Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

alvinleetya

Member
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by alvinleetya

  1. thanks for your reply. I'm fairly new to overclocking so not very much knowledgeable. If I understood correctly, graphics cards manufacturer provide different versions of a same GPU , with different coolers, video output support ... Gigabyte for instance apply by default a certain overclock to their cards. Looking at their website, the model I have (https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-N207SWF3OC-8GD#kf) is supposed to be running at 1785 MHz core clock. However the Aorus model (https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-N207SAORUS-8GC#kf) is supposed to run at 1905 MHz core clock. Is it possible they just apply the wrong (better) OC to the card I have ? And anyway it shouldn't make any difference since I pushed it higher and could have reached the same results with the same card at 1785 MHz default core clock ? Also adding my detailed specs: CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700x with stock cooler RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX 16Go (2x8Go) DDR4 3000MHz MB: Asus rog strix b450-f gaming
  2. Hi, So I have recently purchased a RTX 2070 Super (the Gigabyte Windforce OC 3X 8G - GV-N207SWF3OC-8GD model) and used MSI Afterburner to overclock it. I didn't really find somewhere a comprehensive forum that compares OC results for this card but I have found some user reports here and there and I am a little bit surprised with my results (in a good way). When I look at the clock speed during a game (Shadow of the Tomb Raider for instance) or run a benchmark I have the following results: Running at stock speed without any overclock I reach and cruise at 1905 MHz --> That seems pretty higher that what I have seen from other users With an overclock I can reach a cruise clock speed of 2130 MHz . This is with a core clock of +140 and memory clock of +900 . I can push it a bit more while still being stable but I noticed that my core clock speed won't increase above 2130 MHz Again, this seems a bit higher than what I've seen from other users. Anyone on this forum have had similar results or would know whay there seems to be some big differences ? Thanks,
×