Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'userbenchmark'.
-
So I am currently thinking of ditching my stationary system (AMD FX-8350) in exchange for a laptop (Intel Core I7-12650H), since the biggie is basically living it's last months, yet I've seemingly stumbled into a bit of a pickle. According to cpubenchmark.net, AMD FX-8350 has GHz of 4.0 on start, and Intel Core I7-12650H has a 2.3 GHz start, which at first made me think that the processor is low end, yet according to single-core stats, the I7 has a core rating almost twice as much processing power. I decided to use the userbenchmark (I know, bad source) in hopes that it'd contain even slightly untainted data (FX-8350's existed since 2011 I believe, so maybe the administration didn't bother to change the stats for it?), with it showing the same results. As such, I have 3 conclusions: 1. The processor is downright awful but somehow passes benchmarks (unlikely) 2. Benchmarks contain improper data (maybe) 3. I am going insane and don't actually know how the GHz's work in terms of CPU processing power. So, could anyone help me figure this one out, if it even makes sense, and did I choose an actual upgrade and not just a brick? Cheers? P.S: According to some reviews, I7-12650H is junk, but I avoid relying on that data. -
I know Userbenchmark is a horrible site... but I do use it to quickly check 2 parts and see which one is better. -
So... What is up with the userbenchmark results for the new Intel CPU's? They might be fast, but not this ground breakingly fast.
-
This is the first desktop PC I've ever built, I discovered I could benchmark it and here are the results. Ryzen 7 5700G: performing way below expectations, 23rd percentile Samsung 980 Pro: performing below expectations, 25th percentile Kingston HyperX Fury something, 3200MHz 2x16GBs: performing way below expectation, 25th percentile. Consider that my motherboard is a MSI MPG X570 Gaming Plus, a 1000W PSU, windows 10 and the latest BIOS version for my motherboard. That doesn't seem ok, what do you think? Should I take it to the computer doctor? I got all the drivers working and all Should I even be worried? How can I boost these things up? Thank you and I appreciate your response. Vitor
-
Hi, I'm test my Ram latency and Userbenchmark showed 60ms latency but Aida64 showed 71ms latency, which one is more accurate? 5600X 4X8GB DDR4 3466mhz 16-18-18-18-34 thanks
-
I have a fairly new 1660 TI windforce I bought around a month ago and I realized that when I manually set the fan speed to 100% via MSI afterburner it made like a cranking noise. Here is a link to the noise it makes. Recorded from an ipad fairly close to it. Userbenchmark says missing GPU when I ran a test on it; but I'm fairly certain I used DDU to clear drivers and install new ones before and it worked when I initially installed. I'm not sure if this is an issue I should be worried about. -
Hi everyone. I'm building my first pc, and I've come across a used 2070 Super (Gigabyte Gaming OC 3X 8g) for 370 euros. The lowest new 3060 i can find in France is the MSI Ventus 2x for 430 euros (for reference). I've used gpu.userbenchmark.com to compare the 2070 Super and the 3060 and it said that the 2070S had better scores. Is this site trustworthy? Does the small advantage in this benchmark translate well to games?
-
Hello all, after doing a fresh Win 11 Install, I'm currently trying to run a Userbenchmark test, however, I'm repeatedly getting a strange error; there's no number/error code present when testing my C drive, it just says sequential tests were aborted. My drive has plenty of space, I don't have compression enabled; I'm at a lost right now... any suggestions?
