue said:

I don't agree with this sentiment.  I don't think adding another CPU to their portfolio hurts anyone and no one's being forced to buy it.  If it didn't exist intel wouldn't have a 9th Gen CPU at the $200 price point.  That being said there is no stock on Amazon it either sold out or hasn't been in stock yet.   

 

 

So products like 9th vs. 8th gen i5 where they're essentially the same chip clocked higher is not milking money from the consumers? They're basically reselling old tech and passing it off as new tech at a higher price and anyone who's not following the CPU scene won't know the difference and it's normal for consumers to go for the latest stuff to be "safe" when investing in anything. That's what I don't agree with and I want to make it clear that I don't think Intel is the only one who does this I'm just stating Intel because this thread is about Intel.

Ryzen build -  CPU: Ryzen 7 3700X Cooler: Corsair H115i Platinum RGB | GPU: RTX 2070 FE | RAM: 2x8GB Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR4-3200MHz | PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA P2 750W | Motherboard: MSI X570 MEG Ace | Storage: Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB - Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200 RPM | Case: Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic

 

Intel build - CPU: i5-9600k @ 4.9 GHz - 1.28v Cooler: NZXT Kraken X62 rev 2 | GPU: GTX 980 Ti FE | RAM: 2x8GB Corsair Vengeace LPX DDR4-3200MHz | PSU: Corsair RM650x  | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra | Storage: Crucial MX500 500GB - Western Digital Blue 1TB 5400RPM | Case: NZXT H700 Black

 

Laptop - HP Pavillion; CPU: Core i5-7200U RAM: 8GB DDR4-2133MHz | GPU: Intel HD 620 | Storage: Samsung 128GB SSD - Western Digital 1TB HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×