lansing

The quality in PS4 is lower than the lowest setting in the PC version

I have a batch of scanned tiff file with resolution around 5990 x 7600, and when I viewed them at 100% with my 144 Hz LG 27GL83A-B monitor, I'm getting flicker. This problem doesn't occur when I switch to 120 Hz or when I zoomed out. After more testing, I narrowed down the problem to that the flicker only occurs when the image being displayed exceeded a certain width on the screen. Like this: There is no flickering with the width of the image viewer here, but anything longer than that it will flicker. I'm also suspecting the problem to be cause by the screening pattern on my image, because if I remove the screen, the flicker goes away.

Oh you're right, the 144 Hz option is in the Nvidia control panel

I did turned off adaptive sync, but it's still showing 100 Hz.

I tried a couple solutions I found, either I need to turned off adaptive sync when connecting with an HDMI cable, or connect the monitor through display port. The latter one resolved it but don't know why the first one doesn't.

I have brought this LG 27GL83A-B monitor last week, however when I check on the setting, it is only running at 100 Hz instead of 144 as advertised. What is wrong?

There is no reason to not go with the 4K one if you don't game a lot.

There is this video of the PC version of the game where the uploader hacked away all the logo animation and it turned out only taking 15 seconds to get into the main menu, with his SSD transferring at 390 MB/s max. So it's relatively safe to say now that all those logo animations on all the platforms were just there for displaying purpose, not to buy time for data loading.

So the startup should be very fast and the reason that it took like 50 seconds was because they want to show all the developer logos?

But that would not make sense if the player had like 10 saves from different locations. It doesn't make sense to load textures for all of them when the player is only going to load into one save.

I was watching this video about load time comparison on Assassin's Creed Valhalla and the load time from game startup to the main menu was significantly longer than loading into a save from the main menu. The latter only took 16 second while the former took more than 50 seconds. Does the game startup actually require more data load than loading into a save file?

Well I guess I'll wait for Black Friday. I hope they drops to $250 for some good one.

$500 is out of my budget, I don't need the best. I only need a good one with reasonable price, like under $300.

I do color grading stuff and am getting a PS5 in the near future, so I'm looking for a monitor that has the IPS feature as well as high refresh rate for gaming, like this one. Right now it's sitting at about $300, will there going to be a price drop or should I just pull the trigger right now?

I have a 3900x with a Fractal Design Celsius S36 and it's running at 87.5C on max load, so I think you're fine.

Cable problem? Have you tested any other HDMI cable or even DVI if you have one?

Don't buy the crippled 3GB version

If you're a software developer, they'll probably give it to you if you ask them. NeatVideo has had their testing article on 3080 up on Sept 3rd, so they probably got it by Sept 1st.

I got confused with the label, while that green port looks like an headphone jack, but the label is saying that it's audio-in... I don't want the PS4 sound to go through my computer because it sure will have static and delay. What are those red and white plug on my subwoofer? Can I connect my PS4 or monitor straight there?

I have a PC and a PS4, both are connected to a monitor, PC is connected through DVI port and PS4 through HDMI. The PC is connected to a sub-woofer for sound. Now I want my speakers to also work with my PS4. My speaker is Logitech Z323, it has a auxiliary input. My monitor is Asus VH424H, it has an audio input. Right now my PS4 sound is coming out from the monitor through HDMI. How do I rearrange them so both my PC and PS4 can use my speakers?

They are the same price for half a year already

I just checked the manual on their most expensive $650 x570 board, it is also using Asmedia on 2 of its 6 sata ports.

The manual said that sata1 and sata2 ports are from ASMedia ASM1061, and sata3 - sata6 are from AMD x570 chipset. A google search said that the ASMedia one sucks, why would MSI cheap it out like that?

I'm using the MSI x570 A-Pro motherboard and I just installed a brand new WD blue 1TB ssd. The ssd spec is 560MB/s read and 530MB/s write. But on my benchmark, I'm getting sub-par speed at 360MB - 406MB. At first I thought that the drive was faulty. But then when I connected the drive to another sata port, I'm getting the advertised speed. See the red cable in the image. connecting to the bottom sata port give me slow speed connecting to the top port became normal again What is the problem?

I have 3 HDD in my PC right next to me, one being a 7 year old HGST model and one being 8TB Seagate installed last week, and the only time I hear a sound from them is when they wake up from sleep mode.