Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'infinity'.
-
Hello, I already have this 5.1 surround kit for a couple of time. My subwoofer is from Infinity Oreus Elan, and recently i put my stereo just a tiny bit louder than normally, and than the cracking sounds begun to appear (check audio file). Then i just turned the whole set off, en came back to it next day (today). I was listening to music again, and all the problems dissapeard. So i put the stereo a little bit louder again (not so loud the speakers get blown), and it happend again. I can just wait untill tommorow, but i really want to listen to it, because it's good! I already fixed it once myself, replacing an old switch with a new one, and i really don't want to take everything apart again. So when i am not listening to music nothing is going on, when i put music on the sound comes back untill i put the music down again. Also when i put my finger on the subwoofer output for speakers (there are no speakers connected to the subwoofer, but to the sound receiver) the sound also comes back. It doesn't come out of my 5 other speakers. So i am pretty clueless and want to know if maybe one of you guys can help me! Thanks! Cracking audio.aac
-
So I just got a 2018 Subaru Outback and I'm super curious about something: Subaru has a "Premium" sound system by Harman-Kardon. I know Harm-Kardon owns Infinity, and I was wondering if anyone has had the chance to compare a Harman stock setup versus an aftermarket Infinity setup. And I'm talking about spending a good amount of money on the Infinity's. I don't cheap out on my audio!
- 4 replies
-
- automotive
- audio
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hey guys, I was listening to Excision's new 2016 Shambhala Mix on my custom living room setup (I live in a dorm so space is limited) and I noticed something with the quality of the sound... I know some of Excision's music is hard hitting on some sound systems but this seems different. The mix sounds sort of "scratchy" or distorted when playing at higher volumes. My setup is 2 Infinity Primus 150 bookshelf speakers and the subwoofer/amp is part of a Theater Logic Home Cinema L6 I found out of my neighbors garage (he kept it for 10 years without even opening the box so technically you could call it brand new). Here's the tricky part... I have NO IDEA what the specs are of the amp (no idea on impedance, wattage, etc. I've looked everywhere online for a manual) So I'm wondering if it's possible the amp has too much or too little resistance for the speakers to handle. Anyone have any ideas?
- 3 replies
-
- infinity
- theater logic
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The small developer I-Novae studios are doing a kickstarter for their space battle sim Infinity: Battlescape (used to be called Infinity:The Quest for Earth). Their game uses very detailed procedural generation with full planets, moons and gas giants in one large solar system. With totally seamless transitioning through planetary/gas giants atmosphere's. Land anywhere on a moon or planet's surface. Fly low through Cynon and valleys whilst dog fighting or escaping. Dog fight as your fly through a planetary atmosphere or cloud layers of a massive gas giant. I just like this game idea, but don't take my word for it, go discover Infinity: Battlescape for yourself: * Update - The game was fully kickstarter funded. Now you can Pledge now via the website (indiegogo) Pledge upgrade: https://inovaestudios.com/Account#products Website: https://www.inovaestudios.com/Battlescape Kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/309114309/infinity-battlescape The I-Novae Engine - Pure Digital Art Pledge now via the website (indiegogo) What they have right now is a fully working prototype (for media and streamers to access), not even pre alpha. And using a lot of prototype assets. In my opinion, So much more detail and polish will be added the dev's have said. Two years of heads down development to go. the procedurally generated planets, moons and layered atmospheres will have a lot more 'math' and algorithm work done. The cockpit will be greatly refined for the many various ships. The atmospheric entry effects (physics) of heating and types of different plasmas will be added. I gather if your ship cockpit is damaged then a heavy atmospheric entry might run the risk of a hull breach. The flight models will be quite different for space flight, atmospheric entry flight (the various types of upper atmospheres). And the types of ship, for example the ship in the prototype we see in the videos is more like a flying wing, with other ships being more suited to in-atmosphere flight than others. One can also dog fight with other ships as one enters or exits the atmosphere of a planets of moon or even a gas giant. With the deeper layers of cloud in a gas giant posing serious pressure and other harmful storm and lightning damage on the the ships. And potentially large battles in space just above planets surface, with larger ships and weapons fire could be seen from the planets surface. Again all polish and further development that another two years or so will bring to the game. It's certainly going to be a very interesting time for procedurally generated space games over the next 2-3 years, for all four games, ED, SC, No Man's Sky and Infinity:Battlescape. Although I think it's a bit too early at this point to say one way or another what Star Citizen will deliver with regards to PG. Elite with New Horizons and then onto