Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'response time'.
-
Hi everyone, I need some advise. I'm looking to acquire a new gaming monitor for my playstation console after being fed up with the delay from my old 45" LG plasma tv. I enjoy playing fifa and occasionally play a bit of shooter games and would like a better experience for my gaming. I was told that the benq monitor is essentially the best monitor for gaming by someone but after my research i found out through " displaylag.com " that the benq rl2455hm , asus vp228h and the asus vx238h all have 10ms input lag. These are the only monitors i am considering and need some advice. Correct me if i am wrong but i chose the asus monitors because of the higher contrast ratios being 100000000:1 and 80000000:1 respectively which i thought was a benefit when compared to the benq which has just 12000000:1 as i'd like much better colour reproduction. Please help me out with this.
-
I recently bought an LG 29UM59 monitor, and was looking around in the settings. i saw a setting called "Response Time", which went from OFF, to LOW, to MEDIUM, to HIGH. As far as I know, the lower the response time, the better. Why would anyone turn up the response time? And what does OFF mean? Can't possibly be no response time
-
Hello all, I am looking for a new monitor to add to my setup. I currently have a 23' IPS HP Pavillion Monitor, and I want an upgrade + another monitor to use as a dual-monitor setup. I have an RX 480, so I am looking for something with FreeSync. I am also looking for something where the "response time" is "allegedly" low. The panel type does not matter, although anything but TN is not the most preferred. This will be in a gaming setup, so anything over 60 Hz is what I'm looking for. 100+ is a good bonus. I'm also looking for a screen that's under 30" and I have a budget of $600 CAD Any suggestions from you guys is appreciated, Thanks.
-
Hello All, I am in the market for a new PC monitor! Right now I am gaming with an LG 2560x1080 @60 Hz IPS panel and I love it. I am curious about something, though. I understand that my 60 Hz monitor will give me 60 frames per second and nothing more, and I understand that a 144 Hz monitor will give me 144 frames per second and nothing more. I am under the impression that a 60 Hz monitor will be equal to that of a 17(ish) millisecond response time monitor. If this is the case, then if I buy a monitor with an 8 ms response time, will I be looking at a monitor that will give me something like 120 frames per second? What about a 4 ms response time, how many frames per second will my eyes actually be seeing? Sometimes I see monitors listed with a response time and a refresh rate, is there anything I need to keep in mind in regards to the two? Any input would be greatly appreciated, thank you!
-
I'm going for a monitor for gaming, and deciding between Dell's SE2717H and Asus' VG245H (both FreeSync and 75Hz), and not sure which one to pick. Obviously, overall, Dell's model is better, but has a 6ms response time, compared to Asus' 1ms. Which one is better to buy?
-
Hi! The main reason I need a good gpu and cpu is because I am running psychology experiments. These experiments require that there is a good response time acquisition by two softwares: Emotiv Testbench (https://www.emotiv.com/product/emotiv-pure-eeg/) and E-Prime PST Software 2.0 (https://www.pstnet.com/downloads/productsheets/EPRIME.pdf). The experiment design requires the subjects or the people playing the "game" will have to respond as fast as possible pressing either a key on a keyboard or a click on a mouse. The usual problem encountered with this is that E-Prime acquires the reaction time of the subject (translated to input lag from periferals) while it sends the stimulus or image (frame sync) to the Emotiv Testbench as a time stamp of the occured event (translated to cpu speed). While at the same time of performing the "game" the subject wears an Electroencephalograph and it record brain waves as in a Brain Computer Interface. E-Prime software has minimum hardware and software requirements. These are the requirements: E-Prime® 3.0 is compatible with PCs running: Windows® 10 64-bit Windows® 8/8.1 64-bit Windows® 7 SP1 32 and 64-bit Minimum Recommended Pentium i3 Processor 2GHz or higher 2GB RAM DirectX™ video card USB Port Pentium i7 Processor 2GHz or higher 4GB RAM or higher DirectX™ 11 video card with 128MB RAM or higher* Chronos® or a Core Audio sound card compatible for audio presentation USB Port Internet Connection** * DirectX 11 Hardware Acceleration required for Windows 8 and Windows 10. ** For installation and design purposes only. Not recommended during data collection. Please use Recommended hardware requirements for millisecond accurate timing while playing movies. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Can someone recommend a budget LAPTOP ranging from $100.00-$600.00 USD? Maybe recommend between quad core and dual core, low input lag and response time of monitor and periferals; and best cpu processing speed for the budget??
-
I wanted to get a new 4k gaming monitor. I was wondering what would be the best one for 27 inches or above with an IPS panel and sRGB 99% in the 400-500 USD range. I like the dell one(http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/monitors-monitor-accessories/ac/4009?~ck=mn&appliedRefinements=2586), but it has a 9 millisecond response time, which I heard is low. Is this one good (https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B01CH9ZTI4/ref=crt_ewc_title_dp_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER)? Please Advise...
