uberas

Was a bad call, now in large games like MFS, forza horizon 5 I have textures pop up. Reminds me of playing gta v on hdd drive.

Did that too..

https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/anonymous/preview/1397/fqYKJJAwCUI
 
posted

I mean .1% lows are pretty bad with 2600, and mainly that’s the reason of my overclocking. Well, whatever I’ll probably swap it for 3600. Thanks for help 

But would that uncore do anything tho? As I said, there’s no difference with auto or 1.35V in idle according to sensors (around 30-33W) and I use Ryzen balanced plan 
 
I was trying not to exceed 1.375V, as some guy on reddit found that’s the limit for hard cpu degradation (like needing more volts to sustain same clocks in 4-6months time). That’s why I’ve put 1.35V (as LLC will obviously go a bit higher to that 1.375V area)
 
Anyways, I don’t need that overclock. Leaving everything on auto is really solid after that cooler change and I have 3775-3825mhz all cores under stress and constant 3900mhz while gaming. Adding that to gtx1650super yields no need for OC whatsoever, was just trying to check what’s my borderline 

That’s why I think some throttling or whatever kicked in? Haven’t checked clockspeed

Zen+ (and original Zen) doesn't have that DRAM:IF decoupling feature, so this behavior doesn't exist. However, instead it just can't run with as fast memory as Zen 2. DDR4-3200 is about as much as you can really count on, beyond that it gets more and more tricky.

I have pulse and it stays around 70-80C. Under full load it’s getting around 78-82C and fan spins up to 70% (my case have 5 fans) so I would say it’s average and you can hear it. However after undervolting it stays around that 78-82C with fan around 50% and keep in mind it’s under 100% load. While gaming 50-70C fan 25-50%

Well, yeah I can hit them 100+ FPS on low/med settings aswell but that doesn’t change anything plus I prefer to play on high/v.high that’s why 75Hz is enough for me 

Oh I didn’t meant any of these, my course is business management, there’s plenty of essay writing or watching stuff. I’ve chosen LG IPS from my post just because I’m annoyed from TN angles and we’ll see

Yup, that’s why I’ve bought 3400MHz XMP ones however if OP wants to overclock he can try - leaving everything on Auto will have worse results but better stability - but if he’s only gaming it doesn’t really matter. I think 1-2h of blend in Prime95 would serve him well then

I don’t know what kind of processor you would have to have to experience such thing, I’ve used USB WiFi adapters all the way down to E8400 and it NEVER affected my cpu usage in a way I would feel it. Now I’m running Ryzen 5 2600 and I can’t imagine it’s 12 threads struggling to manage some WiFi lmao.
And most monitors have 5ms REAL latency, I’m living in a flat and people around me have tons of routers, WiFi devices and there’s simple fix for that - just choose another unoccupied channel?
Yup, GSM networks are about to be unplayable  I mean anything below HSPA+ at least. I’ve also played games on 3G (HSPA+) and 4G(LTE) and while 3G is having somewhat high ping LTE does it’s job just fine for most of the time unless ridiculous amounts of people start using it 
 
Recently I’ve seen some article comparing WiFi (AC 5GHz, N 2.4GHz), Powerline and Ethernet. Why you usually use WiFi or power line? Because of its convenience, I mean I will not make my flat looks bad with some weird wires unless I’m God in some games.. but to the topic - they actually found out that Powerline is worst in everything, only transfers are better also depends if that’s same socket or no - but even if it’s still worse than AC by A LOT. 
(That’s not the one but topic is similar https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/powerline-wireless-networking,2470-10.html)
So.. back in a day I would say if you really need stable “aka wired” connection go for Powerline, however now I would say go for AC/AX WiFi if you’re casual gamer and know how to configure your channels plus the distance isn’t far away or you use some antenna to strengthen it you’re really good to go.
 
And finally conclusion OP: If you can afford AC standard it will give you few milliseconds delay less, surely but only IF your network isn’t bottleneck so you really need to have a fibre. The difference is there and it’s pretty big I would say 802.11N 2.4GHz will have typically 3-5ms delay while 5GHz ac around 2ms. It is actually the best solution to have internet connection in unreachable by Ethernet cable places nowadays, I mean more affordable because obviously AX and it’s management is amazing but costs even more money 

Well thats what I was thinking, you got TLC plus ddr3 cache

AIDA64 reads for dual rank 3000CL16 read/write/copy/latency are better than single rank 3000CL14 in my scenario so it does make difference (see attachments - sorry for quality)
 
 

copy single.bmp

latency single.bmp

read single.bmp

write single.bmp