Hello there,
Im looking for your guys' opinions on the topic, for any of you willing to share them.
I've decided to build a mini-pc form factor home server, running linux - xubuntu 20.04 or a minimal centos 8.1.1911, which ill be using
for a few purposes:
- main - OpenVPN srv
- home NAS proxy
- home gallery web-app with a small db
- smtp srv
The goal here is to remove some of the load, even it being minimal, from my main home server, which i now need for other purposes.
Given that basic description, i can't really decide a few things, given the form factor and budget restrictions:
1) what ssd to use? - most mini-pc boxes come bare-bones, w/ no ram or disk installed and its cheaper to buy and install those myself.
Given that, the disk problem is what to use in the 2.5` form factor for a low load r/w system like that, but also for 24/7 availability.
Just to be specific - that will be the boot drive and there will be no form of raid going on there, so stuff like wd reds are out of this scope.
After doing some research, i stopped on the Seagate Barracuda Compute /green/ 2.5` SSDs as an option - any alternatives you would recommend, or just
feedback based on your experience in a similar situation?
2) my purposes do not need a high end machine to run, especially given the fact that there is no way there will ever be more than 3-4 users active on it,
with a max capacity of 20 intended.
Because of this, ive stopped at choosing between the following 2 configurations /generalized/:
- Intel Celeron J4105 w/ max capacity 8gb ddr4 sodimm(1 slot) ram @2400mhz - comment: personally i like this better, even though it has less memory.
- Intel Celeron J3160 w/ max capacity 16gb ddr3 sodimm(2 slots) ram @1600mhz - comment: this is incrementally slower than the one above, but
there is obviously more memory capacity for the services ill be running, meaning more sessions and some os overhead ++ dimms are cheaper.
Any thoughts and suggestions on why and if the older architecture would ever be better in a scenario like this?
3) im having some concerns in regards to intel's turbo boost under linux, since both cpu options support it.
I have honestly never had to even think about that, since previously i have been always using much more powerful hardware.
I've researched quite a bit, but just in case you guys have any experience with it and you are willing to share, id be happy to get your personal
feedback on the matter.
Cheers