Prlme

I plan on a modest overclock, yes
I like the looks of the hero w.o ponying up for a $400 mobo
 
Basically I;m trying to justify the cost of the mobo/ cpu upgrade. I think it makes more sense to get a slightly cheaper mobo with better cpu than the other way around. thoughts?

HAHA though I was the only one.

I know it's not out yet, but I literally search for it every day to see if there is new info.
 
I already have the money set aside for it, and I am chomping at the bit to get it
Anyone else in my position?


GIVE IT TO ME ACER!!!!

 
Pic for drools

this thread is stupid
 
nvidia saw the potential in variable refresh rate - and went to create a FULL solution.
AMD was literally sitting on verge of it's tech completely CLUELESS of it's potential
 
nvidia has ALWAYS been a company about offering a FULL, ease-of-use solution for it's consumers. GeForce Experience driver update reminders, GFE recommended settigns (because, NEWS FLASH, there are lots of PC gamers out there that don't care to waste time tweaking settings, believe it or not), shadowplay and easy twitch streaming, GPU Boost 2.0, no extreme over-volting in FAVOR of reliability for consumers, removing features/configs because they don't always work (remember when you used to be able to SLi cards with different vram amounts? nvidia removed it because it wasn't 100% reliable - they would rather remove possible frustration from more consumers than they would offer the ability to the select few) 
 
nvidia wants consumers to know that if it's their product or tech, that it will work. The only way to do G-sync to a level acceptable by their standards, was by doing the module themselves. You don't see G-Sync modules slapped in every monitor out there do you? NO - because nvidia is tuning EVERY single panel that it goes in themselves. They are committed to providing FULL solutions that carry their name.
 
http://overlordforum.com/topic/603-nvidia-g-sync/page-5
 
 
I love how NOBODY remembers that AMD couldn't admit that nvidia came up with a good idea and implemented it before them
 
what's that? you think that's bullsh--??
 
go read here:
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/174371-amd-claims-it-can-offer-the-benefits-of-nvidias-g-sync-with-a-free-driver-update-nvidia-rebuts-fight
 
 
 
 
 
and another:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7641/amd-demonstrates-freesync-free-gsync-alternative-at-ces-2014
 
 
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
 
BUT THAT'S NOT THE STORY AMD WANTS YOU TO REMEMBER. THEY WANT YOU TO REMEMBER THE NAME FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - SYNC.
 
They want you to think of Free-Sync as the white knight savior to the world. They want you to constantly think that what nvidia did was wrong.
 
Nvidia is pushing graphics tech beyond just graphics cards yet again. Gamestream, DSR, g-sync.....and they are committed to the technologies they research and develop. They want it to work fully - and they did. They committed to it. But no - you all have to buy into AMD's marketing. That seeing a flaw in current display technology, recognizing the problem, recognizing a solution, and fully committing to provide a FULL solution - yes, what a GOD AWFUL thing to do for a company........BECAUSE THEY WANT TO CHARGE FOR THEIR WORK? OH GOD THE HORROR!