Jump to content

INDIANAJUNE2

Member
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by INDIANAJUNE2

  1. Hey all . Didn’t have the luxury of this problem before but I got a 3080 some while back, and on some games (like ghost runner I’m playing now) it will go over my monitors max refresh rate in cut scenes and some instances in games causing tearing not to bad but still. I have established a Gsync is running by the indicator, and I’ve tried capping the fps in control panel but neither seem to be working. Was hoping one of you had an explanation. I have a 4K 144hz Gsync compatible monitor and a 144 hz 2k Gsync monitor. Thanks for any help!
  2. hey guys , having an issue where windows identifies my back up display as monitor #1 i guess becuse i had that first. this is an issue becuse my Logitech g560 speakers screen sample the wrong screen, same with nvidia broadcast and other such apps. driving me nuts! any help would be greatly appreciated!
  3. Hey guys , I’ve had the LGGN950-B for about a month now working fine and then today I got a razer huntsman elite and got this problem. These posts are from 2019 so this is crazy ! Anybody find a fix !?
  4. Hey all, hopping somebody has some idea what’s up I can’t find anything like it on the internet. So I’ve had my pc for a good while now and I’ve noticed for a long time that when I’m trying to plug in a usb on the I/O my Monitor will blink black screen sometimes, I chalked it up to some Electrical interference didn’t thinelectrical interference I wasn’t too worried about it but last night my headphones get robotic and garbled sometimes and the only way to fix it is to unplug and re-plug the USB and I know that’s why I was trying to get it in the port the RGB on my 3 GPU fans turned all off but one then back on. I was able to recreate it to. So I guess the blinks on my monitor is the graphics card not the monitor. This ring any bells for anyone ? Not even sure how to go about this
  5. My card seems to need the voltage. I almost wonder if it’s not boosting properly. I have a friend with the exact same card who overclock scanner gave him a +65 core clock, it told me 0+ as in it can’t be overclocked. He can run at least +65 in OCCT 3-D test with out errors but he’s will get to around 80c I can’t go over +25 core clock at 2010-2020mhz with out errors but never breach 59c even in OCCT. Now if I go into the Voltage curve and pick out a spot , say 1.050v And raise it up to 2070mhz and hit apply I will get no errors in OCCT and run at that speed consistently in game with no change in temperature. That a pretty big deference How I fell down this rabbit hole
  6. Again I understand that. And I know nobody can guarantee anything to me. But there’s a big difference of it would’ve lasted seven years and now it only last five , then it would have lasted five years and now it’s only gonna last one. Even though I’m not going over 60c no mater what I guess I’ll probably keep it at Frequency curve of 1.050 at 2070mhz because I know it stays there stock so it’s might as well be the same I’m just telling it to run faster. I can start going up to 2100 at 1.070 ish at no temperature change but If it’s that much of a risk why bother.
  7. When you have experienced degradation with voltage for you running it at and for how long ? I understand nobody can give me a guarantee I understand nobody can give me a guarantee I’m just looking for general consensus of what should be safe enough. I guess a better way to put it is I’m trying not to run it at a point or I’m guaranteed to only get one year out of it. That Probably would’ve been a better way to phrase it
  8. Oh yeah , I got you. I just said it like that because from what I understood anywhere near damaging was supposed to be locked in the bios anyway. I’m new enough not to be sure if that includes the voltage frequency curve though. Perhaps I’m telling her to do something unacceptable like run at acceptable voltage is but for too long or some thing I don’t know
  9. Well, stock I’m getting what was advertised. But when over clocking people with the next card in line down and $150 cheaper then me are getting better performance before I go into the frequency curve. Was there an overclocking section here ? Or your saying on like overclocker.net or whatever ? I didn’t see if here but yeah you’re probably right I should move itI didn’t see if here but yeah you’re probably right I should move it
  10. I understand that, I do. Maybe max safe wasn’t the best way to word it. Maybe I should have said “what do most people have the best luck with within normal parameters of overclocking “ or something. I’m ok with shaving some life off but if I’m doing anything cringe worthy I wanna know
  11. See this is what I originally thought but there’s so much mixed information out there i’ve even seen forum post saying that’s not the case. Way I thought it was is: you can kill it if The voltage is high enough no matter the temps but turning cards are locked conservatively in the bios and won’t allow you to go anywhere near that high. I also thought boost 4.0 Would down clock me no matter what I told it to do in the voltage frequency curve if it was dangerous , but I could still shave some lifespan off which I don’t want to do. Want to get at least 3-4 years out of it. Right now with 1.068v being the highest I’ve tried at 2100mhz I don’t breach 59c.
  12. I understand that logic, but overclcoking is a fairly normal thing these days. I don’t think I’m doing anything that extreme. Why I’m trying to find out we’re “ extreme “ is
  13. The most I can get before OCCT errors with sliders maxed not going into the voltage curve is +25core and + 800memory that runs at 2020-2010mhz at around 1.050v with spikes as high as 1.074 I have seen with voltage % at a 100. I can get a constant 2070mhz at 1.050v in the curve or around 2100mhz at 1.068v . It’s weird increasing the voltage slider on my card won’t change anything from stock. I still have to tell it
