Jump to content

hollyh88

Member
  • Posts

    906
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hollyh88

  1. buuut with what cooler
  2. well he was baffled at the 212 black being able to handle 1.45 and even 1.5 lol. same as me. it runs at 4.1 with 1.4v so thats perfectly fine for now. sure ill try dram but maybe when i have researched more about it
  3. hey im just spitting ideas. i suppose some heatsinks even of the same brand can be manufactured just a tinnnnnyyyy bit different. some grams too much of a specific metal and you could get a better or worse version of the same heatsink. i mean i for one am curious if you can pull it off too. don't know how mine did it though. all i know is that my previous hyper 212 evo for the i5 7600 i had before this ryzen cpu did me well so i stayed with it. (mainly because noctua only had barf coloured coolers back then). i think its an amazing product for what you spend your bucks on. its known to be the budget performer. got it for 32 euros even. so pretty cheap. and yeah the thermal paste i have isn't the top of the line either. but i guess it performs damm well. all i know is that its thermal paste thats also used by more than just computer enthousiasts. but it wouldnt be a fair comparison if you bought the 212 black but dont have the 2600x curious what you find though so keep me updated.
  4. Gaming runs fine too on that oc well i do know that some mobos handle heat better. and even some coolers perform better than others of the same brand and well making. also.. if you wanne know the thermal paste i have on it it's this one: https://www.coolblue.nl/product/767423/titan-ttg-g30030-koelpasta.html.
  5. well i know that there were improvements between the 1000 series and 2000 series. especially on what it can take. I cant say i know why something indeed like a hyper 212 black edition can take it. dont get me wrong my old case heated it up, this case has 3 front fans 1 back fan pulling air out. there is a mesh ontop and at the psu below. there is nothing blocking the fan of the cpu. I really dont wanne reset the bios via cmos. the cmos is kinda eh shitty to get to on this mobo. i would have to bring my case downstairs take out gpu take out cables and cpu cooler and then i can do it safely. a big hassle. i did however simply reset the bios within the bios. it has made hwm a bit more accurate, maybe i just have an outdated version and i never noticed. idk. i really think the 1.5v was just a spike. although it did report it on all the cores with pbo. maybe i actually have won the lottery and my cpu can handle way more than others would? the 212 black edition does keep it around 73 on all cores. wich is still hot im sure an all water loop with pump would take it down further. but im impressed. i do have to note that i was thinking about getting the noctua cooler now that its finally not in hidious brown. but i will do that when i upgrade my cpu. as clearly i dont need it at all now.
  6. i honestly dont know what to tell you i dont oc to get points on it. i guess if you mix an air cooler with a case that has airflow it will perform alright. sure i can get a nice water aio cooler that may downgrade temps a bit but as linus already pointed out.. air coolers can even beat an aio or do equally as good. so it just really depends on what you put under it. ill just stick with this 4.1 since its at the 1.4v "safe" zone and doesnt crash r20. which is why ill stick to my current oc. so it can even handle those workloads. maybe ill try vinding the perfect voltage for 4.2 another time. maybe some people that have the same cpu could bring their achievements to this post.
  7. probably has to do with outdated r15. it says windows 8 while im on windows 10 lol.
  8. maybe my pc is just a bit eh weird? or i have a lose gun cpu that changes how it likes its actually a highly advanced AI lmao. would love to see the 4.2 work on cinebench r20 but it just keeeps crashing. while gaming and cinebench r 15 goes without issues.
  9. im back with new screenshots i set back the oc to a 4.1 on all core on 1.4v this is what i got: in cb15 it hovered between 67/70. in cb20 it hovered between 73/75. 76 was a 1 sec thing as it speeded up. oh and yeah dont look the dram stuff like i said i used xmp profile 2 and this is stable without issues. so thats something i dont want to mess with for now.
  10. well that report might have been a spike. all in all i dont know. i can say that the case i have has brought down my temps significantly. used to have a single front fan intake sharkoon case. a t3 orso. compared to the Cooler Master MasterBox MB511 RGB i have now with huuuge airflow intake.
  11. cinebench r20 does more instructions so it is tougher on overclocks and can actually notice more overclocking failures due to that. thats why r15 can do an overclock flawlessly but as soon as you go and do it on r20 it crashes.
  12. i dont know man. all i do know is that yours has 1 more option. where is single core run with mine? maybe the cinebench i have is wrong? like i said i dont know. your the cinebench master here the speeds that hwm provides are however correct. they show ingame too. and with ryzen master.
  13. i could do that yes. go back to how it was before the 3000 series came out. but... the bios hasnt been giving me any issues so far. not even the new one. i actually recommended this mobo to a friend. he upgraded to this mobo with a 3600 and 2070 super. he hasnt been having issues either.
  14. im just showing you what i got lol XD i am not manipulating anything.
  15. good news i managed to get it to work with simple out of box no pbo at all settings here is the result.
  16. cpu clock speed. and voltage yes. not offset just per amount it allows.
  17. i have all the latest drivers at least im sure did a check in the weekend even. ryzen master does indeed report correct. but hardware monitor 99% of the time works fine. the other 1% it reports something wacky
  18. i have the newest so maybe?
  19. i know which is another weird thing. if i use pbo via mobo it can go up very high. if i use pbo via ryzen master it stays at save volts.
  20. im not a cinebench master as yourself. i just boot it up and use it if i want to test an oc. or temps i do know that r20 is more unforgiving oc wise. and puts more stress on the cpu. so ultimately it would fail more or get hotter on there. dont seem to be an issue currently well.. only with pbo that is.
  21. i would but even running stock settings out of the box cpu performance seems to crash r20. the only thing that so far worked is having pbo enabled and just that cpu wise. maybe a bug? maybe not. i dont know. pic below is with pbo
  22. yeah i took it off the 1.45v its at 1.42v 3 fps in some games. more in others. more performance is more performance. typhoon burner gives a massive red flag on my virus scanner. also, the difference between the 2600x and the 3700x is not little though. i mean about 20+ more fps. thats not little my mobo is in my signature. Its the msi b450 gaming pro carbon ac. which as far as i know has excellent vrm
  23. if you read what i wrote in other comments. i only use cinebench to test heat and stability. not to get the most points.
  24. 4194? aka 4.2 it says it right there. 5200 is nothing. it even said 10000 at one point lmao. thats just the software fucking up the highest speeds noted. but i mean if you dont want to believe me still go ahead.
  25. there you go. proof see highest temps, thats how hot it got during cinebench.
×