Jump to content

ibrahim665

Member
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ibrahim665

  1. This based on my experience with several distros

    Ubuntu is fast, has best hardware support and easy installer.

    Debian is stable, but does not have very best hardware support.

    Arch linux lets you install what you want but the installation procedure is somewhat complex.

    Fedora is the test field for redhat linux

    Manjaro and Anterjos are based on Arch Linux , installation is easy and they are fancy

    Last But not the least you can try scientific linux which I haven't used. 

  2. I switch between distors a lot

    I don't have a constant daily driver

    I haven't used debian before so decided to install it in my laptop with LXQT desktop(which i got to know is not simple at all)

    Now I am having weird backlight issues

    The brightness is always set to full

    And Instead of lowering the brightness of the backlight it seems to be changing the color of every thing in the display to mimick low brightness

    Which I noticed when I set the brightness lowest and there seems to be a lot of backlight seeping

     

  3. 15 hours ago, Chunchunmaru_ said:

    Just following the gentoo documentation isn't a bad idea tbh, it's not that difficult once you know what is needed
     
    What was the problem? 

    I am good with linux from scratch for now 

    viewed youtube tutorials but they were outdated and my installation was not going in the same direction a it did on youtube 

    and the gentoo documentation is a mess I couldn't understand a single thing

     

    Gentoo gave me one hell of a headache by just viewing its manuals

    I could have made another LFS base system with Xorg and wireless network capabilities instead of wasting my entire evening yesterday

  4. 45 minutes ago, Sauron said:

    Don't. That's not what it's intended for. You get a minimal system that only does the basics so you can learn how a Linux system is typically built. You don't get something you can use effectively out of the box.

     

    The architecture you want is probably skylake-avx512 but, as @Chunchunmaru_ pointed out, you can just use "native" to use whatever the compiler thinks is appropriate for your cpu.

    I Know that LFS gives only minimal system, but I had Xfce running on the base system and I had built LFS so many times that I know the underlying basics of a Linux system can compile it with ease. Also  I don't want to hand over my pc to systemd. I prefer Xfce the most and want to have absolute control over my system.

  5. I would like to know about gcc 9.1.0 compilers compatibility with intel processors?

    The matter is that I want use Linux From Scratch as a daily driver.

    I have 7th gen Intel core i5 processor 7200U in my laptop whose code name is kabylake.

    When compiling the last version of Linux From Scratch I used to pass CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=skylake" to the compiler because there was no kabylake support in the gcc compiler.

    Now I am making the newer version of LFS for my system and I have switched over to gcc-9.1.0 compiler and expected that -march=kabylake support would be there.

     

    When I did that the compiler reported

     

    gcc -Wall -Winline -O2 -pipe -march=kabylake -g -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c blocksort.c

    cc1: error: bad value ('kabylake') for '-march=' switch

    cc1: note: valid arguments to '-march=' switch are: nocona core2 nehalem corei7 westmere sandybridge corei7-avx ivybridge core-avx-i haswell core-avx2 broadwell skylake skylake-avx512 cannonlake icelake-client icelake-server cascadelake bonnell atom silvermont slm goldmont goldmont-plus tremont knl knm x86-64 eden-x2 nano nano-1000 nano-2000 nano-3000 nano-x2 eden-x4 nano-x4 k8 k8-sse3 opteron opteron-sse3 athlon64 athlon64-sse3 athlon-fx amdfam10 barcelona bdver1 bdver2 bdver3 bdver4 znver1 znver2 btver1 btver2 native

     

    But then I noticed there is canonlake listed above which is  10-nanometer die shrink of the Kaby Lake microarchitecture (ref wikipedia)

    And My Question is

    Can I pass -march=canonlake to gcc-9.1.0 compiler

    Would my processor support the binaries or is there any better switch for my processor

×