Call_Me_Daddy

I've already seen that video, the case already has a slot to vertical mount a GPU so I'm just looking for specific information on the actual case.

I'm a telecommunications network engineer, working at one of Europe's main carrier since 2013. My apologies for my unperfect english.
 
My problem with this kind of theories is that they usually use people fear of things that don't really exist yet to get attention to their cause. And this has been true for ALL wireless technologies.
It has been true for mobile communication since first generations (2G,3G,4G included).
 
The problem is more data transfered doesn't mean more power required.
 
In Europe, one of the first mobile networks was called bi-bop. There were signs in the streets saying 'bi-bop' area. You had to stand very close to the antenna in order to get signal, power used was high and was transmitting only voice.
 
With each new technology, we've been able to transmit more data with less power and this comes from a simple fact.
In order to increase data rates, you either can :
Increase signal frequency, which means more symbols every second Increase "sensitivity" in order to have more possible value for each symbol transmitted. Every new mobile network gen did both, and 5G makes no exception. What it's basically doing is with same or lower power, it transmits more data and in a way that is software managed better.
 
SO, what could be the problem with 5G ?
 
Frequencies ? Those have been used for years  either for mobile or other use. As you may know, even some weather sensor networks use those frequencies and i've never heared of headaches near weather stations.
 
Power ? It's going to be dynamically set, directionnaly (and it doesn't mean concentrated it just means geographically oriented to the user who needs it instead of sent everywhere) and it's more likely to be lower than previous gens.
 
PLUS, 5G is meant to be used in cities, which are already full or radio waves.
 
I'm not saying that it's going to be healthly. And believe me I don't want my health condition to be less good for the sake of radio networks. I'm saying that NOONE has ever really been able to show that it would be bad, and if we did, we would also probably be able to demonstrate that it's going better with every new gen.

I'm a telecommunications network engineer, working at one of Europe's main carrier since 2013. My apologies for my unperfect english.
 
My problem with this kind of theories is that they usually use people fear of things that don't really exist yet to get attention to their cause. And this has been true for ALL wireless technologies.
It has been true for mobile communication since first generations (2G,3G,4G included).
 
The problem is more data transfered doesn't mean more power required.
 
In Europe, one of the first mobile networks was called bi-bop. There were signs in the streets saying 'bi-bop' area. You had to stand very close to the antenna in order to get signal, power used was high and was transmitting only voice.
 
With each new technology, we've been able to transmit more data with less power and this comes from a simple fact.
In order to increase data rates, you either can :
Increase signal frequency, which means more symbols every second Increase "sensitivity" in order to have more possible value for each symbol transmitted. Every new mobile network gen did both, and 5G makes no exception. What it's basically doing is with same or lower power, it transmits more data and in a way that is software managed better.
 
SO, what could be the problem with 5G ?
 
Frequencies ? Those have been used for years  either for mobile or other use. As you may know, even some weather sensor networks use those frequencies and i've never heared of headaches near weather stations.
 
Power ? It's going to be dynamically set, directionnaly (and it doesn't mean concentrated it just means geographically oriented to the user who needs it instead of sent everywhere) and it's more likely to be lower than previous gens.
 
PLUS, 5G is meant to be used in cities, which are already full or radio waves.
 
I'm not saying that it's going to be healthly. And believe me I don't want my health condition to be less good for the sake of radio networks. I'm saying that NOONE has ever really been able to show that it would be bad, and if we did, we would also probably be able to demonstrate that it's going better with every new gen.

I'm a telecommunications network engineer, working at one of Europe's main carrier since 2013. My apologies for my unperfect english.
 
My problem with this kind of theories is that they usually use people fear of things that don't really exist yet to get attention to their cause. And this has been true for ALL wireless technologies.
It has been true for mobile communication since first generations (2G,3G,4G included).
 
The problem is more data transfered doesn't mean more power required.
 
In Europe, one of the first mobile networks was called bi-bop. There were signs in the streets saying 'bi-bop' area. You had to stand very close to the antenna in order to get signal, power used was high and was transmitting only voice.
 
With each new technology, we've been able to transmit more data with less power and this comes from a simple fact.
In order to increase data rates, you either can :
Increase signal frequency, which means more symbols every second Increase "sensitivity" in order to have more possible value for each symbol transmitted. Every new mobile network gen did both, and 5G makes no exception. What it's basically doing is with same or lower power, it transmits more data and in a way that is software managed better.
 
SO, what could be the problem with 5G ?
 
Frequencies ? Those have been used for years  either for mobile or other use. As you may know, even some weather sensor networks use those frequencies and i've never heared of headaches near weather stations.
 
Power ? It's going to be dynamically set, directionnaly (and it doesn't mean concentrated it just means geographically oriented to the user who needs it instead of sent everywhere) and it's more likely to be lower than previous gens.
 
PLUS, 5G is meant to be used in cities, which are already full or radio waves.
 
