Jump to content

MS-DOS Guy

Member
  • Posts

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MS-DOS Guy

  1. I still haven't activated windows and I've had windows 10 for years... still don't plan to lol
  2. In my menu, I have a "#" symbol which moves absolute to the CursorPosition(xcoord, ycoord). Depending on the case switch ( e.g uparrow or downarrow key ) the xcoord will move. The ycoord is a constant, since this is a menu and not a player moving on a map within a game for instance it is not necessary. Now, xcoord decrements by 10 when the uparrow is activated and increments by 10 units when the down arrow is activated. However, I have to make a system that detects when the xcoord is at a certain position since I don't want the user to be able to infinitely go down or up on the buffer screen. I just want them to be able to go a certain amount based on the amount of menu items. Which may be easy to do, what I did was devised a little while loop each time the xcoord is at the top most value of the menu items displayed on the screen or the bottom most. The uparrow is working fine, however the downarrow isn't and I have no idea. I literally just copied and pasted the uparrow while loop to the downarrow case with a few adjustments. I've been trying to fix the problem for ages, pulling out my hair. I am completely lost! I don't even know what to even began to try what to do. I've already googled for a solution to no avail. And I don't want to copy and paste someone elses menu since I would be learning nothing. bool debugmode = false; bool f4 = false; // f4 enables or disables debug mode, by default it is false, when true consquently debug mode is ac- int redo = 0; // filler for the do while loop int ycoord = 30; // x coordinate on the plane coordinate int xcoord = 35; // y coordinate on the plane coordinate ConsoleKeyInfo userinput = new ConsoleKeyInfo(); do { userinput = Console.ReadKey(true); Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); Console.Write("#"); Console.Clear(); switch (userinput.Key) { case ConsoleKey.UpArrow: xcoord = xcoord - 10; while (xcoord < 20) { if (xcoord == 10) { xcoord = 20; } else { xcoord = 20 - 10; } } Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); if (f4 == true || debugmode == true ) { Console.Write("X: " + xcoord + " Y: " + ycoord); Console.Write(Environment.NewLine); } Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); Console.Write("#"); break; case ConsoleKey.DownArrow: xcoord = xcoord + 10; while (xcoord > 60) { if (xcoord == 70) { GoBackTenU(xcoord); } else { xcoord = 60 + 10; } } Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); if (f4 == true || debugmode == true) { Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); Console.WriteLine("X: " + xcoord + " Y: " + ycoord); } Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); Console.Write("#"); break; case ConsoleKey.F4: if (f4 == false) { f4 = true; } else { f4 = false; } Console.SetCursorPosition(ycoord, xcoord); Console.Write("#"); break; } } while (redo == 0); } static int GoBackTenU(int xcoord) { xcoord = 60; return xcoord; }
  3. I see, fair enough. Well you could have explained to me that before. But I understand.
  4. Wasn't necessary to act rude. Kinda uncalled for. Discs are pretty obsolete with streaming online these days so... that was all I was saying. Even if 4K Bluray is superior then streaming services or any other form of media for the most part, its literally already dying. I just don't even see the point in investing money in one. I know its not my place to tell people what to buy, which I'm not, I'm just wondering whats the point if its dying already. I know 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray discs often offer the best video performance and bitrates etc... but those discs will soon all just be on platforms on Netflix or other streaming services etc... albeit with time. Like cmon, we both know its inevitable. And there is nothing wrong with that because streaming services are alot more convenient. Even for people who demand the best picture/sound or whatever.
  5. that would be a big thing for me, but I understand how OP might not prioritize it as he said.
  6. Take this with a grain of salt since I haven't heard the 559s in a while, but I certainly beg to differ. I find the pieces I play on this SHP9500 as I am right now, with really tight treble and mids, really solid performance all while being very, very smooth and some of the best I've heard for the price point. Although I can't speak for the 559s that much, last time I heard them was a year ago in a audio show so... eh I don't know. Honestly whatever is best for OP.
  7. ^^^ probably responsible due to the large nature of the drivers
  8. @Skystalker512 if I may ask, what music do you intend on listening to?
  9. I agree with the bass, but for me that is quite the opposite.
  10. Yeah sure, I'm about to eat breakfast though so I can't respond right now, but I will as soon as I'm finished.
  11. Damn dude, that sucks. I wish you luck and hope you enjoy your headset!
  12. Christ wow, why specifically Ali express?