  14. Well even that confuses me cause I’ll hit a Consistent 1.050v and graphically intense games that spikes to 1.068 at times stock ( no sliders ) so does that mean it’s safe to run it at 1.068v constantly for 2100mhz to get at least 3 years out of it ? There’s people that I’ve overclock their 900 series and Pascale cards that are still working OK . I understand there is some risk but I’m looking for that sweet spot . I’ve heard people say a lot that voltage is locked conservatively in the bios that it’s fine to max out the voltage slider but idk if that Plies to changing the curve
  15. I have seen a lot of posts saying pascal was 1.094v but not much on Turing. I also saw somebody say on here nvida is on the record saying anything under 1.064v I haven’t been able to confirm that. I also saw Nvidia say on a game or nexus interview turning the voltage slider up to 100% could reduce lifespan to one year but I hope that’s just them covering their butt. Some of you may recognize me from my other posts but a quick recap: I have an aorus 2070 super. I didn’t have the luck I had hoped manually overclocking with offsets, I can get +25 core at 2010mhz and +800memory before I start to get errors on OCCT 3D test. I found better results using the voltage frequency curve. My card runs mostly 1.050 stock and there I can turn it to 2070mhz and +800memory and not really worry sense that is what it does normally. However I can get up to 2100mhz at about 1.068v , and Maybe more but I stop there until I found out what safe long-term voltage is. I understand this varies card to card and model to model but I was looking for a general safe consensus. I also don’t get errors in OCCT when I use the curve this way , not really sure why but I think it has to do with I hit power limits instantly in that test which drops the voltage no matter what down to around 900 making higher clocks unstable. I guess when I only changed one point on the voltage frequency curve if I can’t do that it just goes back to what it normally does, but I’m no expert maybe you’ll know ? It may be worth mentioning to that one of the selling points if this car was “ Built for Extreme Overclocking 12+2 Power Phases” As opposed to nvidia 8+2. What is this really has any effect on lifespan at high voltage is I don’t know. Thank you for any help in advance !
  16. It actually did this when I first bought it and gigabyte and intel said it was normal and just leave set to high performance in power management even though I don’t think so. It just resolved its self and ran at 4.6 all the time in game. I’m realizing now that one thing I did do was update the bios. I did it again when I overclocked so maybe that why. In the description it says “ fixed cpu Vcore and power behavior “ maybe in my case it did the opposite? I did post this to a gigabyte subreddit and the person that responded said he didn’t have this problem on either so idk. I Have all the Major monitoring apps major monitoring apps, core temp , cpuz, ect but I was just using after burner in game and in beachmark when I see the clock speed drop just because it’s in the corner in full screen. Thanks for your help btw
  17. Hey guys , it’s not really an issue as much as I just want to know why !? So, in game or in bench mark like time spy my 9700k will down clock to stock speeds and 1.2ghz a lot and even as low as the energy saver speed of 800mhz. However in the cpu portion of time spy or if you run a cpu only benchmark like intel diagnostic tool it will run at 5ghz the whole time, so it must think it’s not needed and down clock unless usage is high enough ? This can be fixed by going into windows and turning power management from balanced to high performance so it’s not the end of the world , because I think that’s fine to do ( new to all this ) but my seven700 K never had this behavior so it’s bothering me lol. Any ideas ??? I should note that it did this when I first bought it and then I believe stopped so maybe it’s a bios update or something. The cpu is overcloked to 5ghz with a voltage of 3.500v, and avx offset of 0 , and an LLC of medium. Temperature never breaches 75 and it usually in the 50’s under load.
  18. Ran regular OCCT test over night for 8hours , no errors and a max temp of 75c
  19. Yeah , I ran OCCT for about 10 minutes and then prime 95 for about 30-40 minutes. After about ten minuets into the test it hit a point we’re temps spiked into the 80s for about 2-4 minutes and then went back down. Same again prob 10 minutes after. I think there’s like a peak point in the test. The max did raise by a Celsius or so each cycle so yeah, I prob wanna test it over night. Do you know if temps get too high if prime 95 shuts off ?
  20. You were so good about helping me I thought you might like to know, and was hoping to get one last opinion: That I was able to get stable at 5ghz all cores with a voltage of 1.350 ( I think last time I may have used 1.305v ) or it’s possible I’m stable Because I turned LCC from turbo to medium like you said. Also my avx offset is 0 and all speed states / power settings are on. After 10mins off OCCT there was no errors and temps reaching 60c ,and also no errors in prime 95 but after about 15 minutes temps did spike to the highest of 87c in core #2 and the other cores maxing in 80’s but nothing as high but not for very long and Average temps throughout the test were low 60c’s. I’m ready to call this a win and pack it in. With out trying again with lower voltages ( since I’ve been doing this for 3 days ) if we’re in agreement 1.350v should hurt anything overtime ? Again you been great thanks for all your help.
  21. Or no maybe stock was auto. I made a stock profile so I can switch back
  22. Thanks for the help, really. I’m going to watch the video. Real quick what would you set the LLC to ? High or lower ? Think stock is medium Thanks stock is medium
  23. Thanks for such a detailed answer ! Sorry , I am extremely new to overclocking. The guide did have me set my “ load line calibration “ to turbo, is that what you mean ? Also how higher would you raise the voltage each time ? I was thinking maybe go up by twos like 00.02v each time ? Reason I ask is I’m trying to save myself a lot of rinse and repeat with the blue screens if that’s too small and increment
×