Mikealongo

Still same resullts Here another Bench from other reviewer

Yes, the test is in NVMe mode

The RND4K Q32T6 is not even close, Im like 1700 MB/S on the reads and 1500 on the writes, and those results (Kitguru) are far far from advertised aswell I dont know what more to try

I run a Userbenchmark test: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/65392178 Please help I´m getting mad trying things

I dont really know what to do... Should I upgrade to W11 and see´s if it help? its something from the BIOS that is bad configured? I guess that its not the drive bevauste I had the very same problem years ago with the 970 EVO (i posted here also ) And after Windows crashes and forces me to make a clean install, it seems to work a little better... Maybe its the same... But I can´t find the problem need some help

Maximum of 35 % usage during random writes reads 45 C - 50 C Not overheating i think Edit (more info): Updated BIOS, no changes I Cloned a 970 EVO using Samsung Magician. The offset of th drives are:

Hello to everyone I just Bought a Samsung 990 Pro NVMe and when testing with CrystalDiskMark my Random numbers look way off comparing with the same test from other guys. My system is: CPU Ryzen 3700x Motherboard Asus strix X570 Gaming E RAM 32 GB G.Skill 3200 GPU EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 PSU EVGA superNOVA 850 G2 Operating System Windows 10 The drive is in the first slot and I have a 970 Evo in the other that also performe badly I have the latest firmware Do you know whats happening? Thank you in advance Mine: Other Guy´s

Hi, Yesterday I just installed my second monitor (both via Display Port) and today, when I started my PC and run Ryzen Master, noticed that it opened in the second monitor and inmidiately crashes. Im not able to change the display it starts in (even with win + shift + right or with the display port disconected from the second display) Is there a way to fix it? I looked in the internet and 2 years ago some people had the same problem and kind of fixed it without moving to the secondary display, my problem is that it only starts in that display. Thank you in advance

Thank you for your fast response! I will turn HDR off then

Hi, I just bought and installed a Samsung Odyssey G5 LS27AG500NU, my first HDR display, and i was playing with settings and when i turned on HDR (both in windows and in the display settings), the colours get much washed out and with a blue hue than with de sRGB mode. I know that ther is a slider that adjust brightnes but with the slider at 100% the white just get burned... Is just me, is there any option there that i should be awere of? Thank you

I see... I dont know if this add info, but with my 980 the gpu was always at 99 - 100 %, but i gues that it was because i was gpu bounded?? My concern is that the gpu or cpu are faulty or if im cpu bounded By the way, thank you for your help i really apreciated

The game runs ok, but sub 144 fps so i prefer at least reach the 144 fps Thats something that i thought. I guess that some games are single core, but the % of utilization isnt 100% because doesnt use all the cores ¿? But in some places i reached 250 ish fps 1440 p To clear something, in gpu benchmarks it reaches 100 %

I just noticed something, that is that when playing some game neither my gpu or my cpu hits 100 % usage in note fps capped games. I thought that FPS will always increase untill one or another reaches 100 % utilization an then stay there. Am I wrong? My GPU is EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 CPU Ryzen 3700x RAM 32 GB G.Skill 3200 The game was FFXIV, but i had notice in other games aswell

Thank You for your message. I forgot to answer something you have said before. I have all the "peripherals" that I need (almost), I have everything from my main computer even a 1440 p display :). For mouse I have an MX Master 3 from logitech (because of work) so budget can be exclusive to the laptop Regarding the VM, they asked for something capable of running them, but even if the M1s are able to im not used to de Mac ecosistem. Once again thank you

I have 3 more contenders and some, as you said are gone due to the fact that i don't need the 4k res. -ASUS ZenBook 13 OLED (UM325UA-KG083T): Ryzen 7 5700 U, 16 GB RAM, 512 NVMe ROM, 1080 p display. 1099,00 € thoughts: 8 Cores 16 threads, I dont know if more threads will be beneficial for the tasks that data science or analys will use, but more is better right? xD -ASUS ZenBook 13 OLED UX325EA-KG245T: 17 1165G7, 16 GB RAM, 512 PCI ROM, 1080 p display. 1199 € thoughts: I dont really know why this model is 100 € more than the Ryzen one, more boost i guess¿? PCI memory is the same as NvME? I think yes but now i have the doubt -ASUS ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LI-BN010T: i7 10750H, 16 GB RAM, 512 PCI ROM + 1 TB Mechanic, 1080 p, GTX 1650 Ti. 1499 € thoughts: Bigger 15.6", gpu, numeric pad, 10 th gen cpu, maybe better thermals? charge via CC -ASUS ZenBook S UX393EA-HK003T: i7-1165G7, 16 GB RAM, 512 NVMe ROM, 3300x2200 display. thoughts: gorgeous, a ress that i dont even know wich aspect ratio is ¿? 3:2?. - Dell XPS 13: i7-1185G7, 16 GB RAM, 1 TB NvMe ROM, 1200 p display (no touch). 1399,00 € thoughts: I really love this aspect ratio, but the fact that you said that the performance is behind others because of thermals makes me think that wont be a good option, I guess that if they ask for this requirements is because we will use them xD Final thoughts: I love the 16:10 aspect ratio, the lenovo ones that you mentioned lacks on one or another point (9th gen, 8 GM RAM...) Im realy new buying laptops, with pc parts is just easier xD, I want a laptop that will performe good and I will pay more if the price is justified, but somehow im seeing almost the same specs with a 300 € diference in price and dont know why One more time, thank you for your pacience