virty99

probably not. pure compute performance is on par with a 1080ti which would be enough for rasterized max settings but it doesnt handle rtx spectacularly. considering that the first cyberpunk demo was run on a 2080ti and was reportedly not stable at 60 fps despite using dlss 2.0 to upscale from 540p, it may be too demanding for anything less than the 2080ti even if they can optimize the game a lot between then and release. i got a great deal on a 2080 super yesterday but i dont think ill stick with it as i also would like to play CP2077 with fancy settings and i dont expect it to be enough. i'd be upscaling from 720p to 1440p though so maybe 540p render is feasible. we wont know until rtx benchmarks come out, all we know is that the recommended settings at 1080p for rasterization are very optimized and accessible

Nothing is ever future-proof. Especially not a first gen consumer technology like ray tracing 

I'm a big fan of using what I LIKE graphically.
So.. RTX in combination with RTX is intensive..
Like Global luminance and Reflections...together or as singles.
 
You will have to pick n choose your priorirty RTX features u want to enable. Esp if DLSS isnt cuting it.

It can bairly do that as of now, at least without dlss.

is this thread a joke?

it's literally asking to predict the future

never seen that one before, maybe it was just renamed or i overlooked it.
but in general i've heard people saying that playing with it off is often better than playing with it on

vsync would not do that. 

does vsync not try to sync the fps with your monitor's refreshrate?
or did i misunderstand how it works,  because similar things happened to me when i used vsync

try turning vsync off.

Try heading over to the Nvidia Control Panel and under manage 3d settings, change the power management mode to maximum performance

could just be me when i used vsync then

It can lower preformance, but he said drops, and vsync would be steady. I lost like 5-10 frames on most games when I turned on vsync, not like 30.