Nexxt

In layman's terms, GPU's can perform tasks like powers and vector calculations in a single cycle which allows it to run simulations significantly faster than CPU's, especially when things like protein folding involve lots of simulataneous math, which GPU's are good at because they have so many cores.

Both are single precision, the 958k is adjusted to CPU FLOPS to take into account that GPU's can perform tasks like powers in a single cycle where a CPU would take 2, the actual value compared to Linpack is somewhere between the two.

The F@H statistics page is up again, and currently the peak combined processing speed is 958 PFLOPS. This is nearly 5 times faster than the fastest supercomputer in the TOP500. (Summit: 201 PFLOPS) It's also faster than the combined peak processing power of the top 10. (742 PFLOPS) Doing pretty good if I can say say so. https://stats.foldingathome.org/os https://www.top500.org/lists/2019/11/

You're the only one taking about general health here, my replies in both cases have been about the OPs question of "Sperm Count", which I am failing to see anyone refute.

Agreed that mice having less mass is a factor, but saying "We're not freaking mice" isn't useful because you're not otherwise distinguishing how effects differ. The WiFi points used have an output of -28dBm and in the case of OP, he is concerned with it being positioned immediately next to (point blank) his crotch. Now I'll throw you a bone and state that human testing hasn't been published publicly so I cannot verify it scales as such, but initial findings suggest WiFi does kill off sperm count over time. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190429005914/en/Study-Showing-Mounting-Evidence-Harmful-Effects-WiFi

I laughed for a second, but then took the time to check. There are multiple studies showing 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi reduces sperm count, the people above have dismissed your question without bothering to check. There are articles dating back to 2011 on the matter. The above comments are likely in reference to the non-ionising nature of Wi-Fi (Which therefore cannot cause cancer). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503846/

Why? I don't recognise it as a high power chip, what is it?

Yeah, it's the connector marked "f_panel". If you don't have the manual and can't find it online, the best guess would be the standard layout: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000005643/boards-and-kits/desktop-boards.html

Try: FN+F10 Or: Realtek HD audio manager > Enable/Change Settings to output from jack.

Oh I agree the HD800s are flawed when it comes to pure entertainment factor, but they are the standard I hold any other "Audiophile" headphones to. My disappointment with the video was that Linus didn't try another pair of High-End headphones to get some perspective, using the HD800s as a warm-up might have allowed him to get some perspective on whether the Abyss were worth the cost.

Such snake oil in this video. $4,000 for an aluminium shelf? "Best headphone's I've ever listened to"? No sign of the HD800s to bring reality crashing in by referencing to a set of earphones made by a company that doesn't sell products with snake oil. I'd like to see a fixed set of good headphones -HD800s probably a good choice- for future "audiophile" headphones.

It has the specs of what DxDiag says, and it says its a prebuilt, it may be in a new case but that's it. ThinkCentre Edge 72 LENOVO 3484HPU mobo i3-3220 16 GB of RAM 1tb WD HDD >>> These are also the specs of your PC. https://www.lenovo.com/gb/en/desktops/thinkcentre/edge-series-towers/edge-72/ Sorry for your loss.

It's a prebuilt, that HDD is a decade old, the Mobo is 8 years old and belongs in a Lenovo prebuilt Thinkcentre Edge 72, processor is 7 years old, and the whole thing is worth ~$100 in its current condition (Minus your upgrades). You got ripped off for $600 CAN

It's a business tower from 2012, prebuilt, can't tell you if it was a "ripoff" without knowing how much it cost.

DAC time!