-
Hi, after a month of hunting for a sweet little gaming monitor, within my budget, i need you guys help to make decision. 1.23MP68VQ, or http://www.lg.com/hk_en/monitor/lg-23MP68VQ-P Pros: Cons: 75hz refresh rate 5ms Response time 23.5 slightly higher pixel density IPS panel 2. LS24F350FHEXXM or http://www.samsung.com/my/monitors/led-sf350fhe/LS24F350FHEXXM/ Pros: Cons: 4ms response time 60hz refresh rate 24 inch curved monitor PLS panel Both have Amd Freesync and backed up by 3 years warranty. Help me to choose pls. 3.There are other alternatives, which have 60-75hz refresh rate,with everything else being same,BUT 1-2MS RESPOND TIME BUT WITHOUT FREE SYNC. Also most had TN Panel. Should i be better off with these monitors? Now, by my own calculation, 1ms=1000s so,1000/75=13.33ms is time before frames get updated at 75z, at 60hz its going to be even more, but that samsung have 4ms but slightly larger size. ,,would this be true in practice. Are those respond times good enough? I just cant make my mind which of the monitor to choose. Im not a professional gamer.So ,visual quality is more important, but with that said, since im going to game a lot, i need something that can provide a decent gameplay motions. ALSO I ,TRULY BUT VERY UNPOPULAR, i have motion sickness, i cant read book in a moving car , certain games like Deus ex human revolution or old counter strike with high fps causes NAUSEA.
-
1. IPS 8ms response time bad for gaming? 2. Will there be any ghosting or any difference? 3. Will using monitors degrade fps? Eg 3 monitors but just using 1 for gaming http://www.dell.com/ed/business/p/dell-p2314h/pd 4. Any difference between http://www.dell.com/ed/business/p/dell-p2312h/pd and http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=corp&sku=320-9511 Cant find any difference.
-
BENQ RL2455Hm(1ms,TN) vs LG 24MP88HM(5ms,IPS). Will response time make a lot of difference in FPS gaming?/
-
Hey guys I was just wondering what a good gaming monitor was for my $400-600 CAD budget. Things I'm looking for (preferably) include: 120hz or higher 1080p or higher 5ms or lower Decent colours reproduction Idc if it's ultrawide or flat tbh
-
I am about to get a new LED monitor for my PC. While I was searching for some monitors I found that some monitors had refresh rate in the specification while some others has response time in the specs list. I don't know what is the real difference between both these things...
-
so i found this on another tech forum, and im wondering if this is correct: “So assuming a 120Hz monitor and a 120 FPS output from the GPU, every 8.3333 ms (1/120th of a second) a new frame is generated and sent to the monitor to display. The pixels START changing colors. The response time is the time it takes for the pixels to go from the old frame color to the new frame color. The shorter the better obviously. In a 120Hz monitor if the response time is for example 1ms (for all pixels, see below) it will take 1ms for all pixels to change and then for the remainder of this cycle (7.333 next ms) the frame will be static. We can all see how if the response time is greater than 8.333 ms for a 120Hz screen this would be terrible as the pixels would never quite achieve the final color of the current frame before having to start displaying the next frame again.” also, if this is correct, does this mean if im getting a monitor that is 120hz, i will not have any ghosting, as long the response time is 8.33ms (1000ms / 120hz = 8.33ms) or less? and anything higher than 8.33, i may have ghosting? -
I'm looking for a 1080p monitor, around 100-130$, but I'm not sure about a couple of things: 1) Will there be noticeable difference between 1ms and 5ms response time? 2) Are 60Hz enough for gaming? (not competitive or esports or anything, just smooth, enjoyable gameplay in all games) 3) What level of brightness is considered ok for a monitor? That last one is because I came across the Asus VP228TE which is relatively cheap and looks great, with 1ms response time and everything, but its brightness is 200cd/m², while other monitors have a brightness up to 300-400cd/m². Will it be seriously dim? Thanks a lot!
-
I'm looking for a new monitor and want to know if a 5ms response time is generally noticeable over 2ms. I'm looking at LGs ultrawide series at the moment. I dont really have a high budget and I'm in Australia so stuff is usually like 70% more expensive -.-
-
I was searching for a 1440p, G-Sync, 144hz refresh rate and 1ms response time. At the start I found the BenQ XL2730Z, which looked amazing, but sadly, it's FreeSync... Then I found the Asus PG279Q, and when I saw the 165hz refresh rate, I became afraid the monitor doesn't love me, and that it won't be my boyfriend... Of course, after that, I looked at reviews online, and found out that there aren't many differences between 144hz and 165hz, which kinda disappointed me, but I still thought this is an awesome monitor. At Amazon, at the first line it says " Response time: 1 ms", which made me think I found the perfect monitor. But then, when I was about to update the list I made on PCPartsPicker, it suddenly was 4ms. This really confuses me, so I will ask here: What is the response time of that monitor?
