VinZarHP

Yea its fine to test it. It has over current protection, so worst case it will just shut it all off.

You're looking at 200-250w when gaming, under 100w in windows, watching youtube etc ...add 50w for crappy efficiency of psu (if psu gives 300w to components with 80% eff. it means it will take 300w x 100/80 = 375w from mains cable)
Monitor... maybe 40-60w
 
Yeah, a 650va ups should be fine, but it's not 100% guaranteed... it depends if the ups is pure sine wave or simulated sine wave (simulated sine wave upses make the psu work harder and some psus don't like it too much), how fast the up switching to battery and how good the psu is (the psu in theory should stay up for at least 1/60 Hz - ~16ms - with no ac input, but some power supplies cheap out on input "buffer" and may only stay up for 10+ ms ... i the ups can't switch to battery input within that ms time frame you may find the pc just resetting or shutting down.
 

This is your third post about this and people keep recommending you getting a b450 board and you keep asking the same question. I'm not sure why you are expecting a different answer. Don't get a a320 motherboard, unless you want to use it with an athlon ir a ryzen 3 1200. For anything more powerful, get a b450 board. And no matter how many times you ask, you'll get the same answer.

None. Go for a b450 board instead.

Whatever you do, don't get an A320, get at least a B450. An A320 only supports Zen2 chips with integrated graphics, that is the 3200G and 3400G. That's it.
Edit: additionally most if not all A320 boards have bad VRM's so don't expect to run any remotely high power cpu, I don't think those can even handle a 2600 at it's maximum

😮 Ohh ur right, i did a lil research on the 3300x, and it surprisingly surpasses the 3500x and costing less. Thanks so much ❤️

asrock pro 4

no, I wouldn't recommend an a320 board with a 6 core cpu in any case.

don't
3300X + B450 would be a much better option.