vitor_cut

So Ray trace without dedicated hardware, ???
 

So Ray trace without dedicated hardware, ???
 

This plus the 10nm problems, plus the problems in suply chain, this year is gething ugly for Intel
 

This plus the 10nm problems, plus the problems in suply chain, this year is gething ugly for Intel
 

Just when we thougth that the storm passed way, its disturbing. Lets hope that is heasy to fix. This is more bad news for Intel ia a not so good year for them, lets hope AMD and ARM are out of this as it seems.
 
Source: 
https://www.theregister.co.uk/AMP/2019/03/05/spoiler_intel_flaw/?fbclid=IwAR1cNJpT5I_xr1Up96BaAWrVDJrz_FAI0wiRH-mcy0qhlqTh5-cEyY47irE

This plus the 10nm problems, plus the problems in suply chain, this year is gething ugly for Intel
 

This plus the 10nm problems, plus the problems in suply chain, this year is gething ugly for Intel
 

This plus the 10nm problems, plus the problems in suply chain, this year is gething ugly for Intel
 

Now, I don't personally believe that Intel "knew about it" and chose to not fix the issue - that's some next level tinfoil hat conspiracy stuff.
 
But, one might argue they should do more testing for these kinds of bugs - especially after Spectre and Meltdown shamed Intel pretty badly.

What wasn't chiplet but yes Intel does have the tech to do it, EMIB.

More good news for Intel!
After totally messing up their 10nm process.
After AMD quadruppling their market share in Server market within a year (from 0,8 to 3,2%)
After AMD demonstrating 7nm hardware and even selling it without having anything to counter them

Yeah, looks good for Intel right now.
Some people might still try to defend Intel and claim "oh not that bad, they will survive". While frogetting that the manufacturing is the Prolbem that Intel has right now! The R&D is getting rediculously expensive, to a level where even Intel has Problems with that. And only the biggest FABs (like TSMC) are able to finance that...
 

The situation INtel is in is best described like this:
Your house is on Fire (=Intel) and the fire truck that is next to you caught fire before the fire fighters could reach your house.
 
After Spectre & Meltdown people are looking into this stuff and looking for other stuff.
Its obvious that the Processors most affected by that will be affected by other stuff as well.
 
 
PS: I still do not believe for one second that Intel didn't know about it or had its suspicions about it.
It might be the performance <-> Security 
 
 
 

*deep, hard groan and rather frustrated looks towards her Intel-box*

Yeah, that's quite severe...
 
Honestly, that's on Intel. They shouldn't have claimed it was a 95W TDP chip. They should have listed it as a 120W or 130W TDP chip if it can't reach its advertised turbo speeds at its rated TDP of 95W. Did anyone ever believe the 9900k would actually have the same TDP as the i5 9600k, which is also listed as 95W TDP from Intel? It's carrying the i9 branding so it wouldn't be too unrealistic or shocking to anyone if it was rated at 130W TDP.

It seems like the green team, was able to extract some impressive improvemnets on the 32 core Threadripper.
Mr. Ryan Shrout retested the 2990 WX and saw some interesting numbers.
In my opinion more instances as this one will happen, but the limited bandwidth inter CCX will be always felt in aplications as games.
It would be sweet if the rumours about X499 with 8 memory chanels turns to be true, it would be very nice for me for solidworks work load and CAM programing ,but i dont have much hope.
 
 
source: https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/New-GeForce-Driver-Fixes-Performance-Issue-Threadripper-2990WX-Tested

Things are looking good for AMD, they are making some cash
Source: https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/amd_cpu_sales_surpass_intel_cpu_sales_at_the_eu_retailer_mindfactory/1

@vitor_cut Please fix your post to meet Posting Guidelines for the Tech News subforum:
Don't put everything in a Spoiler, use the Quote function for quotes from the article and add some original input to the post, or the thread will be moved or locked. Thank you.

how the fuck is a 1% low framerate lower by 15.4 FPS better?

I think I've heard about this.  I saw it posted at least twice before... there was a screenshot of some forum post showing that Intel was basically gonna try to tell people how to review RyZen.  Yeah, no, they can kiss the reviewers' collective asses.
 
 
There must have been another reason for it.  Probably extremely poorly made or something, since any other reason would likely result in just getting locked and or moved.  LTT has nothing to hide   

thats why i said if it Close, Like 480 vs 1060, i am not going to buy shit just because.

And in OC3D site we have this numbers.
I might be wrong be this numbers are better than the article that op post. specialy the single treaded baseline.
 
https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/amd_ryzen_7_1700x_cpu_benchmarks_leak/1
 
 

That is a much more objective analysis of the "leaked" figures.
 
Everyone is looking at that, then ignoring the fact that a 3.4GHz CPU is going up against CPU's with as high as a 4.7GHz OC.
 
Whoever ran these benches either didn't have all the CPU's on hand (and thus picked out already submitted results), or intentionally made Ryzen look as bad as possible.
 
I assume it's the former, and that they simply needed to use pre-existing results to compare.

It's funny because if AMD perform poorly in general the comments would've been something along the lines of "What can you say, it's AMD's garbage drivers  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ " Yet since it's Nvidia in this case let's blame the company that ran benchmark tests.

they are litle more expensive and dont have as much ram and storage options, and for that price point they are only 15.3''

they call it clusters/module.
 
Basically, all AMDs products are MODULAR, thus they can mix and match any of their IP into a single product. Thus 4 cores is a "cluster" or package or whatever.
 
They got GPU modules (contains 1 ACE, 64 shaders, X ROPs, X TMUs each), memory modules, IO modules and now, much like bulldozer, they are looking to expand this system so that the minimum package is 4 ZEN cores.

it seems like things are getting better AMD lets hope ZEN and VEGA are good and make AMD profitable again
 
source: http://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/amd_announces_their_q3_2016_earnings/1