alamox

it didn't, they downclocked the desktop Ryzen to 2.2GHZ instead of it's 3.6GHZ stock or 4GHZ OC

these are not gaming cpus, logicaly AMD's are going to be better, so why would they slash the price, they can go for good margins, and they would still be much cheaper than intel.

nvidia made more money, because AMD didn't introduce any product on 300$+ segment, it's not because of the switch....and that doesn't happen often, having free market to grab, Q3 results will probably be much lower than Q1 although it's supposed to be better, because AMD will have a competing product on 300-500$ range.

their revenue increased by 18% compared to last year, who ever thinks AMD's Q1 results are idiots, most of the money from Ryzen isn't in yet, because AMD doesn't get paid at front, it's not a supermarket, beside they have full segments that are not covered yet by any products, and tons of new products coming, Naple, R3, Vega, APU, mobile, OEMs....
and the stock drop is expected nervous ppl tend to dump before results when they dont like risk or cannot afford risk, and it will go back up pretty fast.

their revenue increased by 18% compared to last year, who ever thinks AMD's Q1 results are idiots, most of the money from Ryzen isn't in yet, because AMD doesn't get paid at front, it's not a supermarket, beside they have full segments that are not covered yet by any products, and tons of new products coming, Naple, R3, Vega, APU, mobile, OEMs....
and the stock drop is expected nervous ppl tend to dump before results when they dont like risk or cannot afford risk, and it will go back up pretty fast.

if any other company owned windows and wanted to do so much change on the OS as microsoft is doing rightnow, they would have offered windows 10 for free, then launched a paying version of windows classic(open), but microsoft knows that even if they did this, ppl will buy the paying version to have an open OS,rather than get a free adware OS, that is windows 10.
but microsoft lacks any integrity, and they know the changes they are making to the OS are not welcomed, and yet they keep pushing it down your throat, just because they have the monopoly over mainstream gaming OS( which they don't hesitate a second to take it hostage in order to to force user's hands )

if any other company owned windows and wanted to do so much change on the OS as microsoft is doing rightnow, they would have offered windows 10 for free, then launched a paying version of windows classic(open), but microsoft knows that even if they did this, ppl will buy the paying version to have an open OS,rather than get a free adware OS, that is windows 10.
but microsoft lacks any integrity, and they know the changes they are making to the OS are not welcomed, and yet they keep pushing it down your throat, just because they have the monopoly over mainstream gaming OS( which they don't hesitate a second to take it hostage in order to to force user's hands )

so the switch is out, and it really didn't take long for some serious issues started showing up, from frustrating to completly broken, makes you wonder if Nintendo actualy tested their system prior to launch, because some problems seem impossible to slip through any basic filter, like the dock scratching the screen of the switch, the control synchro, but mostly the graphic glitchs, the latter looks to me like inadequat cooling for the tegra chip, or memory, or faulty parts.
but the point is for the number of switch out there, they shouldn't be this common literaly days after release.
anyway enjoy the video, and if you have bought a switch, leave a comment bon your own experience.
cheers.

Ryzen doesn't have the issue, it's the Asus motherboards that got the issue, that they will patch later on.
beside ppl need to understand that Ryzen is a completly new architecture, it's not an old one that is being revised and tweeked for few generation, so at launch you are bound to run to some issues, motherboards will mainly focus on stability, then we will see mobos focusing on overclocking.

well we learned that vega :
1- at the minimum performance is higher than GTX1080
2- the GPU as 16GB of HBM2 memory
3- the IPC of the GPU is higher, and more efficient NCUs utilization
4- multiple new techs that help boost performance and power draw
5- the use of virtual memory to increase Vram limit, in apps super hungry.
 
and Ryzen we learned that :
1- we wont get special editions to overclock them, since they will be all unlocked.
 
 
 

well we learned that vega :
1- at the minimum performance is higher than GTX1080
2- the GPU as 16GB of HBM2 memory
3- the IPC of the GPU is higher, and more efficient NCUs utilization
4- multiple new techs that help boost performance and power draw
5- the use of virtual memory to increase Vram limit, in apps super hungry.
 
and Ryzen we learned that :
1- we wont get special editions to overclock them, since they will be all unlocked.
 
 
 

Nvidia have no reason to release the Ti  right now, i am 100% confident that the Ti will be released after Vega, if vega takes a year to be released so will the Ti.
nvidia have 1080 and TitanP to milk away.

well we learned that vega :
1- at the minimum performance is higher than GTX1080
2- the GPU as 16GB of HBM2 memory
3- the IPC of the GPU is higher, and more efficient NCUs utilization
4- multiple new techs that help boost performance and power draw
5- the use of virtual memory to increase Vram limit, in apps super hungry.
 
and Ryzen we learned that :
1- we wont get special editions to overclock them, since they will be all unlocked.
 
 
 

well we learned that vega :
1- at the minimum performance is higher than GTX1080
2- the GPU as 16GB of HBM2 memory
3- the IPC of the GPU is higher, and more efficient NCUs utilization
4- multiple new techs that help boost performance and power draw
5- the use of virtual memory to increase Vram limit, in apps super hungry.
 
and Ryzen we learned that :
1- we wont get special editions to overclock them, since they will be all unlocked.
 
