nokturrduk84

believe me, POT player is best!

Thx for such a big article, that is informational. I'll copy & save it in my facebook notes, in case I'll need to dig deeper on vram theme.

Pot player already provides me best quality. No need for this, but thx for article anyway.

My advice would be to sell it & get any 1150/1155 or at least 1156 socket system.

Added.
P.S. Nice overclock

trolollololololo.o

I really have only one thing to say about this... NVIDIA IS GREAT

AMD fan boys go in Nvidia topics, they say how AMD is better and then if you don't agree, they will block you ROFL

Yep. Nvidia is king. Now let's count how much AMD fanboys gonna cry in this thread, lol

Nvidia is great ! DSR ! PhysX !

Its a truth that too many people cant handle. AMD CPUs are a huge bottleneck, even more so with SLI or Xfire.

This kid thinks he just turned his monitor into an actual 4k display LOL.

SHITPOST

Very informative. I like it.

Seagate Barracuda is balanced enough.

1080p is a resolution not a bitrate, and not indicative of quality

https://www.bestvpn.com/blog/4085/proxies-vs-vpn-whats-the-difference/

I know but how is this a problem? I have nothing to hide besides torrents lol.

I'm aware of that, but I have nothing to hid so it's fine. If I was worried about torrents showing up or whatever it's fine. If I was to get caught for torrenting Rogers would have said something years ago. Lol. I know that they are keeping track of stuff though. However I doubt they're paying much attention. They are mostly looking for error reports and other software issues that they can fix by reviewing it.

Keylogger? Please explain.

If they don't want to do it then don't force them/him, before something goes wrong and they blame you for it.

Well, you get what you pay for. AMD CPUs are cheap because they suck & bottleneck high-end parts.

What are you trying to prove? Just because you have lets say 8 threads with moderate cpu usage doesn't mean you're getting performance of 8 cores. Check the BF3 screenshots I included (which even has one more thread than BF4), but it never takes advantage of 4+ cores/threads where as BF4 does a lil bit.
Also running one thread, you get #core0 at 50% load and apparently #core4 at 44% orsomething reported barely updating at the same time, never ever it reported a core at 100% load. Thread alternated between all the cores like 5000 times in a minute time think again if it's accurate especially if each core value isn't even updated at the same time and threads switching from cores that rapidly fast. Processexplorer shows you how much a thread uses of the CPU, far more accurate.

Look at taskmanager, apparently all cores with a single thread have been busy at the same time >.> HT disabled

7 threads, rest are nothing so ignoring them. How exactly is it spreading its load across all 8 threads with only 7 actually really using something of the CPU? Spreads evenly? That's something new. There's no such thing in games sadly.

Let this be a warning to all those buying AMD. You get what you pay. AMD is a joke.