Rym

The big problem with this is that it's not crispy or sharp by any means. On desktop yeah 1440p looks crispy sharp, in games however, especially in the newest ones it gets destroyed by TAA and looks like you need literal glasses or something. I really wish it were the case that 1440p is sharp and crispy both in desktop and in games, in RDR2 for example the destruction to image quality is...extensive, to say the least. Only fix I found was pure bruteforce with 4K resolution.

In my opinion instead of wasting money on irrelevant features such as adblock detectors that will ironically get blocked they could invest in making youtube premium worth it.

I'm very curious and would like to understand why OLED still experiences burn in quickly (1000-5000 hr) on static elements such as game HUDs when it's running at around 50-100-150-200 nits. Is the brightness really so great that the pixels still wear out this fast?

For 30-32 inches 1440 is the bare minimum, at 24 inches 1080p looks blurry and pixelated, at 27 inches there is obvious pixelation on the screen and text appears warped and strange. At 30-32 inches...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I have never seen a monitor / TV retain color accuracy, especially for whites and bright colors when it's brightness is too low. The image dims out too much and the colors simply look too dim and lose their vibrance, causing them to look weird.

Thanks for the info! Monitor is still in the return window, I ordered a different monitor which looking at google should have no BLB or at worst nowhere near the BLB of the LG and very good IPS glow generally, I'll wait for that one to arrive and if I like it I will return the LG one.

Unit: LG 27GP95R Issue: The unit is presenting backlight bleed on the lower left side, which is slightly tinted green and is visible in dark scenes and dark movies. Behavior: The backlight bleed changes intensity and location depending on whether I put pressure on the panel or the back of the panel. Placing pressure on the back of the panel removes the backlight bleed nearly entirely. Propossed solution: I hypothesize that this backlight bleeding is caused by improperly fit screws on the back of the panel, the screws are however hidden behind the panel rear, by tightening said screws in the location of the backlight bleed the issue would be solved in a satisfactory manner. The problem: Removing the back rear of the panel is not exactly easy, and I do not want to damage the panel itself in the process. There is no visible direct way to either remove or afterwards reinstall the back panel seamlessly. What I need help with: A video guide detailing how the back rear is removed properly, revealing the metal frame with the screws inside it that need to be tightened, and afterwards reinstalling the rear and the monitor on it's stand. Anyone ever tried this with their LG Ultragear monitor? Was it easy to remove / reinstall the back of the monitor? Placing something between the space of the panel and the bezel (very thin space) also affects the backlight bleed positively or negatively depending on location and type of pressure, but I don't have anything that small that would fit there and not be noticeable to further test how much that helps.

Topic no longer needed, please delete.

Thanks for the replies! Then I should remain with the M28U in mind, the LG is a bit much coming at 360~ euro more expensive. Am I right to understand that if I don't like DSC, I can run at 4K 120Hz without DSC?

I've been looking for a monitor upgrade to 4K, while the gigabyte m28u comes in highly recommended, it needs display stream compression to actually reach 144Hz. Is this a limitation of the monitor itself, and I'd be better off buying the samsung G7A LS28 or do all 4K monitors require DSC to go above 120Hz?

The more I look into it the more I think about it, like there is no good choice of a 1440p monitor. People say that it's the sweet spot but every 1440p monitor has a large flaw to it, and I've been thinking if the resolution is even worth the price or if I should just wait, add 200€ later and get a gigabyte M28U 4K monitor or something.

I've been looking a lot at my options within a budget of up to max 400€. I'm mainly gonna use it for gaming and watching movies / youtube, and will be switching from an aw2521h monitor. I'm looking for rich, immersive colors and a crisp, clear image. I can choose between this LG 27GP850-B monitor at 400€ or a few other choices which are the DELL S2721DGFA at 330€, Gigabyte M27Q (Q X and Q P are either out of stock or above 400€) and Asus TUF VG27AQ1A at about 330€. The MSI QD variant is selling for 660€ or so so I'm not considering it. Is the LG the best 1440p monitor in my budget? Lots of reviews seem to recommend it, it's cons seem to be a bad overdrive setting and low contrast ratio?