season 3 with atmospheres looks to be very good indeed. Each game with there own unique take on PG (Procedural generation). Scott Manley has made a video reviewing the Infinity:Battlescape prototype. He demonstrates the totally seamless way one can transition a planets atmosphere. It is a very interesting time right now for seamless space to planet transitioning. Certainly the next few years with ED's season 3 will be a good thing to look forward to. And I think it's a little too early to say one way or another as regards to Star Citizen, and we know almost nothing about their PG plans. I-Novae Studios: the engine was in development many years ago. But only by one person in his spare time as a hobby project. We only started as a company in 2010, and got to this point without funding. We're absolutely committed to this game and everybody seems to love the prototype so far. There is already gravity based orbital mechanics in place. That being said, every ship has enough thrust to make orbital mechanics completely unnecessary, although you could still use such methods to manoeuvre if you wanted. Entering the gas giant. There a currently two layers of gas. One is moving very fast (a little noticeable from afar) the other one very slowly (almost noticeable from afar). The closer you get the faster they are, this gas giant is really huge. Inside the deeper layer. There are already particle effects in place. Hutchings - Developer/Artist - 30km station, hovering above a new WIP planet. Keep in mind, the asset was produced primarily for the campaign trailer, and is not an indication of final quality, but rather should be taken as an example of what's possible with the tech we've built. Additionally, it is situated just above the rings, with the central tower crossing through the rings below. A sort of transfer station for extracted or refined goods. (images by INovaeAndre- Developer/Artist) Today on Rethe prime, lovely clear skies and brisk 350kph winds. I-Novae: Hutchings - Developer/Artist As some of you may have already guessed this, but we're still adding content to the Prototype. Many will recognize the station from the 2010 tech demo video. Now an abandoned Astralis outpost in a SFC controlled system... it lay quietly in a low orbit around the Gas Giant, just outside the massive planet's atmosphere. 4 Corvette class ships "Hellions" investigate. Big! space is really big in this game. One solar system @1:1 takes some time to get around. You may get a good ballpark from the apparent respect of real planet sizes. So the gas giant is probably something like Jupiter @1:1 scale, or smaller. Dwarf gas giants are at most "just" 4 Earth radius, and the upper bound for gas giants is basically Jupiter size (gravity quickly limits larger volume). I reckon it's a safe bet that the current pink gas giant is somewhere in the range of our own gas giants @1:1. Somewhere between Jupiter and Neptune/Uranus. Considering how INovae Flavien (Game dev) said they were keen to add as many phenomena and variety as feasible: "There's going to be a lot of variety in environments on planets even in the base goal." "Wind is already in, but tornadoes, volcanoes that eject rocks, lightning in gas giants ( that could randomly hit your ship ), or even better: a periodic stellar flare that would damage any ship not in the night side of the planets closest to the star. Those are a few ideas that we're playing with. But yeah, as you can see there's potential." "I've seen many people play for 20-30 hours in the prototype so far, simply flying around and exploring. Doing nothing at all." "And that's with 2 planets ( err, moons ). The final solar system will have dozens." There will be additional effects for both warp speed and for atmospheric entry, and it IS dangerous to be going warp speeds in the atmosphere for too long, though it seems also as if auto-assist will automatically turn off your warp drive before you take damage from the atmosphere. And the dev's have some ideas for gas giants such as putting 'Bespin style' floating factories in the cloud layers of gas giants. transition down and up from these places. With Gravity and pressure effecting the ships. The effects we expect to see and experience after two more years of development. "We'd like to spend a lot more time making gas giants awesome" -game devs. As far as I know your be able to fly down through the various cloud layers to floating factories and outposts floating between the layers of gas giants. This is already implemented for the release. The more funding means more of these cool game features like Volumetric clouds in addition to what's already implemented in the final release. The prototype your seeing in the live streams is all mostly place holder assets. Another two years of heads down development will produce so much more detail to these features. There is already gravity based orbital mechanics in place. The marks on the speed bar is the orbital velocity. That being said, every ship has enough thrust to make orbital mechanics completely unnecessary, although you could still use such methods to manoeuvre if you wanted. Some more information on the semi-persistent stretch goal. The $1.5 million stretch goal is to make Battlescape semi-persistent with the opportunity for players to build infrastructure. You will be able to place new space stations, planetary bases, and factories. Space stations will come in two different sizes: large and small. Both small space stations and planetary bases can spawn small