I'm not saying that it's going to be healthly. And believe me I don't want my health condition to be less good for the sake of radio networks. I'm saying that NOONE has ever really been able to show that it would be bad, and if we did, we would also probably be able to demonstrate that it's going better with every new gen.

I'm a telecommunications network engineer, working at one of Europe's main carrier since 2013. My apologies for my unperfect english.
 
My problem with this kind of theories is that they usually use people fear of things that don't really exist yet to get attention to their cause. And this has been true for ALL wireless technologies.
It has been true for mobile communication since first generations (2G,3G,4G included).
 
The problem is more data transfered doesn't mean more power required.
 
In Europe, one of the first mobile networks was called bi-bop. There were signs in the streets saying 'bi-bop' area. You had to stand very close to the antenna in order to get signal, power used was high and was transmitting only voice.
 
With each new technology, we've been able to transmit more data with less power and this comes from a simple fact.
In order to increase data rates, you either can :
Increase signal frequency, which means more symbols every second Increase "sensitivity" in order to have more possible value for each symbol transmitted. Every new mobile network gen did both, and 5G makes no exception. What it's basically doing is with same or lower power, it transmits more data and in a way that is software managed better.
 
SO, what could be the problem with 5G ?
 
Frequencies ? Those have been used for years  either for mobile or other use. As you may know, even some weather sensor networks use those frequencies and i've never heared of headaches near weather stations.
 
Power ? It's going to be dynamically set, directionnaly (and it doesn't mean concentrated it just means geographically oriented to the user who needs it instead of sent everywhere) and it's more likely to be lower than previous gens.
 
PLUS, 5G is meant to be used in cities, which are already full or radio waves.
 
I'm not saying that it's going to be healthly. And believe me I don't want my health condition to be less good for the sake of radio networks. I'm saying that NOONE has ever really been able to show that it would be bad, and if we did, we would also probably be able to demonstrate that it's going better with every new gen.

This was my first cosplay related project ever and I loved making it !
The weapon in obviously fake and was 3D printed, painted and wired so that it emits lights and sounds from external speakers (using a bluetooth module).
 
I loved making it so much that I posted a video and there is the trailer !
You can see the whole video from my youtube Channel which is named 20Cent Hardware.
 
I hope that you'll like it as much as I did making it !
<content removed>
 
Turn the sound on while watching !
 
 
 

Thanks very much I appreciate !
No worries about skipping, the few people who say they don't are liars

Do you research before buying 360 rad for the side. it might be very tricky to have it installed and not many rads fit without any problems there. Hint: you 360 ad MUST be no more than 122mm in width, otherwise some custom mods with the case must be done in order to install the rad. A water temp sensor is a good idea also, this way you can control the fan speed by water temp.

Thanks
 

I always try to match fittings and tubing from the same company. Personally i avoid TT due to personal bias.
 
Having said that your tubes remind me of the distortions in the hardlined node 202 case that was also overheating.
 
Soft tubing may help, but personally i'd try mounting the radiator on top exhaust (or front exhaust) so you dont reheat case internals. A more aggresive fan curve may also help
 
Generally a well set up GPU = fluid temperatures in my experience and so your fluid is probably 50 degrees during light gaming which is quite hot. You are approaching temperatures that are not healthy for your pump so regardless of whether you change the tubing, your fluid temperature needs to be addressed.

Thanks for the advice!
 
Yeah, I just found a listing for a fully new iPhone 8 Plus 64GB in silver for £599 with 1yr Apple warranty so I'm highly tempted.
 
As for my iPhone 6s, I would need to consult with my dad as he is certain he wants to use eBay as what he used to sell was always within our area, so it shouldn't be a problem there.
I'm just concerned that I've recently replaced my 6s' battery so I wouldn't want me or my dad to be responsible if my 6s were to shit the fan with the buyer...

Hi !
 
That's definitely something that I can advise to you (solution 2). However, I would recommend selling on a "local" second hand website. Meeting your buyers (no alone) is way safer IMO plus you won't have to pay ebay. We do have one in france and it's very helpful. I'm selling my iPhone year after year in order to keep up to date (I sell them at a lower price but I get them cheaper as long as I work at a network carrier).
 
However, iPhone 6s prices start going lower and I'd not be expecting one to be sold much above 200-250€ depending on its condition.
 
I hope this helps !

I have done that with a cpu air cooler before lol

The shape doesn't matter. All that's matter is the voltage which should be the same.

The reason for this different shape on the 8pin connector is that you can use either half of that in a 4 pin counterpart.
Though you don't need to look at wich side of the Connector to put in, you can use either...

I think your issue is not related to that connector. That connector should work just fine to my knowledge.

Nice work!  Love the curves!

Ok so after many new adventures, here is how my loop looks like ! 
Im really glad of the results and I’d really like to thank you all for helping out in this challenge which I loved !!!

In no way shape or form could I ever be considered a pro builder.  ?
I do have a few friends who do custom builds for extra money tho and I consider them pros.
 