Hey! I've been thinking about the zero RPM feature on GPUs, for my model the temps go like so in desktop use: Zero RPM default: GPU slowly goes up to 55-60C over time until the fans turn on. Always on 30% custom fan curve: GPU stays between 25-28C Of course, the custom fan curve provides better gaming temps as well (zero RPM goes up to 60C before fans turn on again, while always on fans keep the GPU running at 40-45C in normal games, 53-56C in intense heavy workload games). But my issue is with the card VRMs, you can't tell what their temp is with zero RPM, and the GPU ignores their temp. In terms of VRMs I have a low end model (Gainward Phantom 4090) and I'm not sure if zero RPM would cause the VRMs to wear out faster or not. Any thoughts?

-

4090 production is being throttled until the rtx 30 series overstock sells out.

I have the choice of either going with the Asus TUF (non OC) or MSI Gaming Trio (non OC). The difference is that the Asus TUF is about 100 euro more expensive, but is in stock. The MSI Gaming Trio is not in stock, never saw it in stock. I'd like to know your opinions on the two companies, and which GPU do you recommend? Do you have any of the two GPUs? Should I risk waiting for the Gaming Trio to be in stock and save 100e, or go ahead with the Asus TUF and be sure I'd get my order?

Asus TUF has no Inductor, Capacitor, Memory controller and very bad memory cooling (no heat spreader for memory). Is this an issue for customers? Will the cards fail faster because of this design choice?

Title. I want to compare it to a 4090 Suprim X.

Have you tried reinstalling your windows?

Wobbly fans are a known thing and reviewers were sent samples with the same wobbly fans on their 4090s. It's very likely Nvidia will just tell you it's normal or it's not a problem.

Isn't it quite unfair and biased to compare an upcoming product's release MSRP with the MSRP of a 2 year old product? Looks pretty convenient to me. If I'm to compare fairly, I'm comparing the release MSRP of the previous flagship at the time of it's release with the MSRP of the new flagship at the time of it's release. To that end I would like to compare such MSRP as it is in the EU. That is 2000€ vs 2000€, I would additionally like to add to this that currently an RTX 3090 Ti tuf goes for 1417€, this is not open for debate. This is the price in my country, since I cannot purchase from other countries, other prices become irrelevant. At an MSRP of equal pricing, 2000€ vs 2000€, the 4090 provides between 50 to 70% greater raster performance, between 200 to 400% greater Ray Tracing performance, and up to 500% greater overall performance when DLSS 3 is used. Now, these examples are as follows: 50 to 70% greater raster taken from Nvidia's charts on the reveal day. 200 to 400% greater Ray Tracing performance taken from Nvidia's charts on the reveal day. Up to 500% greater overall performance when DLSS 3 is used taken from Nvidia's charts on the reveal day plus Digital Foundry's own observations and benchmarks. Those are the uplifts Nvidia promised for the same price, those uplifts also come at the same wattage, 450W. This is a monstrous uplift in performance at the same price. Now we can compare it further, against the current 3090 ti value of 1417€ vs 2000€. The 4090 is approximately 41.144% more expensive, while providing between 50-70% greater raster performance, between 2 to 4 times greater Ray Tracing performance, and up to 500% greater overall performance when DLSS 3 is used. That's not a deal? I have a different idea for you. What if 4090 was initially considered to be a 2500$ GPU, with the 4080 16G being much weaker, but being a 749$ GPU? Nevertheless, Nvidia's strategy is crystal clear, yet people barely talk about it. The reason the 4090 is at 2000€ is so that enthusiasts and professionals will use it, the reason the 4080 is 1500€ and the 4070 is 1100€ is because they're not meant to be bought, they're intended to encourage people to buy the 3000 series GPUs which are in an oversupply and Nvidia will support two generations of GPUs for about one year. Thank you, and goodbye.

If I have to watch 5 ads before watching my video, I'm not watching at all to begin with. I'll just close the app and do something else.

Not very bright I see. His point was that MSRP for EU is 2000€ while you kept talking about the US. EU has import taxes, and the MSRP ends up at 1999€.

I for one enjoyed those leaks thoroughly. I'm looking forward to playing GTA 6, and have nothing against the devs. NPCs obviously look like robots considering that...wait for it... THEY'RE NOT TEXTURED. Probably because it's still in development! Only thing sad about the leaks is how long we'll have to wait until we can enjoy the new GTA.

4090 is rated at 450W power draw. Higher requires custom BIOS.