to medium sized spacecraft. Large space stations will be the only entity in the game capable of spawning, rearming, and refuelling capital starships. If the semi-persistent stretch goal is achieved, every time a team receives credits its members will have some additional choices to make: Buy powerful new ships and weapons for a better offence. Build more factories to increase the team's rate of resource acquisition. Build more space stations and planetary bases so that you can spawn closer to your objectives, be they offensive or defensive in nature. A video of transitioning from space, out by the planetary rings, flying through the rings and pretty much belly flops right onto the planet's surface. Remember the prototype your seeing here has a lot of place holder assets and effects. It will become so much more. Watch from 17m40s The current 2015 kickstarter prototype which is available to the media and streamers is a small snap shot of some planets, its rings and a derelict space station. @ 1:1 scale. So it takes time to reach places. Space is really big. And another transitioning from a planetary surface dogfight over a mountain range right up through the atmosphere into space. And then into warp to escape the enemy fire. Watch from 6m33s A smaller and more deliverable goal for the development team is something they are keen to put across. I was one of those wanting the original game idea but this new reduced scope is still something worth backing, even at the lowest pledge level. The engine is pure digital art! Features to look forward to: Seamless interplanetary warfare across a procedurally generated, true to scale solar system. Dozens of planets and moons to explore and fight over. Volumetric clouds and atmospheric effects are in the $600,000 stretch goal. Volumetric clouds are rather computationally expensive, especially when you're using ray scattering models like I believe the I-Novae engine uses for its atmospheres. Keep in mind that those sky colours you see in game are calculated using physical scattering models. It's not just setting a sky colour. There's actual physics being done. Gas giants - Already implemented. Gas Giants - floating factories and outposts floating in the cloud layers. Gravity - Implemented. You can already freely orbit planets in the prototype. The surface gravity of gas giants isn't that impressive, though. Even Jupiter's surface gravity is only a little more than 2x that of Earth's. Atmospheric drag is already implemented. Weather would compound that. Again, that's the $600,000 stretch goal. From station fly-through, then onto crater scared desert planet surface. Discover Infinity: Battlescape for yourself - The engine is pure digital art! You can always post a question on the comments section of the kickstarter page here: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/309114309/infinity-battlescape/comments And a summary of the recent Reddit AMA: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/5853093/#Comment_5853093 And the FAQ is here: https://forums.inovaestudios.com/t/infinity-battlescape-faq/1112 https://twitter.com/INovaeStudios
- 365 replies
-
- battlescape
- infinity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Update 3: This is the last straw, I really really do not recommend this product! After all the disappointment you can read below, I discovered another huge problem... A dead pixel... This is really the last straw, I am done with this. I don't care anymore about the beautiful design and aluminium build quality nor the amazing colors on the screen. I payed too much money for this. I will try to return this and get a refund, but I'm afraid it will not be easy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello everybody, I little backstory, this schoolyear I began my freshman year at college here in Belgium. Therefore I needed a laptop. I’ve always used my gaming desktop. I definitely wanted an aluminium Ultrabook. I searched for one weeks and weeks. I was really interested in the Dell XPS with infinity display. But there were a few problems. The price, it was a really expensive laptop but ok, I would give the money for that. But then I found the XPS 15 with that display was not released yet. I didn’t want to pay so much money for a 13” laptop. I really wanted that laptop, but back in September 2015 I heard It will come out at the end of 2015. So that’s too late for school. I went with buying a temporary laptop which I would sell when I had the XPS 15. I bought an Asus Zenbook UX303 with a 5500u and Intel integrated graphics. I found it pretty cheap for 666€ 2nd hand only a day or 2 old, as good as new. Months have passed now and I finally got my XPS15! I am really starting to love that Asus Zenbook. It did so much right. This is my true and honest opinion from a person who payed the full retail price where I had to work my ass of at a holiday job. I am really picky, and I want the best of the best, this is why I bought the XPS. The model I bought has: - I7 6700HQ - 16GB DDR4 - 4K Touchscreen - Geforce GTX 960m - 500GB Samsung NVMe drive Here are my Pros and Cons: Pros: - Amazing screen! The colours are brilliant. - Pretty good speakers, they get very load and are surprisingly good for a laptop. - Keyboard is ok, not so much travel but pretty tactile. - Very nice trackpad (UPDATE 1: Altough the trackpad feels great, I seem to have a bit of trouble being precise with it, this seem to be a common problem, it's not too bad, but yeah. I use a mouse 90% of the time so not