tobben

nice nice , and lol, i would expect as much on 0.00%.

They seem to have been abit inconsistent with this, i'm not sure how it is right now.. But, my first suggestion. Try setting your threads to an even number, ie 6. You might be getting blocked for that reason.

If you haven't folded before, do that ^ Otherwise you aren't eligible for QRB, (quick return bonus) which in turn means alot less points. You can find links and stuff in the FAQ Passkey link is here: http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/getpasskey.py Otherwise you need to wait for abit for the client to give reasonably accurate estimates.

Welcome to all new members! There is your cookie. Cookie updated.

Just for the record, the first badge is the contributor/member badge, which you get at 21 work units. A milestone you are likely to hit before 1 million points. Aswell as the FAQ linked above, there is also the installation guide here. If you have any specific questions, i am sure people will be happy to answer to the best of their abilities.

Seems like they might be having some problems, it isn't working on my end either.

Aha, i see, thanks Different than what i was thinking about.

Probably what i would go with, the whole reason for getting the second card is that it's a huge pain in the arse to constantly pause and unpause folding whenever you are doing something different. Then maybe you forget to unpause when you go to bed, potentially 8 or more hours wasted until you notice. You don't have to consider loss of QRB whenever you are gaming or doing something else, etc.. If you are looking for an alternative to a dedicated card, you could just leave the second card folding all the time. Potentially fold with the first card whenever you feel like it, that will leave more of an impact on the power bill though.

Github is a fairly trusted resource as far as i am aware, nothing is 100% foolproof though. Might be better safe than sorry.

How did you do this exactly? I usually suggest experimenting with the indexes in the client. This sounds like a more reliable/easier approach. From another guy who doesn't know what he is doing

@kangk81 As mentioned above though, there is the FAHbench as one possible option for reasonable consistency. Admittedly i haven't used it myself, and i don't know how it correlates to actual folding performance. https://folding.stanford.edu/home/download-utilities/

I am not sure what the intention behind this topic was, but i doubt there is enough content or food for discussion to warrant its own thread. - Locked

Sorry but the rules on advertising are clear. - Locked