Thank you. People love to hate on Epic but for what its worth, they at least make fun games (or A fun game, rather) that actually focuses on not just hardcore player base, but a casual player base as well. When it comes to (a game, not the company itself) I've always felt like Fortnite took the family friendly approach (similar to Nintendo) and cranked it to 11 by allowing cross-platform support 100%. Fighting Sony tooth and nail until they allowed for true cross platform support.
People aren't wrong when they say Epic can just choose not to support iOS, but the range that Fortnite has as a game makes me feel like that really isn't the case. Their customers more or less demand cross-platform compatibilty at this point, so their argument makes sense to me. If you were an app developer that wanted to be in the Apple ecosystem, and you wanted your application to be a part of the platform, than the 30% cut makes sense. What Epic wants is to have their game accessable to the most amount of people, regardless of the platform. To that end, they are forced to be a part of Apple's ecosystem. Okay, fine. Feel free to charge server space, bandwidth, whatever. But taking a cut of their profits does seem off to me.