  13. I will say, my 751 did break, its been a while since I had them, I plan on using my warranty service with it, but I think the MH751/2 might be tighter, it didn't fall off my head as easily as far as I remember. Its just a slight annoyance with the 9500s although. Its nothing bad to the point where you might refuse to buy the headset.
  14. Oh wow, I got them for $70 when they were on sale but where I live they are typically $100.00, also, I edited my post since I forgot a few things at the bottom! But I can assure you won't be disappointed when you get them. I certainly wasn't, I was quite surprised how good they sounded for the price point if anything. I'm really looking forward to how your experience is with whatever headset you choose to get!
  15. 1) Where are you ordering from? o_0 I got mine in 2 days 2) I'm fairly certain when I bought it from Amazon they had a typical 30 day return policy per typical with these things 3) That is not true at all, if anything that is quite the opposite. I am an avid listener to classical music, they have superb high frequencies and mid range frequencies that are simply not even reckoned by any headset under than $150 give or take. This also brings me into your 4th con 4) Although the sound quality is unrivaled by nearly any headset for the price point ( don't just take my anecdotal experience, take the word of many sound enthusiasts and bear in mind these factors are highly dependent on what your listening to. ) the bass does roll off unfortunately however I have experienced absolutely no issues with the treble. If anything the treble is one of the more notable positives of the headset. I will say, though, if you enjoy deep bass you might be disappointed but it isn't THAT bad, but its just like any other headset so to speak. Nothing fancy. And its just another one of the caveats of buying a relatively cheap pair of cans. That is really the only problem with it and the only way I can see this being a really bad negative is if you were a total bass head which is not the case for me thankfully As for the Sennheiser's, I am deeply sorry I can't speak too much about them, the last time I tried them was a while ago, but I can say with utmost certainty that the SHP9500 sounds cleaner in some areas, particularly the high/mids which is most of the sound spectrum anyways, and the most important part to me although that may be subjective. The 559s are excellent pair of cans don't get me wrong, but I would pick the 9500s anyday. Also I forget to mention, but the 9500s are really god damn comfortable, I would say they rival stuff like the MH751s/752s which are quite famous for being the most comfortable headset. I also wish the clamp was a little tighther around your head but having it loose is the reason in particular why its so comfortable. I wish there could be something of a harmonic blend. For instance when I was working on my receiver the other day since a capacitor blew out and I was using my oscilloscope to check for abnormalities and also soldering in a new cap, I had my headset plugged into my cassette deck while working on it, and each time I moved my head from a vertical position otherwise, it would start to fall off. Although it isn't that bad, its a tad annoying and I suppose it kinda depends on how big your head is.
  16. Why even bother getting a dedicated player or a console. If you want to play Bluray, just get a DVD-ROM, or don't and just watch media digitally like the rest of humanity. I didn't know people even still used DVDs o_0 lol
  17. How does this compare to your friend's pc? In particular to GPU demanding games since I don't know the full spec sheet of your friend's pc.
  18. What are the frame rates before, and the frame rates now?
  19. Then once again its probably due to overclocking. That is the underlying cause. You need to increment your voltage until the clock speed you desired is stable. Sometimes a GPU can't push out the desired clock speed regardless of inputted voltage. You need to adjust these sliders to find the happy medium. Your problem is a frequent problem typically resulted in a unstable overclock.
  20. Start at everything stock. Make sure this isn't an overclocking problem and see if the problem still consists. Otherwise, you can start trying to overclock. Simply follow a guide. Always increment values at small values. And typically to get higher clock speeds you need to add voltage. But its really invaluable you look at a guide to overclocking if you haven't before, or really have a good idea of how to do it optimally and efficiently.
  21. Increase voltage until stable. Do in small increments. You'll know when its unstable. Better yet, look at a overclocking guide.
  22. That article is assuming you have already enabled them and it still won't function Just go into the settings and enable them
  23. If they are greyed out, you need to enable them https://rog.asus.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-81916.html#:~:text=Step 6%3A Go into MSI,GPU voltage in the OSD.
  24. Have you touched the voltage multiplier at all?
×