-
My current main-monitor doesn't work properly anymore, so I want to buy a new one. Since I'm still a student i haven't got a ton of money. My main-priority for the new monitor is color accuracy, because I'm mainly working on photo und video editing (and grading). But I also game sometimes and now I found a very good (but also old) IPS monitor at a reasonable price, but it has a response time of 16ms. My current one has 5 ms and I have no idea if i am going to notice that and if it's going to affect anything, because must of the time People don't even accept something with 5ms soo... Are 16ms still ok for casual gaming and video editing and stuff? (Probably this is a stupid question, but i really don't know much about this topic.) Thanks for your help!
-
So I got the LG 22MP55 22" 1080p monitor a few years ago. I recently messed with some settings on it and found a setting called "Response Time". Looks like this: This setting has 4 possible values: 1) Off 2) Low 3) Middle 4) High So I thought it's simply the time that it takes for the monitor to display picture sent from the graphics card. And that's where the confusion started... Apparently on the manual it says " For a normal environment, it is recommended that you use 'Off'. For a fast-moving picture, it is recommended that you use 'High'." So after doing a research on the internet and doing some tests I found out that using "High" setting decreases ghosting (so fast moving objects are a bit less blurry). However I saw that alot of ppl complain of having higher "input lag" with this setting set to "high" so I'm really confused as to what's the optimal setting for me. I guess it's quite dependent on what you do? I play World of Warcraft sort of competitively and I try hard to optimize everything for the least amount of lag and delay so that I can see and react to things really quick. However if everything's too blurry when moving your camera around you won't really notice some things. I really don't know what's the best anymore. So if anyone has an LG monitor with the same setting, please let me know what you use and why. I assume that other brands and models have something like this aswell? Thank you in advance! Any knowledge on this topic would be helpful.
-
I want to know whats so special about frameless monitors.
-
I'm looking for a monitor (or small TV) for console playing (mostly on the PS4). It doesn't need to be any bigger than 24in as it will sit on my desk as a temporary solution until I get nice big TV next year. I'm after a screen suited for shooters, like BF4 and SWBF so good picture, low input lag/reponse time. So far I've picked this one out: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00UHAX95G http://www.samsung.com/hk_en/consumer/computer-peripherals/monitors/consumer/LS24E390HL/XK?subsubtype=series-3-led But I'm open to any suggestions please? :-) Should I presume I don't need anything higher than a 60Hz screen for the 60fps at 1920x1080, based on current gen console's limits? Thus don't need to spend a vast amount of money on this money. I'm keen on a monitor, rather than a TV, as it gives me more options. Teh above screen is PLS at 4ms. I read IPS is better though?
-
Hey guys. I am looking to get a new monitor soon and am looking at one of these 32 inch 1440p displays. I am passing on Samsung's offering because of that rose gold color and high response time/I'm put lag,and I like BenQ's offering but would rather have the sleeker look of the PB328Q. There aren't really ANY reviews of this monitor ANYWHERE. So, I am asking, does anyone here own this monitor? I am very curious to see if this monitor has a high response time/input lag on it. I know the monitor is advertised as a "4ms GtG" but with these VA panels, you never know. So far the BenQ is the fastest out of these three that I have found. I say this as I am curious to see if this monitor is close to or faster than the BenQ. Please, if anyone has ANY experience with this monitor, post it here! Not only will it help me, but it will also help anyone put there who is also looking to buy this monitor in the future. Thanks! P.S. I will be mostly gaming on this monitor. I am not a "hardcore" gamer nor am I a "casual" gamer. I mostly play modern AAA titles, TF2, and gMod. I don't care for CS:GO <- (Hopefully this statement clarifys what I mean with this whole "P.S.")
-
So my Genesis RX88 contains 4 buttons to switch (I think) the response time of the keyboard. Image: http://prntscr.com/9athao Actually 2 questions 1. Is this indeed the response time which you change? 2. Why would I want to go with for example a lower response time and not just always play on 1000HZ? Thanks in advance
-
Ok guys how bad is TN compared to IPS will i feel alot of difference if i went for 144hz // G-syng // TN instead of IPS Because 750Euro for 144hz // G-syng // IPS is extremely expensive !! Is 1440p worth over 1080p ? I never used anything higher than 720p and on the videos i watched i kinda dont feel anthing beetween this two. And just for info i will go 980ti GPU in both cases ( 1080p // 1440p ) i dont want to buy GTX970 or GTX980. I feel like i will be ok for long time with 980ti
-
Firstly, I would like to request a Monitor response time video on Techquickie (Just searched for it). Now on to my question. I just made a thread about looking for a monitor with low response time, most of the replies said that response time didn't matter at all, and others even replied it was just marketing, but really... If low response time doesn't matter, then what does it mean to have a fast monitor, regardless of resolution, refresh rates and G/Free-sync technologies. Please explain, because I'm so confused now.
-
Hi guys, Does anyone know if there is a good/bad response time for gaming? I have an 8ms monitor and was wondering if it's good enough. I've read about how 5ms is what you should go for, and I've read anything under 11ms is perfectly fine for gaming. I pretty much play all kinds of games from CS to hearthstone. Any input is greatly appreciated!
