Jump to content

Yujah

Member
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Yujah

  1. According to the sheet your folding name is "silverydell". Both it and "Reagan1998" are not found at https://stats.foldingathome.org/donors
  2. Looking good from here now; 8144 participants total both Week 1 and Week 2, and apparently 3681 eventually qualifying ones. Found myself on all 3 sheets...
  3. The "Full Folding Data and Ranks" sheet seems to have some issues. The "Daily Stats Week 1" sheet hasn't anyone alphabetically past "2192 elfensky", the "Dailty Stats Week 2" one not past "3192 InvaderLin" --- and the "Final Summary" one has only 3681 rows, which may or may not be an issue; I suppose it could be the case that more did not end up qualifying. Those first two seem a problem though, assuming it's not just me / my system.
  4. Definitely fair enough in principle but I noticed earlier you were having an health issue. If handling 700 messages is the kind of chore it sounds like I would perhaps in this specific case suggest that anyone who'd not be comfortable sharing an email address should feel free to not claim. But, well, clearly up to you...
  5. By the way, I'm not sure you would need ideas from someone with no idea how you guys are set up, automation-wise, but handling 700 messages manually sounds like madness. For the initial event-signup you had a "Folding name / Forum name" form up that fed into a database / spreadsheet. If you'd now have winners signup similarly with "Either name / email address" upon seeing themselves in your announcement post, mailing out e.g. keys could probably be automated. As said, not sure that's useful to say/suggest, but just in case...
  6. Would have expected that to be referred to as PM rather than DM --- but thanks.
  7. Just so as for me to be able to follow this discussion, would someone be willing to specify what "to dm" is/entails?
  8. I was about to say it likely that you'd pass me again tomorrow if you'd get down to it but you seem to currently have 2M- points with 98 WUs vs. 3M+ for me with 80, both as per the EOC statistics. If you didn't just happen to get a lot more CPU rather than GPU WUs than me this seems to say you're on even less impressive hardware than I am. I have my [rgb=rainbow]gaming rig[/rgb] deployed; am however rather explicitly not a gamer, so, yes, well, what's one to do. You may be up for a hardware upgrade though?
  9. Yay. Now definitively busted into the Top 2000 (we all get to have our own little victories...)
  10. This blog for now doesn't seem to be going places certainly...
  11. Right. So returning to the original question/suggestion, would you feel this a good idea to add to the daily report sheet
  12. I'm still missing the idea it seems. Are you saying that indeed you will add the "total days active" column, or are you saying that it already IS trivially available from the sheet? Because latter I'm not seeing: the sheet only mentions today's points and the week total; I don't see how I could distill days-active from that --- unless you mean I'd manually run a test over each day's sheet and add.
  13. If I get what you're saying then whether or not the current day counts is (i.e., "Todays points" unequal 0) is already but not a running total of active days over the event, right?
  14. In that context, and only if it's trivial to do, anther column with "days active during the event" could potentially be semi-useful. In the sense of the WU shortage and more directly the stats-delay I've been on at least two days uncertain whether or not that day would register as "active". And on the other hand; if basically 100% is active all days or conversely, the stats-delay in fact means that number would often be wrong, then maybe it's not useful or a good idea to show it. Thought I'd mention it in any case. As said, even if considered a good addition, certainly only if it's trivial to add...
  15. Note; while I'll readily admit it was hardly a screamer, I was joking...
  16. The practical thing to do would probably be to reserve Steam keys for FPS games for top-N folders and hand out keys for story-driven adventures to us casual gamers folders...
  17. Yesterday it seemed F@h got the stats back up; all was updating for me at least. This after points indeed not updating for at least a day before that (at the F@h state page; they did at EOC). Currently I've had at least two WUs again that haven't registered for hours, and this time including at EOC.
  18. Ah, yes, should've specified "in the 5000/6000 series"; shall edit. An HD 7970 is GCN so would indeed work.
  19. [ Context: an AMD HD 6950 failing WUs, on Windows 10 Pro ] Thanks for the reply. I'd been commenting on/documenting the folding-usefulness of old Radeon 50000/6000 series cards (mostly due to having a fair number of those still lying about myself) with the answer basically being HD 5830+ and HD 6930+ (i.e., double precision support). In my case the focus is Linux and I guess your result doesn't necessarily mean the same would happen on Linux but, well, I'll admit that I'd have given it better change to work on Windows 10 even if didn't on Linux than the other way around. If anyone here's folding with a HD 5830+ or HD 6930+ from the 5000 or 6000 series (7000 series is expected to work) a shoutout would be appreciated, but I'll for now note potential issues with 6950 at least....
  20. OK.... so two days ago I complain here about not getting WUs just to land one 5 minutes after doing so, and today I post I'm back-to-backing them for the last two days and fail to retrieve one exactly when the at the time of posting current one finishes. Could whomever of you guys and gals has his or her finger on the "Yujah" on/off button press it once more, please? Just once, not twice....
  21. Well, not so sure about that. This one was about getting WUs faster rather than having them longer; minimizing idle time; not maximizing crunching time... Yes, I know "not getting any" sucks; was in that same boat two days ago; couldn't get past the 10 WUs so as to qualify for the QRB even. But the pace has significantly picked up for me since then...
×