Jump to content

j2ee

Member
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. for single core, intel is 5% higher: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9600KF-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600/m772658vs4040
  2. software incompatibilities is a big issue and everyone knows it, you don't need to pretend you don't know.
  3. and AMD has more trouble stuff than Intel, going to waste a lot of times or even money to resolve trouble stuff.
  4. You said you serve multiple clients at the same time, that is not "most of the users", just like "most of the users" would not open 20 vm to do stuff for clients.
  5. I have read the explanation and it is true that most of the users would not really use anything more than 6 or 8 cores... yeah you can buy like 12 threads amd with pretty cheap price now, but how do you even use that many threads except you do your own programming research, 3D design....
  6. https://www.userbenchmark.com/page/about Who we are We are an independent team of scientists and engineers. We do not have time for HR, PR or marketing (this page is it).
  7. https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/ sort by value% All top 4 are intel cpus
  8. I come to here to hear some non technical pure casual gamers point of view.
  9. I just read this and don't think this ranking site has any issue:
  10. People in this forum are not that technical, try overclock.net
  11. I think around 85% people use Nidvia but not AMD for a good reason...and 1650 is newer then it would have longer support
  12. https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/ sort by value%, 1650 is still the best 5 top value.
×