It's super funny the things one can forget just because you're so familiar with a workflow you're acting on autopilot.
Well, sometimes only funny after some time and reflection but you get my point.  LOL
 
We absolutely do all make mistakes!  Hopefully they don't end up being too expensive more often than not.  I'm sorry to hear about your CPU....  that's a lot of money.

Hahaha...... in a rush were we? No worries I broke a 1500 dollar CPU from rushing a delid....we all make mistakes.

Yea, like is said. The contact bewteen the cpu and block. 

Ok so this is how the first tube try looks like ! It seems to be perfectly sealed. When i pull nothing comes off.
 
Any thoughts ?
 
I'm probably going to do the same thing with the other tube because I enjoy how it looks like
 

Makes sense on the face of it, but look at it this way.  Sometimes upgrades are spur of the moment. You get a bonus at work or a gift of some money and find some higher speed RAM on sale...  Or a new SSD/HDD you could add to your system and heck you could use the space....  Why not?
 
Unless a component is water cooled, you really do not want to have to remove your pipes and drain your loop just to quickly upgrade it.  It's a best practice. 
 
Ideally, once this loop is in place you want to keep it there for as long as possible until you have to take out and then re-seat tubes or replace a tube/bend for some reason.  Maintenance should really only require a flush - possibly with blitz if needed - and then changing out your fluid.  You should have full maintenance access to your board and any components and headers on it without messing with your loop.  Unseating and re-seating tubes can put wear and tear on the o-rings and seals as well.
 
I can't stress enough to not fill and leak test with your Motherboard plugged into the PSU.  Clearance to unplug and plug that alone should be reason to give yourself enough space there, even if you think you'll keep that RAM forever and the likelihood of any stick failing is almost zero.
 
I hear you on the bends the Thermaltake kit gives.  I wasn't much of a fan either, and yes I felt the same about the 90 degree not actually ending up a true 90 degree.  Not sure what that is.  I did find the cutter far superior to what I bought at the local hardware store though, and I also found the chamfer tool very helpful.
 
Really looking forward to seeing what you do.  It's so much work and planning but so rewarding.

Hi !
RGB is a huge mess.
 
Recent motherboards have RGB Headers and / or Digital RGB headers. They both allow rgb software control but Digital wil enable adress each led individually while classic RGB header will color all the chain in the same way.
 
Each manufacturer provides a software (aura sync, RGB fusion...)
 
When you purchase any RGB component, be sure that it is being sold as compatible with your MB software (althought I already had Aura sync components working on a RGB Fusion MB without any problem).
 
It's the same for hubs. Be sure that they have rgb header connectors. Some of them have only external remote control, other like Corsair RGB Hub will only connect to your USB header, and work only with their own software, meaning that you'll be able to control rgb but you won't be able to sync them with your rgb header components.
I made this mistake. However, I modded my Corsair hub to make it work using a rgb header, which definitely saved me.
 
 
Regarding chaining : you can chain multiple components to the same hub (all same brand, plus depends on the hub capacity) or to the same RGB / DRGB header, as long as you don't go over the max amperage of the header (depends on the MB and on the components).
Also, most rgb peripherals use 5V, but other use 12V. Headers usually have a 5 or 12 V jumper so you won't be able to combine 5 & 12V components on the same header.
 
RGB multiplexers are cheap (at Aliexpress F.E., a bit more expensive if you go with brands such as cooler master) and easy to get.
 
Regarding my own case. My MB has 2 12V RGB headers and 2 jumber 5/12V DRGB headers. I connected :
 
RGB Header 1 : 1 Jobsno led strip and 4 ram RGB heat spreaders from the same brand. They come with chaining adapters.
RGB header 2 : Nothing at the moment, but I'm planning to connect my Phanteks CPU block + EK GPU waterblock once I built my Loop
DRGB header 1 : As mentionned earlier, I have 5 HD120 case fans connected to a corsair hub (provided with hd120 fans pack). This hub is meant to be controlled either with the embedded remote, or using a usb header adapter. What I did is I cut the remote cable and modded it with a spare rgb header cable. Fans are now controlled with RGBfusion. Luck ? Mabe. But technically RGB cables are just power + power control connected to regular LEDs. Manufacturers just try to make you buy more from them and use their own software.
DRGB header 2 : Nothing at the moment. I'll connect my RGB backplate when I recieve it.

My case is a Phanteks p350X which comes with a rgb header cable but I currently don't need it as the default rainbow animation suits me very well.
 
So basically I was able to connect 5 HD120 Fans to the same drgb header without going over amperage limitation.
 
 
I hope this helps !
Vincent

Corsair hub is a good choice in your scenario because they will be controlled via USB and don't require a rgb header.
Corsair sells rgb strips that can be connected to its hub.
 
There's a whole thread about it at corsairs forums : http://forum.corsair.com/v3/showthread.php?t=173880
 
Corsair hubs are just chaining LEDs so modding cables could be a solution but I wouldn't risk it.