veikko315

What temps are you seeing in R20?

What were the temp deltas throwing those noctua industrials on the AIO

Why

Yeah another thing other people have mentioned I straight up would not buy that monitor for what you're doing with 10900k / 3080 it's a total waste. Go at least 1440p or 1440p ultrawide to get the most out of that hardware. A 3080 / 10900 laugh at 1080p 144hz in all but the absolute most pathetically optimized games. Personally I would save up a little more for a 1440p ultrawide 144hz unit it will be a night and day difference and you're already spending a couple grand on a pc, 300 more for a good monitor is more than worth it.

I don't think the newest iteration of Ryzen is going to outdate your PC. People put way too much weight in a 5-10% performance difference. It's really negligible. The only people that would really be impacted by that sort of difference are not using consumer equipment anyways. Unless you start spending a lot more money to get the higher tier Ryzen CPU's which is not really a valid comparison anyways at that point. But I'm sure a horde of Ryzen-drones are going to show up to tell me how wrong I am. Just build what you like and enjoy it.

I have a Mesify C with a 9900k @ 5ghz ~230W that loves to run at like 85C under load with a DRP4 (~1.38V) and a 980Ti space heater pulling like 300w and a bunch of HDD's and shit in it probably over 600W in heat being dissipated in it and it handles it great with 2 fans at the front and 2 at the top and one exhaust. It's a beautiful case too and very well made and the cable management is awesome.

Again is this mission critical equipment that will be involved in working on a patient in any way or is it just for analyzing data after the fact.. If its going to be involved in the safety of patients in any way and you're asking about it on the internet you're way out of your wheelhouse and should defer this job, otherwise if its just for basic analysis then I would keep it as simple as possible maybe even something like a simple automatic HDMI / KVM switch. Buy two for when it fails and you need to swap it out quickly.

Surely this is not mission critical equipment we are talking about here that could potentially endanger a patient that you are asking strangers on the internet about right? If it is then I wouldnt touch this with a 100 mile pole for liability reasons all the sudden a surgeon loses video feed while inserting a catheter and its your fault for using obs studio or some dumb shit.. Otherwise keep it simple and offline like a tv or monitors with pip you dont want to have these things set up as vms with personal data for your patients on them too easy to exploit

Anthony video about the best way to remotely access VM's running off a networked PC

Cut the crap, neither you or I are capable of anything that approaches objectivity. Don't be so naive. You are by definition subjective in everything you do. Also, I disagree. We are talking about gaming here, and I don't think you're being honest if you claim AMD beats out Intel in high end or even mid range gaming CPU's. 9600k basically dominates mid range in gaming and the 9700k/9900k has no answer from AMD with respect to gaming.

I have edited my post to reflect what I have learned based on analyzing your criticism and reflecting on my views.

Pearls before swine, love. Unless of course, you are referring to yourself.

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt in providing an article the has bias towards workstation loads as evidenced by threadrippers position near the top, and the fact that you're completely ignoring overclocking. However, in my attempts to prove that you are a fool, I discovered that indeed things are not as cut and dry as I had assumed, and in some cases AMD provides better price to performance value over Intel, although they seem unable to dethrone Intel from the top of CPU performance as of right now. Let me share with you what I have found. Unfortunately I don't have much time to compile more as I have a bunch of stuff I am working on at the moment but rest assured I have seen the error of my ways. Its looking more like the question of Intel vs AMD is very complicated and making general statements is not the right course of action. AMD is right up there with intel in price per performance for lower end CPU's (like the one I use) but simply has no answer for higher end CPU's, and the 9600k stands out as exceptional price to performance beating out even the 3900x at around half the price. AMD also has no real answer to the 9700k/9900k at the high end as well. I stand corrected, again. I will edit my posts to reflect this.

Intel is still way better than AMD for gaming, in every price range except lower end.

You're right, I stand corrected. It looks like AMD fixed that with the 3000 series. I'll edit it out of my post. Although I still think Intel provides better performance per dollar in that price range for most games.