-
If anyone uses the "UserBenchmarks": http://www.userbenchmark.com/ How does this look for my new editing workstation? Is there a better benchmark that others prefer? More relevant to handling video post production? UserBenchmarks: Game 143%, Desk 135%, Work 115% CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K - 117.5% GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 - 177% SSD: Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 190.2% SSD: Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB - 187.8% HDD: Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB - 103.8% RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB - 109.4% MBD: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO I don't really need all this performance today, but while I'm at it I like to buy some obsolescence protection. -
Long story short: upgraded my PC from i5-550 to: - i5-7600K with massive Noctua cooler (NH-D15) - ASUS Prime Z-270A Motherboard - DDR4-3000 Corsair RAM ... but decided to keep my old case and power supply. Old power supply was some 750W model by Delta Electronics, 7-10 years old. Due to my student budget, I decided to upgrade my used GTX770 to a used (MSI) GTX 780Ti. Everything went fine for a few days, lots of gaming with maximum temps always under 80°C - also did some benchmarking and stress tests, no problems. Then I played Doom for ~1h and started Far Cry 3 after that. Right in the game menu the PC suddenly shut off (no bluescreen, sounded like just the PSU switched itself off). I restarted the PC, started UserBenchmark to see what happens. Everything went fine until the last GPU benchmark (glowing particles) - the program rendered ~1 frame and then the PSU went off again. Tried again to make sure it was a permanent error. After a while of googling I decided to get a new PSU - now I have a Corsair RM750X and this error does not occur anymore - so far, so good. Even before getting a new PSU, I noticed a slight performance drop. Had to change settings in Witcher 3 in order to maintain 60fps. Doom didn't seem to be so smooth anymore either. My UserBenchmark GPU score also went down - my 780Ti belongs to the lowest performing 6% out there. Beforehand my GPU was in the 53rd percentile - way better than now. Is it possible that the old PSU damaged the GPU? Or some other components? Tried benchmarking with my GTX770, which seemed just fine (94th percentile at Userbenchmark) Old Benchmark: http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3392439 New Benchmark: http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3458649 I found out: - No way it's thermal throttling - max. temps CPU/GPU 60-65°C - the new PSU has enough power - It doesn't seem to be a driver issue (did clean uninstall and reinstalled several newer/older drivers) - Because I made the Win10 Creators upgrade the same day as my old PSU started acting weird, I reverted to an older Win10 version - no results. - BIOS update didn't change anything At the moment I am running Heaven Benchmark several times while trying to OC slightly with Afterburner. Even with the slightly overclocked card, my Scores go down with every new benchmark. 1345 -> 1328 -> 1137 -> 1106 (Dx11, 1080p 8xAA fullscreen, Q.: Ultra, Tess.: Extreme). GPU temperature still 62°C. Could the card be in some kind of low performance mode? GPU-Z tells me that the GPU Core clock is around 900-950MHz, Memory Clock 1750MHz, 0,987V. Power limit is at 105% and Temp limit at 95°C, so a higher clock wouldn't be a problem. I noticed that when I start a benchmark the clock speed goes to 1100 MHz for a short time, then goes back down to 900-something. Set the benchmark to maximum performance in the nvidia program, windows is also not in some kind of power saving mode. even at 45°C the card clocks down to 900MHz speeds. PerfCap Reason from GPU-Z says Power limit, though Power sensor says ~65% usage. Has anyone faced problems like this before or has an idea what I can try?
-
title says it all , put em here in link form, maybe a few notes of what you overclocked & how hard if you did i was unable to find a similar topic and the steam vr thread goes in the same category so yea , if i did a boo-boo mods let me know My main rig http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/1505937 cpu is at 4.6ghz @ 1.46v, gpu at 1250mhz core and stock ram my second rig http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/1950212 Gpu is at 950mhz @ 1.1v
-
I did the User Benchmark test to see how my system was running and I got these results. UserBenchmarks: Game 37%, Desk 58%, Work 40% CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 65.9% GPU: Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti - 34.7% SSD: Drevo X1 SSD 60GB - 39.6% HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) - 100.2% RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2x4GB - 38.4% MBD: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF My graphics card has 34% below average and this is worrying. Is there any way that I can make it run as it was supposed to. Also, do you think that I should upgrade my RAM and SSD. Thanks
-
I have an EVGA 1080 TI FTW3 and I got these scores when I benchmarked it on UserBenchmark.com. (11th-19th percentile on stock frequency) UserBenchmarks: Game 120%, Desk 79%, Work 93% GPU|Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti|159.6% In this I believe it was at the 35th percentile (this was overclocked to around 2035 MHZ). I am curious if I should get this card replaced with a new one as I just got it and it already has a burnt out led and these benchmarks are a little concerning to me. I am new to this stuff so please point me in the right direction. Thanks!
-
Welp I saw a few charts out there ranking RX 570 just above GTX 970 including Versus.com but on UserBenchmark it shows GTX 970 have higher effective speed... Now what's in my sights are a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming (OC) vs a Sapphire RX 570 (4GB or 8 GB version), RX570 8GB version is about 15 USD cheaper and 4GB 25 USD cheaper comparing to the GTX970 OC. (And appears 8GB ones have higher clock rate?) Which one should I go with?
-
Might I suggest allowing Builds.gg, UserBenchmark scores, and other various benchmark leaderboard scores in the signatures? https://builds.gg/ Builds.gg is one of the best ways, in my opinion, to display a rig. It allows photos, detailed part descriptions, and regular updates to be shown. People can also easily show approval by a simple thumbs up or by leaving a comment. Linus Media Group has been sponsored by them in the past, so it's not like it would be too far off from being allowed easily. They even have their Copper Tubing Build as an entry! https://www.userbenchmark.com/ UserBenchmark links would be useful to show brag-worthy overclocking scores right off the bat. It's also another way to provide a parts list, but it's actually verifiable in contrast to PC Part Picker, which anyone can make any list of whatever components are out there without any proof of actually having them in their possesion. I believe Linus Media Group has used this site as an information source in their videos as well. https://www.3dmark.com/hall-of-fame-2/ Having Timespy or other benchmarking leaderboards would be neat. I understand deciding on which specific sites to be allowed could get complex, so I'm not even sure this would ever become a possibility. It's more of another idea to throw out there while I'm at it.