 
 

do you even understand what's going on ? just so that you know any information released to  reviewers or even AIBs/OEMs end up at both vendors, thats just how it works.
the issue again that a GPU vendor send specific drivers to reviewers ONLY, these reviewers do benchs with those drivers to show case the performance of that GPU to the public, if those special drivers contain more of these renderer discrepancies they could have a significant impact on the reviewed performance and the real world performance of a GPU.
that is why this is leagues more concerning than AMD getting hold of that very special driver, and if you dont see it then you have a serious problem.
this could very well be an isolated issue, or could be much worse, it's not from me to investigate, but you seem to completly dismiss it to try and hang to something really trivial in comparaison, and wide spread in the industry, corporate spying isn't new, and this hardly qualifies, if you release driver to hundreds of ppl and expect it not to leak.

do you even understand what's going on ? just so that you know any information released to  reviewers or even AIBs/OEMs end up at both vendors, thats just how it works.
the issue again that a GPU vendor send specific drivers to reviewers ONLY, these reviewers do benchs with those drivers to show case the performance of that GPU to the public, if those special drivers contain more of these renderer discrepancies they could have a significant impact on the reviewed performance and the real world performance of a GPU.
that is why this is leagues more concerning than AMD getting hold of that very special driver, and if you dont see it then you have a serious problem.
this could very well be an isolated issue, or could be much worse, it's not from me to investigate, but you seem to completly dismiss it to try and hang to something really trivial in comparaison, and wide spread in the industry, corporate spying isn't new, and this hardly qualifies, if you release driver to hundreds of ppl and expect it not to leak.

do you even understand what's going on ? just so that you know any information released to  reviewers or even AIBs/OEMs end up at both vendors, thats just how it works.
the issue again that a GPU vendor send specific drivers to reviewers ONLY, these reviewers do benchs with those drivers to show case the performance of that GPU to the public, if those special drivers contain more of these renderer discrepancies they could have a significant impact on the reviewed performance and the real world performance of a GPU.
that is why this is leagues more concerning than AMD getting hold of that very special driver, and if you dont see it then you have a serious problem.
this could very well be an isolated issue, or could be much worse, it's not from me to investigate, but you seem to completly dismiss it to try and hang to something really trivial in comparaison, and wide spread in the industry, corporate spying isn't new, and this hardly qualifies, if you release driver to hundreds of ppl and expect it not to leak.

do you even understand what's going on ? just so that you know any information released to  reviewers or even AIBs/OEMs end up at both vendors, thats just how it works.
the issue again that a GPU vendor send specific drivers to reviewers ONLY, these reviewers do benchs with those drivers to show case the performance of that GPU to the public, if those special drivers contain more of these renderer discrepancies they could have a significant impact on the reviewed performance and the real world performance of a GPU.
that is why this is leagues more concerning than AMD getting hold of that very special driver, and if you dont see it then you have a serious problem.
this could very well be an isolated issue, or could be much worse, it's not from me to investigate, but you seem to completly dismiss it to try and hang to something really trivial in comparaison, and wide spread in the industry, corporate spying isn't new, and this hardly qualifies, if you release driver to hundreds of ppl and expect it not to leak.

easier yet, why not make them public, reviewers in the first place shouldn't accept to test hardware with drivers that are never released to the public, if the driver is not ready then the hardware is not ready, and often these type of things are spoted by chance when millions use it, so it's not the reviewer's job to find that out.
do you really believe Nvidia doesn't spy on AMD ? with this behave like professionals ? if a corp doesnt spy on their competitor then there must be a problem, and the release of latest top end GPUs peformance and time frame should be clear enough on how good nvidia is at spying on AMD.

easier yet, why not make them public, reviewers in the first place shouldn't accept to test hardware with drivers that are never released to the public, if the driver is not ready then the hardware is not ready, and often these type of things are spoted by chance when millions use it, so it's not the reviewer's job to find that out.
do you really believe Nvidia doesn't spy on AMD ? with this behave like professionals ? if a corp doesnt spy on their competitor then there must be a problem, and the release of latest top end GPUs peformance and time frame should be clear enough on how good nvidia is at spying on AMD.

do you even understand what's going on ? just so that you know any information released to  reviewers or even AIBs/OEMs end up at both vendors, thats just how it works.
the issue again that a GPU vendor send specific drivers to reviewers ONLY, these reviewers do benchs with those drivers to show case the performance of that GPU to the public, if those special drivers contain more of these renderer discrepancies they could have a significant impact on the reviewed performance and the real world performance of a GPU.
that is why this is leagues more concerning than AMD getting hold of that very special driver, and if you dont see it then you have a serious problem.
this could very well be an isolated issue, or could be much worse, it's not from me to investigate, but you seem to completly dismiss it to try and hang to something really trivial in comparaison, and wide spread in the industry, corporate spying isn't new, and this hardly qualifies, if you release driver to hundreds of ppl and expect it not to leak.

i hope Xbox division is next, so that microsoft stops destroying PC gaming.

Finaly i found out how to post videos lol took me forever hahaha, anyway here
 
 
 
 

personally i think one of the biggest delusions publishers, studios have is the stability of mobile games, they think because alot of ppl bought smartphones and discovered a novelty of gaming on android that pushed nice revenue numbers, that it is an indicator for ppl's interest on mobile games, this is misguided!
me too i saw ppl get a smartphone, then discover it has games and start playing, almost all of them stopped, that discovery feeling faded quit fast, and now they dont game on mobile anymore,  and for a company to decide to switch from console to mobile gaming is insane, i dont see a future for it

Finaly i found out how to post videos lol took me forever hahaha, anyway here