ShiverMePenguins

are terrible.
 
the end.

are terrible.
 
the end.

are terrible.
 
the end.

yes you do. you defamed a very smart man because of an article by some 20 year old retarded journalist wrote. journalism is all about skewing the facts and mis-quoting in order to provide the most sensational view and interpretation. this journalist shouldn't have been given the time of day to read this, because their own personal mis-interpretation of someone is silly because of the factual and absolute manner in which they commented on with their own bias remarks.
 
edit: i agree, pc's are more powerful than the newest consoles. but thats a raw spec datasheet. you can't account for things like operating system, new architecture etc. his comments are saying that it is new and better because of the sum of the parts, and i would tend to agree. for a system to not waste time with transfering data from vram to system ram, through a pcie interface, back through that pcie interface. it's just logical.

that is the complete quote. and yes, the architecture is much more efficient (by design) than current pc's. WHY? because there are majorly redundant parts that still exist on the pc that just shouldn't have to.
why do we still have ram thats not on-die? why do we still have seperate memory banks for cpu's and gpu's when we're at the point that we can just share it for quicker data transfers? i'm not talking about raw transfer, but reduced latency, shorter paths, etc. we have memresistor technology and the potential for parralelism greater than you can imagine. by integrating everything onto the same die, removing seperate "ram", and sharing the information with fewer points in between you get a BETTER ARCHITECTURE.
So this cto saying that console architecture is a step ahead is not far reaching at all (at least for the ps4). because think about it. a whole physical part has been removed from the equation while sacrificing nothing. obviously it is more efficient than the ps3, and has fewer operating parts than a pc. achieving same (or similar) performance while operating with fewer parts is better design. they just haven't made the consoles more powerful because of things like market demand, total cost, etc.
 
 
 
edit: the cto already goes on to say other factors than raw hardware that contributes to better performance. of course a 3000$ pc will be more powerful right now. but a 500$ one won't.
things like: a dedicated Os, software optimized for specific hardware, fewer physical operating pieces, years of development for one specific thing all take account to making a better system. and yes, within a year or 2 that will be redundant. it is the why computing works but as of now the new consoles bring new technology into play that improves the experience for everyone.

giving the journalist the time of day and posting an article that is nothing more than their own opinion is making someone look worse than they actually are.
 
just post the article to linkedin and leave it at that. emily gera has freely admitted personal bias in the past, and thats because of friends that are on the inside. why would that person be trusted to not mis-quote a man to give viewers a flawed look into someones personal opinion.
 
i'm not saying you are wrong, i'm saying she is wrong, and we should not let her get publicity.

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

"BAD THINGS WERE SAID HERE"
 
 
LIFE ON THE EDGE!!!

I hope you...
Paddled him.
Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh.
That actually sucks though

At least you don't live in a city where cops help out the criminals besides being the crooks as well.

Eww, reddit...
 
 
That's true. I have been hearing anti-Shia talk for years and years.

Another one of those threads...

fake, thats an old ass quadro card.

I.... I mean technically you're wrong. But you're still wrong. Everything is magnetic in some form or another.
ferro
dia
para
anti
 
And the magnetism of iron ions are the same of metallic iron: paramagnetic.
 
metallic iron has six 3d electrons, two paired and four unpaired which means it is paramagnetic.
the iron in your blood is found in the heme protein iron (II) with six d electrons, two paired and four unpaired (though it's missing both of its 4s electrons)
 
Both forms of iron exhibit the same form of magnetic susceptibility as each other.
 
 
So if you did indeed have a block of crystalline hemoglobin that block would be attracted to the magnet because of its iron content, so that's exactly why you're wrong. Granted the amount needed would be almost 1.356x that of the magnet in this article for it to be pulled directly from your blood, but thats beside the point.
 
When hemoglobin is dissolved in a red blood cell the situation is a slightly different. the heme will hydrogen bond with the liquid in the cell, which obstructs its lateral movement, kind of like a golf ball falling through a vat of Canadian syrup. Iron is only about 1/3 % of Hb by mass, so what you have is a very tiny human dragging a very large rock through a very thick syrup. A magnet would attract the iron in blood, however because of the pressure in the vessel exerted by other forces it would be swept away along with the blood vessel. That is why if the iron content was increased to above normalized levels in the human body it would have a greater chance of pulling the iron out, because the greater surface area to pull from would start to negate the pressure of blood flow (though with this powerful of a magnet you'd possibly die from poisoning first as a human body couldn't withstand the amount of... "polution" of having that many iron ions in your blood. The normal concentration of iron in blood is 60-170 ug/dL, or 6-17 ug per cm^3 blood. The density of metallic iron is 7.9 g/cm^3. basically, any given volume of metallic iron has about a .88 times as many iron atoms as the same volume of blood. In a 1 cm cube of blood, you'd have the equivalent of a lump of iron the size of a slightly goliathic-bacteria dissolved in the cube. So the magnetic force exerted to pull say a 1 ounce block of iron would needed to be increased by about 10,000 times (give or take a few thousand) to pull the Hb out of your body. OR... you could already achieve this by a semi complex array of magnetic structures, but then the human would definitely die.
Finally, the motion of the hemoglobin molecule would reduce the attraction. It rotates and moves within the RBC in varying ways, meaning it is attracted and repelled by other molecules nearby. A magnetic field would turn the Hb molecule so that the magnetic field of the iron atom is aligned with it, but intermolecular interactions between the Hb and other molecules "bumps" the Hb so that the Fe is sometimes turned the "wrong" direction in the field. The more often Hb is bumped and turned, the less effective the field is at attracting the Fe. At the so-called Curie temperature, the effect of the field is completely buried by the random motion. Hb-bound Fe++ isn't complete immune to the field, only less affected by it than it would be at a cooler temperature or in a less concentrated chemical environment.
 
 
 
So basically you're wrong. And I explained science-like exactly why you're wrong. So please I understand that while you may be interested in science and other things complex, do not misinform individuals based upon a introductory course of biology and/or physics. If I had the resources I could easily rip out the iron in a humans blood, it would just be impractical and quite honestly fucked up to do so. I mean basically what you're doing is pulling all the hemoglobin out, as the amount of ACTUAL magnetic force to separate an iron ion from its familial blood brethren would be about 3x greater than the amount needed to pull the heme out of you.

fake, thats an old ass quadro card.

Actually you'd find it does, as dilution plays an important aspect in magnetic force/electrical force.

Thanks for letting me know I needed to block another fucking retard.
 
Games should have a cinematic experience to better increase the integration aspect of gaming.
 
Now are you going to make yourself a lier, or are you going to pay me?

World at War MP is great, and the FIRST Modern Warfare is also pretty nice, but in the end all fall short of CS tho

The fact that Parliament has already allowed Muslim culture to invade and destroy much of britians Old standing cultural aspects is appaling. I'm all for extremely strict immigration laws, what with a good percentage of islamic teens participating in jihadist wars and murdering innocents in dozens of countries.