-
Hi! Just finished building and setting up my music production and general game dev - rig. I ran a userbenchmark test and got the following score. Is this score good for my hardware? I have everything at stock speeds (no OC, UV etc). UserBenchmarks: Game 131%, Desk 165%, Work 154% CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K - 123.4% GPU: AMD RX Vega 64 - 132.5% SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 358.3% RAM: Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB - 105.4% MBD: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER Thanks! -
Hi All, So I have been wanting to upgrade my PC a little bit for a while but I wasn't sure what exactly to upgrade. Tonight, I used userbenchmark to benchmark my PC and I was wondering if using these results if anyone could give me any suggestions on what exactly to upgrade? I have attached a screenshot of my benchmark results. CPU: i5-7500 GPU: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB RAM: 16GB Hyper X 2400mhz HDD: 1TB WD Blue PSU: Corsiar CX 550W Motherboard: Gigabyte B250M DS3H I don't have an SSD.
-
SSD "Performing below expectations" - UserBenchmark
PremierSupreme posted a topic in Storage Devices
Hi. I just ran my PC through UserBenchmark - Here are my results As you can see, it says my SSD is "Performing below expectations" Any ideas on what's going on?
-
First time asking a question on a forum, please be gentle... So I bought a zotac 1070 mini secondhand, because it was a good deal. After installing the card and updating the drivers, I optimized nvidia control panel and windows for performance and ran a few benchmarks. I ran the userbenchmark for a quick and easy overview of the card, seeing the 25th percentile and 'good' 72% listed...im confused. Shouldn't the card be scoring atleast slightly better than my other components? Is 25th percentile something I should be concerned about? My hdd and ram will be upgraded so ignore those results for now, my concern is the gpu...unless they affect the gpu score. Pictures are provided Tnx
-
So I'm relatively new to the pc scene getting a pre built system around Christmas of 2018. I just made my first upgrade to it in the form of the Gigabyte 5700 XT OC. After installing the drivers, uninstalling and reinstalling the drivers, overclocking my cpu (Ryzen 5 1600) to 3.8 Ghz to check for bottle necking, my card is performing in the 0th to 1st percentile consistently on Userbenchmark and I'm not seeing any significant performance improvements from the RX 580 that I had. Is this a driver issue that i just need an update for? or did I just get super unlucky? Any suggestions? https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/20126168 this is my benchmark for reference.
-
I just ran this UserBenchmark and my background CPU is 90%. Looking at Task Manager I see "AMD User Experience Program Master" near the top of CPU usage. I also found these AMD services (see picture). I am right in thinking this is good culprit for my high background CPU score? Thanks in advance
-
Why am i getting "incomplete Gaming/Desktop/Workstation" Benchmarks and a "tree-trunk rating" in Online Userbenchmark Test Comparisons yet my CPU,GPU and RAM are all claimed to be performing as outstanding? However - my Optane accelerated HDD states "relative performance n/a - insufficient samples" - Does this mean that any optane acclerated system can't be properly benchmarked and compared even if it were working properly? UserBenchmarks: CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K - 101.2% GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti - 155.2% SSD: Intel Optane+2.7TBHDD - 195% RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB - 90.2% MBD: Asrock Z370 Gaming-ITX/ac
-
So Im starting the new year off right and finally getting around to benchmarking my overclocks but Ive encountered userbenchmark being what I think is odd This run I raised the base clock by 0.50 https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/13425131 But somehow it scored lower than this run https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/13425069 Why is this? The single core went up in the better run as Id expect but overall it says it got worse Edit: Intrestingly after increasing my ring ratio from 48 to 49 it goes back to 100% again.. Whats going on Im not getting?
-
Here's my full bechmark: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/11623067 I'm not sure why my EVGA GTX 1050 TI SC score is so low. The only thing I can think of is that there may be some sort of driver conflict (see Device Manager). What do we think?
-
Latest benchmark As the title says, UBM says my xmp profile isn't enabled but I confirmed i have it enabled in the BIOS memory CPU-Z cpu CPU-Z I also just recently OC my cpu from 3.2 to 4.0 with Intel Extreme Tuning Utility. Confirmed with benchmarks and 1hr stress tests to ensure that It is stable. Whenever I restart and go back into the bios though it would revert any changes made with IETU and boot with defaults until I loaded the program. I also went into the bios and double checked that xmp 2.0 was enabled in its own profile and made sure the set clock speeds were 3200 for the ram. I also only changed the GHz for the cpu to 4.0 and made no voltage or other clock changes but CPU-z didn't reflect the core speed when I tested it and only boosted to 3.6 GHz until I opened IETU and loaded my 4.0GHz profile. Not sure why things weren't being saved from the bios when I clicked save changes and boot option upon exit. If you guys have any suggestions or tips I'd appreciate it.
