Syntaxvgm

It amazes me that people accuse @LinusTech of this kinda shit or even blame him when we hear a new story every day of how broken youtube is, mostly because of changes to their content ID system.

Youtube is out of control, the tail rotor stopped moving and they're just riding it down until it's basally a place to watch shit like Jimmy Kimmel and not user created content like the original "broadcast yourself" slogan. It's probably going to be reborn as this new corporate friendly thing- instead of replacing network television it will become the new version of network television. 

Of course it's automated. I would assume FSM had this shit on content ID as a lot of people simply reupload and monetize videos (happened to lmg many times I think) and it's literally shitty enough that if you do not content ID your content, you have a higher chance of getting your own content hit. I mean it wasn't even LMG that had the ID in the system it sounds like, just FSM. 

The mistake was assuming everything would continue to be bad like youtube always has been, not this new level of what I personally would call platform destroying- if it's kept up. 
I have no idea why anyone would give LMG shit for this.

Even before this recent content ID problem people's own voice, videos of static, or blank videos would be hit with content ID in tests. Do people just not assume it's youtube being the raging refuse fire that it always has been? 
 

what?

password1 is 9 chars. 
Get fucked haxors. 

password1 is 9 chars. 
Get fucked haxors. 

password1 is 9 chars. 
Get fucked haxors. 

Nah ya'll gotta remember, this was automated and they simply just don't give a fuck. They aren't actively knowingly targeting his name, they just won't ever solve these problems. 

Celebs get special treatment and exemption from rules if money is there a la Jimmy Fallon 

Credit to: @GoldenLag @TVwazhere @WoodenMarker @Stefan Payne @seon123 @fasauceome @Twilight @valdyrgramr @Jurrunio @AluminiumTech
 
This thread is meant to guide you through your build of choice, on a per part basis. we'll include some samples for reference.
 
To start, we recommend PCPartPicker to make the whole list together, where you can also see prices from selected retailers
 
Step 0: Guidelines
Step 1: CPU
 
Step 2: CPU Cooling
 
Step 3: Motherboard
 
Step 4: Memory
 
Step 5: Storage (SSD)
 
Step 6: Storage (HDD)
 
Step 7: Video Card
 
Step 8: Case
 
Step 9: Power supply
 
Step 10: Operating System
 
Step 10.1: Linux
 
Step 10.2: Windows
 
Step 10.3: MacOS:
 
Step 11: Monitor
 
Step 12: Extra fans, thermal compound, fan controllers
 
Step 13: Networking
 
Step 14: Sound
 
Step 15: Peripherals
 
Step 16: reference builds
 
Picture as banner
 

No, of course not. 
Youtube doesn't have those limitations. Really it makes twitter the least viable alternative. That would be like saying vine could replace youtube, but slightly longer clips. Don't kid yourself, 140 second 360p videos are not similar to youtube. Youtube serves nearly any video length, and even before it did in like 05 the limit was at least 10 minutes.  As I said before, if your requirement is simply serving video, LTT running on IPS4 (or about any site you can upload videos to) is closer as a platform than twitter ignoring the infrastructure requirements. 
If they decided to promote themselves as a video platform, to "broadcast yourself" if you will, be pretty much all about the ability to do videos and nothing else, they cannot handle that volume of streaming traffic, even with their existing user bases and just converting the platform to video centric
the answer is no, someone would have to make large changes to their platform to take advantage of that opportunity to replace youtube. Twitch probably, just like youtube had the infrastructure to serve live streams twitch is the closest to ready to handle permanent video in that volume (probably lack the storage currently though). Unless you believe something like bitchute would catch on, and I don't.

cool so your argument doesn't hold water. Just because a site serve video and allows you to share it doesn't make it a YT replacement . 

Content like LTT doesn't happen on any of those other platforms, as they are not video providers first and they would not grow or survive, nor do most of them even offer the ability to upload long form content like that in high quality. The amount of bunny videos you can watch is not a metric of a successful video site in 2019. 

the fact that you'd claim twitter, facebook, tik tok or tumblr provide a video service that can in any way compete with youtube is laughable. You know that's not the case. 

they effectively are, there is no alternative that offers the same sort of service level youtube does. They are a monopoly both for their platform, and the audience they hold. Also their ability to consistently eat losses. 

Celebs get special treatment and exemption from rules if money is there a la Jimmy Fallon 

password1 is 9 chars. 
Get fucked haxors.