zSanosake

The Sony Playstation 3, the superior gaming platform

It has intel inside even though AMD is better.

snickeriN griN laffiN

When your argument is something being "overrated", you know you are a weak downright idiot with no brain power whatsoever. You're the one being dismissive, with your illogical fallacies against my posts. Do you know the words of power scaling and power levels? PL/PS for CPUS = One is marginally better, scale it to the next. One has marginally better cores, scale it to one that benchmarks better. You know nothing about CPU architectures because you support the gimmick that is "hyperthreading". AMD has 4 bundles, 2 cores in each for EIGHT PHYSICAL CORES, Intel doesn't register as shit, that's windows doing that, if you were to do hyperthreading on another OS? LOL. AMD runs faster, can handle more problems, can render better, has the price, and all in controls the budget marketline of PC gaming, because not everyone has a ton of money. It has better overclocking, better architecture, and multiple capabilities intel just can't put up fists too. It's overall better. AMD is the highest end of processors. Processors like the 4670k and the 3770k are comparable to the Athlon 740k and the 750k at most, which athlon would win.

So "overpriced and overrated" is your argument for corsair vengeance but your argument for AMD is "underpriced therefore it's bad" LOL? You really need to step up, you keep showing me your lack of logic and proof. AMD is better. PS and PL? Wow, you try to debate me and don't know two basic debate terms.. the POWER SCALING of AMD and the POWER LEVELS of AMD. And NO This does not mean consumption. I've come forth with the truth, logic, and reasoning. You lost this debate.

Um, no. You don't understand the architectural foundations of AMD, how Advanced Micro Devices works, or anything of the sort. Like value, pricing logic, you're clearly new to this. Overclock an 8GB set of RAM from AMD and compare it to a G.Skill trident, Ripjaws, or anything of the sort, even corsair vengeance which is better than G.sKill. You can not. you do not understand the logic, reasoning, PS, or PL of AMD, nor do you get architecture, but you so claim you do, asserting no proof, bias benchmarks, and NO LOGIC. That's pretty non-sequitur. Back at my home forums, you'd be smashed and thrashed and labeled a failure.

G.Skill makes okay ram, but no one will ever beat out my previous overclocked AMD Ram on my old 2013 rig. It was 8GB DDR3-1600, but it could easily compete with a Corsair Vengeance LP at DDR3-2400 and 16GB.

If you don't have these parts yet -- don't get them. I have them and I want to take the shit back. It is the ONLY SUBPAR intel processor in comparison to AMD, you would be much better off going with an 8120 or an 8320, they are marginally better than the 4790k and so is the 4770k, because it is considered equal to the 8350. If you have the budget for all of this, go 9590, which is on par with Intel Zeon.

AMD FX-4100 and up.

B85 is 10x better.

Yes, the 8350 does. There is no such thing as a "cpu-intensive game" and if so, AMD performs it better. AMD works hard in it's cores and physical performance and value to give you the BEST POSSIBLE PERFORMANCE and has 8 physical cores that operate together. Learn more about architecture. AMD trouble live-streaming? I'm certain you do not watch many livestreams.. lol, a 2nd gen processor can handle livestreams. Fail much..? I did cite my evidence. Here's what AMD has. 1. AMD vs Intel - Value - AMD WINS 2. AMD vs Intel - Cores - AMD WINS 3. AMD vs Intel - Base GHz - AMD WINS Because it is the ONLY good Intel CPU in my opinion. Gaming is solely based off of cores (while I do miss my 8 cores I had with my 9370 build T_T), gigahertz, and GPU POWER. Which would get higher fps? An A10 with Dual 780 TI's or An i7 with a 7970? EXACTLY.

Wow, trolling now? Trolling died in the IRC days. Your use of ad hominem and ad ignorantiam are very high here, guys. I'm looking for a solid debate but you are ignoring reasoning, logic, ps, pl, sticker, and architectural funding, along with even value.

Lol. You aren't a TRUE amd fanboy until you get the logic, ps, pl, and basic reading - the sticker specs, even the architecture. You know nothing. Hyperthreading is a gimmick. Threads =/= cores. You benefit more from core performance than your gimmicky "hyper-threading". Learn more about the architectural build of processors and about AMD's physical cores and value. The Athlon 750k is enough to handle the 4670k, the 760k indisputably stomps it via logic, ps, pl, and sticker specs. Benchmark that. Could say the same for you. Value, LOGIC, PS, AND PL declare your argument and "status" invalid. Take a look at the cores and the gaming differences, along with the smooth performances. Intel is bad, you just can't see it.

The 8350 is equal to the 4770k. Deal with the PS, and PL. It's illogical to say otherwise, I guess the 8350 is pitiful? You asserted it's 8 cores were a gimmick, yet you say it's weak due to such. They hold much higher ability via the bundles and the packages and the core difference. Learn stickers and architecture. Fanboy..

Rant - People Using Intel At All With Amds better Value Wrong. Looking in the mirror, Mr. Ad Hominem?