Đỗ Đức Huy

Continuing with the tease from Asrock a few days ago :https://www.anandtech.com/show/12544/asrock-teases-phantom-gaming-graphics-cards
I've collected this from a Facebook group where Asrock retail representative and fans meet up and discussed matters. One of the rep teased the following pictures, semi confirming the existence of Asrock's desktop graphic cards. We all have been bamboozled with the denial and misdirection of MXM cards for the small form factor market.
  

The cards are quoted to be released in Q2 2018, no word on pricing. 
EDIT! The cards are live! Best images of them can be found here:
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX580 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX570 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX560 2G/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX550 2G/index.asp

Continuing with the tease from Asrock a few days ago :https://www.anandtech.com/show/12544/asrock-teases-phantom-gaming-graphics-cards
I've collected this from a Facebook group where Asrock retail representative and fans meet up and discussed matters. One of the rep teased the following pictures, semi confirming the existence of Asrock's desktop graphic cards. We all have been bamboozled with the denial and misdirection of MXM cards for the small form factor market.
  

The cards are quoted to be released in Q2 2018, no word on pricing. 
EDIT! The cards are live! Best images of them can be found here:
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX580 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX570 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX560 2G/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX550 2G/index.asp

Looks Like an Asus Dual and EVGA /Zotac single fan designs
 

Here you go  https://www.anandtech.com/show/12544/asrock-teases-phantom-gaming-graphics-cards I do a good dead.
Your welcome to use my link @Đỗ Đức Huy.
 
 

Continuing with the tease from Asrock a few days ago :https://www.anandtech.com/show/12544/asrock-teases-phantom-gaming-graphics-cards
I've collected this from a Facebook group where Asrock retail representative and fans meet up and discussed matters. One of the rep teased the following pictures, semi confirming the existence of Asrock's desktop graphic cards. We all have been bamboozled with the denial and misdirection of MXM cards for the small form factor market.
  

The cards are quoted to be released in Q2 2018, no word on pricing. 
EDIT! The cards are live! Best images of them can be found here:
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX580 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX570 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX560 2G/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX550 2G/index.asp

Continuing with the tease from Asrock a few days ago :https://www.anandtech.com/show/12544/asrock-teases-phantom-gaming-graphics-cards
I've collected this from a Facebook group where Asrock retail representative and fans meet up and discussed matters. One of the rep teased the following pictures, semi confirming the existence of Asrock's desktop graphic cards. We all have been bamboozled with the denial and misdirection of MXM cards for the small form factor market.
  

The cards are quoted to be released in Q2 2018, no word on pricing. 
EDIT! The cards are live! Best images of them can be found here:
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX580 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming X Radeon RX570 8G OC/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX560 2G/index.asp
https://www.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Phantom Gaming Radeon RX550 2G/index.asp

Because everything is meaningless #edgy
 
No but I think what they meant is that they're not as reliable as a benchmark / have less credibility than something like say, Cinebench or Futuremark.

Yes that's exactly how it works; it makes it think less time has passed.  It actually makes cinebench scores higher, and makes it report high clock speeds due to apparently elevated base clock, but none of it is real.
 
Here's a great video:
 

Geekbench is meaningless, don't get overly excited over this. Wait until we get some real benchmark results.

I'm not surprised they're making record profits. The shortage doesn't mean  they're unable to make huge profits, it means they can't make enough product to meet demand. 

You can tell your seller to take that thing and shove it far up his ass.
 
That thing is ancient. Here is a review on it.
https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/6815/sandisk-ulltradimm-ddr3-400gb-ssd-enterprise-review/index.html
 

It's not new. They're known as Solid State Modules.
 
Mechanically compatible with DDR3.
 
Your "local SSD seller" is talking balls tbh. Don't think they'll get any more.

Their workstation class drivers are certified. Geforce ones aren't. I don't get all these stupid bashing on Nvidia.
 
 

It's not like this line in the ToC says Nvidia will send in a SWAT team if they see you using a Geforce card in your datacenter, it's just because they must be tired of getting support calls from uneducated owners who thought they were saving a buck. This way they can deny these people the support they don't deserve. The price premium on Quadro cards is justified as I stated before. These cards are validated for data center use, the drivers are validated for data center use, and you get support for data center applications, none of those things are free, so they front load the cost onto the card. This is something that is repeated in almost every market. I work for a distributor, our prices in a lot of cases don't beat our competitors, but our customers are more than willing to pay more for their parts because they know we have knowledgle and experienced tech support staff who will provide them support for "free"

Part of it might also be that they are getting an unusual amount of RMA requests for devices being used in datacenters because the cards are installed in a matter which causes them to basically suffocate. The datacenter style graphics cards are designed with the high flow and pressure front to back airflow built into servers. This is just playing the benefit of the doubt that they're more interested in both selling the right product for the value of it and so that there aren't as many devices possibly being taken out of use due to improper deployment. 

I think they just don't want people using consumer grade hardware in industrial scenarios like a data center. Their issue is if they don't explicitly forbid people from using consumer grade cards in their data centers, they will end up getting all kinds of support calls and issues where the customer believes this is actually Nvidia's fault where it's really their own fault for using the wrong hardware. 
 
To give a bit of an example, you wouldn't slap a netgear switch in a panel in a boiler room at school. Consumer grade routers aren't rated to operate in ambient temperatures that you might see in a metal box in a boiler room, but you can bet that the System Intergrator that installed that switch is going to have an unhappy customer when they come in in the morning to a cold building because their controllers aren't talking anymore.
 
Nvidia doesn't validate their consumer grade cards to run flat out 24/7, and their drivers aren't validated to have high accuracy when doing computations. The cost premium on Quadro cards come from the extra validation Nvidia does on the cards and the drivers.

No it doesn't. Until someone can show an 8700K working on an uber cheap board (which was Intel's primary stated reason for modifying LGA 1151), this doesn't prove anything.

We are not dismissive of Geekbench because it is synthetic, we are dismissive of it because it's an incredibly poor, inaccurate benchmark. You can have identical CPU's at identical clocks, but different memory speeds will drastically alter the results of the score. Why is that a problem? Geekbench only reports default DMI strings, so you never really know the actual clock speeds of the hardware that is listed. Not only that, but clean OS install's score much higher than bloated OS's. So while you can see the CPU is identical, and the clock speed on the DMI string might be identical, knowing the exact clock speed/state of the OS is next to impossible
 
You simply cannot compare two opposing scores on Geekbench unless you have an absolute control over both devices being tested.

DUH, if you emulate it it performs poorly... nobody with any understanding of how emulation works would have expected anything different. "Just fine" for microsoft word doesn't mean it will be fast.
Emulated x86 geekbench I might add.

Real benchmarks only pls.
 
Geekbench sucks.

I thought we all agreed Geekbench is a terrible way to compare CPUs because it's just flatout inaccurate.

well they killed the Atom already, and these chips were basically just a shitload of Atoms with glue so in a way im not surprised

Dual socket, not too sure about OC support since this is more of a server/workstation board

Asus Z8D6 mobo are the best dual LGA 1336 mobo to build in. ATX foot print, single 8 pin EPS connector right next to the 24 pin ATX connector and SAS support. Me like

Asus Z8D6 mobo are the best dual LGA 1336 mobo to build in. ATX foot print, single 8 pin EPS connector right next to the 24 pin ATX connector and SAS support. Me like