really a big problem) - Stunning build quality, the aluminium is almost pornographic. And the top lid is fingerprint resistant! - Great performance! Cons: - Headphone jack… This is a problem I worry about the most and I find the most disappointing… There is quite a lot of static noise on it. And it clicks a bit when the sound is enabled. You really hear the transition good. I have had this program a lot with tablet; but they were all cheap so yeah. The problem is caused by a bad design of the audio part on the laptop’s motherboard. it gets a lot of interference of the other components on the motherboard. I will probably buy a DAC because it’s pretty unbearable for me… Sad.. really sad.. - Little shift in red colors on weird viewing angels. When you look at the screen from a pretty weird angel the colors shift a bit, but that is ok. You will never watch your screen from that direction. - No numeric keypad, this is a “problem” I knew from the beginning. But I got used to working with shift + 1,2,3,4 etc due to my Asus, so yeah, a bummer but nothing too bad. - From my little time I have spend, I can say that the fans are pretty quite but the fan profile is a bit aggressive for my liking. - Bloatware, not too much but still too much.. - The hinge, this is another annoying one. You need quite a lot of force to open the hinge, so one finger opening is a nono. ( I had this on my Asus, so I will need to get used to it ) - High pitched noises from the screen adaptor? When something is changing on the screen you can hear quite a lot of high pitched noises coming through the fans grills pointed at the screen. It’s like a bit of a coil whine with GPUs. - Low quality camera, very bad low-light conditions. But I don’t us this much so, it’s okay. - Very weird problem where I haven't find the cause yet. The laptop boots quite fast (slower then the Asus) but when I close my lid and open it again, it takes 12 seconds or more before the login screen pops up. Those 12 seconds are just black screen. I can't seem to find anyone else with this. I will contact costumer support about this one next monday... UPDATE 2: I have found another pretty big problem... Screen ghosting, a lot of screen ghosting. I tested a game and it's very noticable. For my case it's okay, but it was to be expected from such a 4K panel. Another quite big dissapointment.. So for the gamers under us. I think the 1080p model would be better for that. I can still hook it up to another monitor for gaming but that defeats the point of a laptop. While testing with games I was abble to puch it quite heavy. I even played CSGO highest settings on 4K and it was very playable. It looked great too. The fans went too full throttle and they can get quite noisy. But not the annoying whining sound but more the whooshing, air moving one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you can see, there are a few cons, but most are not really a big deal. The one thing I’m the most disappointed about is the headphone jack issue.. Any other persons having this with there XPS? These are the things found with inly using it for an hour. I will update this for the interested from time to time. I hope I can help some people with this. With greetings, Thomas
-
"As we converge into a new age of graphics computing, we have gotten a good look over the years on what our consumers mostly consist of. We see a great variety of our users being gamers and editors alike. With this in mind, the team had to come up with something to give back to our consumers. After months of planning and revising, we came up with the Infinity program. What this will be is an inside look to what we are planning in the next 3 years to our most loyal of customers. Those who have purchased multiple generations of our products will be eligible to have an "Infinity" card. This will contain an exclusive access code that will allow these members to get newsletters and updates on upcoming projects like SHIELD or the next iteration of architectures. We hope this will give appreciation to our most loyal of NVIDIA users." said CEO Jen-Hsun Huang in an interview. http://www.techpowerup.com/199459/nvidia-launches-infinity-program-for-loyal-users.html Holy shit if this is actually true then fanboys are going to be really happy. My thoughts are that this will have to be closely monitored and have like proof of purchase and maybe even the physical card with the guys? Anyone think they would be eligible for this? EDIT: They removed the article? Ok this was an actually legit news so idk why they removed it... sorry for 404 Ok just to be clear: THIS IS NOT AN APRIL FOOLS JOKE. I clearly saw the article and the legitimacy looked sufficient. I'm guessing they will post it tomorrow so they don't need to backlash from the fanboys saying crap /rant
-
I'm unsure whether this will actually be considered an ultrabook but it has a 28W dual-core Haswell part with GT3 graphics, otherwise known as Iris 5100 (not the Crystalwell-enabled Iris Pro). Also, since the product is not to be released until Q4, a lot of information is lacking. Anandtech says there are rumours saying the display will have a 2560x1440 panel similar to Acer's newly announced 2nd gen Aspire S7. video: http://www.viddler.com/v/1a7d1dfa?secret=85958525 Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/03/asus-zenbook-infinity-gorilla-glass-3/ I'm personally not a fan of the GG3 lid, I would rather have seen another aluminium lid like the rest of their Zenbooks, although it does look very beautiful.